
Please try another search
CEO of FTX exchange Sand Bankman-Fried (SBF), took to Twitter to thank the netizens who pointed out the loopholes and criticized his proposed regulatory framework. SBF regarded the feedback as constructive criticism and thanked everyone for their valuable insights.
3) First off—a huge thanks to everyone who gave constructive feedback, comments, and criticism—notably @ErikVoorhees and @RyanSAdams but too many more to name. I’ve revised my post some already, and will continue to do so.— SBF (@SBF_FTX) October 23, 2022
SBF specifically mentioned Erik Voorhees, the founder of ShapeShift open-source crypto platform, and crypto investor Ryan Sean Adams for their valuable insights and thanked them.
Voorhees replied to SBF’s Twitter post saying that he could either advocate for “Effective Altruism” or advocate banning 80 million innocent Iranians from the future of global finance, not both. In addition, Vorhees stated:
Glorifying OFAC [Office of Foreign Assets Control] in proposed crypto-industry standards is a *non-starter*
Moreover, Voorhees wrote a blog post named “Response to SBF and Principled Crypto Regulation.” which elaborates on the drawbacks of SBF’s proposal.
Meanwhile, Adams, the other netizen addressed by SBF, argued on Twitter that some of the regulations proposed would eliminate the U.S from the crypto race.
Notably, following a barrage of criticism, SBF took to Twitter to show his respect for the opinions shared by the crypto netizens.
Moreover, he stated:
While I don’t myself wear glasses, I’m excited to join our bespectacled brethren
However, SBF didn’t just stop by respecting different views of the people but went on to make alterations and explicitly explain the thought process behind using terms as expressed in his proposal. Subsequently, he shared the alteration and explanation in a series of threads on Twitter:
1) Whelp, that was an interesting few days.A retrospective.— SBF (@SBF_FTX) October 23, 2022
Importantly, SBF insists again that this is “NOT LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR FINANCIAL ADVICE” just like he did during the first time he proposed the layout.
The post SBF Revises Proposed Regulation After Barrage of Criticism appeared first on Coin Edition.
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.