Breaking News
0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Ethereum Miners Plan 51% attack

CryptocurrencyApr 05, 2021 03:00AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
Ethereum Miners Plan 51% attack

The Etherum network has come under intense scrutiny as costs for social transactions have skyrocketed. The growth of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and reliance on the Ethereum web to facilitate faster swaps between coins produced a highly profitable future for Ethereum miners. The rollout of Ethereum Improvement Proposal 1559 (EIP-1559) that is set for July 2021 has upset the mining community, which recently announced they would delegate their mining power to Ethermine on April 1st to mimic a 51% attack in a #ShowOfForce.

Miners have been vocal on Twitter and expressed their concern with Ethreum’s plan to implement EIP-1559 during London’s hard fork this July as it will slash miners’ rewards. Miners are concerned that such a change will decrease mining rewards drastically. Regardless of their concerns, EIP-1559 will be rolled out in July.

Ethereum is losing ground

The emergence of DeFi has created a prolific landscape for Ethereum miners, resulting in a steep increase in mining rewards. Users must pay a “gas” fee to the mining network, and an auction system implemented on the network allows miners to process the transaction that allocates the highest fee, thus increasing the costs for social transactions on the social network.

What will EIP-1559 do to the Ethereum network?

The new transaction scheme will change the underlying economics in the network’s existing monetary policy. Users will pay a “base fee” to the network, which is decided by the Ethereum code, similar to the current process. However, to dismiss the current high fees, users can add a tip to increase the transaction speed verification. Currently, transactions with the highest fees are filled first, giving miners an additional income boost.

According to the new proposal, the base fee will be burned and no longer allocated to the miner. This will drastically affect miners’ rewards. According to Vitaly Buterin, it will create a deflationary monetary system, which will increase the value of ether over time, and Ethereum’s native token will be seen as a store of value, similar to Bitcoin.

Ethereum’s USP has been its low fees and fast transaction time. However, in the current state of things, Ethereum users complain about high fees and delayed transactions. This is one of the primary causes for why Ethereum developers have worked to deploy Ethereum 2.0 after “London”, which will facilitate a switch from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake. However, miners that have contributed to the network’s security consider the move a “slap in the face.”

On the Flipside

  • Ethereum miners will directly affect their revenue if they show that a 51% attack is possible on the network.
  • The ‘show of force’ will speed up the development and release of Ethereum 2.0, which will actually help miners generate revenue with their holdings.
  • Lower feed on the network will enable NFT’s and DeFi to grow exponentially.
  • Ethereum Foundation, the non-profit organization overlooking the Ethereum network, could dismiss EIP-1559 and seek to find consensus with the miners.

Miner disapproval

The mining community has been outspoken against the new changes and created a website called stopeip1559 to voice their concerns. Spark Pool (NASDAQ:POOL), a popular Ehtereum mining pool, highlighted how miners which have been loyal to Ethereum are being punished for their contribution to the security of the network. They compare Ethereum’s logic with a get-rich-quick scheme, where investors and network developers only care about the token price. While this might be true, miners are still complaining that their rewards are diminishing, impacting their revenue interests.

Vocal miners such as Bits Be Trippin have discussed a planned redirection of hashing power towards a single pool to showcase how miners can directly alter Ehterum’s protocol. Gina Pari of SweBlocks mentioned a 51% attack on the network would not be beneficial for any of the parties involved as it will “speed up the transition to Ethereum 2.0, meaning that the miners would go from half-fee rewards to none”. Such a show of force will affect the price of ether and affect miners revenue directly.

Other miners have been disgusted by Ethereum’s implementation, claiming they will shut down their hashing power in the form of protest. Despite ongoing protests from miners, Tim Beiko, a ConsenSys product manager, mentioned they would be implementing ‘London’ despite the backlash from the community. While mining rewards preoccupy miners, investors applaud such initiative as it will increase the value of ether, which has already hit a new all-time high of over $2,000 on April 1st and is preparing for the subsequent push to $2,500. Mark Cuban, the celebrity investor, also intervened, proclaiming his all-in venture into Ethereum.

Continue reading on DailyCoin

Ethereum Miners Plan 51% attack
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Gayan Gunasekara
Gayan Gunasekara Apr 05, 2021 7:06PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
this is old news and never happened. stop spreading fud
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email