Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Free Webinar - The Role of Psychology in Trading - Thursday, December 8, 2022 | 04:00PM EST Enroll Now

Stanford Proposes Reversible ETH Token Standard To Combat Crime

Cryptocurrency Sep 28, 2022 05:00AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
Stanford Proposes Reversible ETH Token Standard To Combat Crime
 
ETH/USD
+3.77%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

  • Stanford suggests new Ethereum Standards that allow reversible transactions.
  • The ERC-20R and ERC-721R are expected to combat illegal activities.
  • The proposed standards won’t make the entire ETH network reversible.

Researchers at Stanford University have designed a prototype for “reversible transactions” on Ethereum, which they argue could mitigate the effects of crypto theft.

The new Ethereum token standards, termed ERC-20R and ERC-721R were proposed by Stanford scientists Kaili Wang, Qinchen Wang, and Dan Boneh. These prototype opt-in token standards allow for the reversal of transactions when the circumstances require it.

In the event of a hack or theft, the paper calls for a blockchain “back button” or “undo button.” It argues that reversible transactions are necessary in light of recent events like the BAYC phishing attempts, Poly Network attack, Harmony Bridge hack, and Ronin theft.

One of the researchers, Kaili Wang, commented on the matter, stating:

The major hacks we’ve seen are undeniably thefts with strong evidence. If there was a way to reverse those thefts under such circumstances, our ecosystem would be much safer. Our proposal allows reversals only if approved by a decentralized quorum of judges.

Wang emphasized, however, that the prototype was not intended to replace ERC-20 tokens or render Ethereum reversible. Rather, it is an opt-in standard that “allows a short time window post-transaction for thefts to be contested and possibly restored.”

If someone’s tokens are stolen, they can file a request with a governance contract to have their assets frozen. As a result, a decentralized court of judges will need to vote “within a day or two at most” on whether or not to grant the request.

In the event that an attacker is aware of the impending freeze on the transactions, the researchers suggested performing the full freeze on-chain in a single transaction “so that the attacker can’t outrun the freeze.”

The researchers did admit that selecting the judges who would be in charge of ruling on the planned ERC-20R and ERC-721R tokens was the most ambiguous component of the system.

The post Stanford Proposes Reversible ETH Token Standard To Combat Crime appeared first on Coin Edition.

See original on CoinEdition

Stanford Proposes Reversible ETH Token Standard To Combat Crime
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Hulon Dalo
Hulon Dalo Sep 28, 2022 6:22AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
what's then the point of blockchain's immutability? imho consumer protection should fall on exchanges, not platforms. (ps: I admire Dan Boneh, I learn a lot about cryptography from his free course Intro to Cryptography)
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email