Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Meta Reportedly Shopping Its Share of Battered Stablecoin Diem

CryptocurrencyJan 27, 2022 03:30AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
Meta Reportedly Shopping Its Share of Battered Stablecoin Diem

It’s been a brutal three years for the Diem Association – the consortium funded by Meta/Facebook and others – that sought to originally launch a cryptocurrency called Libra in 2019. The Association tabled that idea and reconfigured the project to be a dollar-backed stablecoin called Diem. That pivot was necessary after Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) CEO Mark Zuckerberg was called before Congress and defended the original Libra project. However, Zuckerberg’s testimony didn’t help his situation and regulatory pressure mounted.

Since then the project has had its ups and downs – more downs than ups if we’re being honest – including the departure last year of its high-profile co-founder David Marcus. As a result of all those challenges, Bloomberg reported Wednesday that Meta/Facebook is looking to finally sell its stake in the Diem Association. It doesn’t take a genius to realize that without the backing of Meta, Diem is all but dead.

In actuality, it’s been dead for months despite marketing and publicity pablum to the contrary, existing only as a zombie project that would never get past regulatory ridicule. Last fall, when then-Facebook selected Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) as its custodial partner for Zuckerberg’s Novi digital wallet, that partnership was roundly rebuffed by politicos. The backlash from lawmakers was swift and direct, as noted in a joint letter to Zuckerberg from six senators who called on Facebook to abandon Novi and pledge not to bring the Diem stablecoin to market.

“Facebook is once again pursuing digital currency plans on an aggressive timeline and has already launched a pilot for a payments infrastructure network, even though these plans are incompatible with the actual financial regulatory landscape—not only for Diem specifically, but also for stablecoins in general,” the senators wrote in their letter to Zuckerberg. “Unfortunately, Facebook’s decision to pursue a digital currency and payments network is just one more example of the company ‘moving fast and breaking things’ (and in too many cases, misleading Congress in order to do so). Facebook cannot be trusted to manage a payment system or digital currency when its existing ability to manage risks and keep consumers safe has proven wholly insufficient.” Despite this seeming death knell from key policy makers, the Bloomberg article states that the Diem association struck an arrangement with Silvergate Capital (NYSE:SI) Corp. bank to issue Diem, but resistance from the U.S. Federal Reserve dealt that effort a truly fatal blow.

The article went on to state that after a lengthy back-and-forth between the Diem advocates and regulators, Fed officials finally told Silvergate that the agency was uneasy with the plan and couldn’t assure the bank that it would allow the stablecoin to be issued. So without approval, the Diem project had no coin – leading up to Meta’s reported decision to sell its stake in Diem. Valuations of the Diem assets are unclear and people close to the situation told Bloomberg that there was no guarantee Diem will find a buyer. We’ll have to wait and see how this ongoing saga unfolds.

EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Join to get the flipside of crypto

Upgrade your inbox and get our DailyCoin editors’ picks 1x a week delivered straight to your inbox.

[contact-form-7] You can always unsubscribe with just 1 click.

Continue reading on DailyCoin

Meta Reportedly Shopping Its Share of Battered Stablecoin Diem
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email