Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Malaria drug touted by Trump for coronavirus fails another test

Published 05/07/2020, 05:56 PM
Updated 05/07/2020, 06:00 PM

By Gene Emery

(Reuters) - The malaria treatment repeatedly championed by U.S. President Donald Trump as a "game changer" in the fight against the novel coronavirus has again failed to show a benefit in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, according to a study released on Thursday.

While the study being published in the New England Journal of Medicine had certain limitations, doctors reported that the use of hydroxycholoquine neither lessened the need for patients requiring breathing assistance nor the risk of death.

"We didn't see any association between getting this medicine and the chance of dying or being intubated," lead researcher Dr. Neil Schluger told Reuters in a telephone interview. "The patients who got the drug didn't seem to do any better."

Among patients given hydroxychloroquine, 32.3% ended up needing a ventilator or dying, compared with 14.9% of patients who were not given the drug.

But doctors were more likely to give hydroxychloroquine to sicker patients, so researchers at New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Columbia University Irving Medical Center adjusted the rates to account for that. They concluded that the drug may not have hurt patients, but it clearly did not help.

Decades old hydroxychloroquine, which is also used to treat lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, also showed no benefit when combined with the antibiotic azithromycin, Schluger's team reported. Azithromycin alone also showed no benefit.

Last month, doctors at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs reported that hydroxychloroquine did not help COVID-19 patients and might pose a higher risk of death.

That analysis of medical records showed a death rate of 28% when the drug was given in addition to standard treatments, compared to 11% with standard care alone.

In the latest study, 811 patients got hydroxychloroquine and 565 did not.

Because they were not randomly assigned to receive hydroxychloroquine or a placebo, "the study should not be taken to rule out either benefit or harm" for the drug, researchers said. Randomized trials, the gold standard for tests of new therapies, should continue, they added.

But for now, "the guidance in our hospital has changed so we don't recommend giving hydroxychloroquine to hospitalized patients," said Dr. Schluger, chief of the division of pulmonary, allergy and critical care medicine at Irving.

Smaller studies, including one done in China, had suggested hydroxychloroquine might be useful, "but these were tiny studies and not of good quality. People seized on them because patients were dying," he said.

© Reuters. The spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Porto Alegre

There are currently no approved treatments for COVID-19, although Gilead Sciences Inc (NASDAQ:GILD)'s experimental antiviral drug remdesivir last week receive emergency use authorization from U.S. regulators.

Latest comments

There are currently no approved treatments for COVID-19, although Gilead Sciences Inc (NASDAQ:GILD)'s experimental antiviral drug remdesivir last week receive emergency use authorization from U.S. regulators.
it's a antiviral you twits. Has to be used early it's a little use late in the disease . they fudging the studies again because no money to be made. clearly is a prophylaxis and effective used with zinc.
They Should have seen it didnt work for a long time ago
It is stupid study neither controlled nor randomized nonsense study not worthy of reading they gave to patients about to die what  do you expect . NEJM should be ashmed to publish this garbage, Please wait for a randomozized controlled double blind study and come back It will help given early in disease mark my words' from real doctor
is Trump a doctor?
Nah, all you need to do is eat some sun tan lotion and then shoot your lungs with some good ole UV light.
Faucci himself has numerous papers on this prior to his appointment and current career. That said, just because it had some limited use in SARS-CoV (1) does not mean it can assist with this virus, which is mutating. It would be nice. But the paranoid conspiracists need to get a handle. The world is not all in on some conspiracy. If other medicos have tried and they say its a poor contender, then that's probably what it is.
I for some reason dont feel like these high up doctors can be trusted. would be interesting to see what links they may have to big pharma. big pharma has sway and I'm pretty sure they want to get rich off this deal
Fake news, ask the doctors on the front lines, it works!!
The MedCram YouTube videos were recommending hydoxychloquin weeks before Trump mentioned it. Elon Musk was also mentioning it at least a week before Trump mentioned it
Reuters is a manipulated socialist organization. they bash usa, bash Trump, bash EU, bash china, bash india, everyone! yeah, but they never bash themselves. same applies to wapo nyt. since when did a bunch of loser fake news writers climb to the top of the moral high ground??? ban fake news!!
This is calles publicity, to favor gilead. Pure lobby. Hidroxicloroquine is cheap safe and proven. Stop the coronascam
Bingo!!!
Steven and Grant - Spot on correct. If used early with a zpack, this drug works well. Socialists would rather see people die than see President Trump get credit for anything.
trump did not "tout" anything, there were numerous reports globally of response to the medication and trump said it was promising at a press conference. the media instantly started attacking everything about the drug and hoping for its failure. reuteurs, being a corrupt T.D.S globalist propaganda machine is clearly still deranged and hopeful for the drugs failure and more death. there are several studies in favor, and several studies against, corrupt media corporations like reuters are just showing you their biased anti-trump view of the world
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.