Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Free Webinar - The Role of Psychology in Trading - Thursday, December 8, 2022 | 04:00PM EST Enroll Now

SEC Claims Jurisdiction Over Ethereum is Under U.S. Regime Purview

Cryptocurrency Sep 20, 2022 07:00AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters SEC Claims Jurisdiction Over Ethereum is Under U.S. Regime Purview
 
TWTR
+0.00%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
ETH/USD
+0.31%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

  • The SEC claims that jurisdiction over ETH falls under the purview of the U.S. government.
  • SEC states why the jurisdiction over ETH should remain under the purview of the U.S. government.
  • Brian Fyre doubts the court will stand by the SEC’s claim, but skepticism is as large as life.

The U.S. Security Exchange Commission (SEC) claims that jurisdiction over Ethereum remains under the U.S. government’s purview following the lawsuit filed against crypto influencer and CEO of Token Metrics, Ian Balina. The subject was sued on Monday for failing to register his cryptocurrency as a security before the Initial Coin Offering (ICO) in 2018.

Although the case appeared run-of-the-mill at first, since the SEC had been filing lawsuits against individuals and companies for unregistered ICO issues, this case took a different path.

The SEC’s bold and unprecedented claim in the 69th paragraph of the lawsuit was a pivotal highlight that drew the attention of many.

In the 69th paragraph of the lawsuit, the SEC states :

The U.S. based investors in Balina’s pool irrevocably committed to the transaction when from within the United States, at that point, their ETH contributions were validated by a network of nodes on the Ethereum blockchain, which are clustered more densely in the United States than in any other country. As a result, those transactions took place in the United States.

The SEC argued in the complaint that it had the right to sue Balina not only because the transactions happened in the U.S. but also because the majority of all ETH nodes (45-85%) that validate transactions are in the U.S., which intuitively falls under the purview of the U.S. government.

This notion raised alarms in the crypto community and some responded on Twitter (NYSE:TWTR):

Brian Fyre, a law professor at the University of Kentucky, stated that although the language of the complaint doesn’t have the legal weightage for the court to stand by it, he is skeptical about it.

While Fyre thinks so, SEC Chair Gary Gensler thinks that Ethereum’s transition to proof-of-stake would bring Ethereum closer to the definition of security through the government’s lens. Subsequently, Ian Balina submitted a response to point out the SEC’s baseless charges in this case.

The post SEC Claims Jurisdiction Over Ethereum is Under U.S. Regime Purview appeared first on Coin Edition.

See original on CoinEdition

SEC Claims Jurisdiction Over Ethereum is Under U.S. Regime Purview
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email