Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Analysis-Biden's next Supreme Court nominee not likely to change its rightward push

CoronavirusJan 27, 2022 06:12AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
4/4 © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The sun sets on the U.S. Supreme Court after it was reported U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer will retire at the end of this term, in Washington, U.S., January 26, 2022. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts/File Photo 2/4

By Lawrence Hurley, Andrew Chung and Jason Lange

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Joe Biden can make history by appointing the first Black woman to the U.S. Supreme Court to succeed the retiring Justice Stephen Breyer https://www.reuters.com/world/us/liberal-us-supreme-court-justice-stephen-breyer-retire-media-reports-2022-01-26, but replacing one liberal with another won't change the aggressively conservative court's trajectory.

The court has a 6-3 conservative majority bolstered by three appointments made by former Republican President Donald Trump. The new majority has recently flexed its muscles https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/aggressively-conservative-supreme-court-plunges-into-us-culture-wars-2022-01-25 by taking up major cases that could curb abortion rights, expand gun rights and bring an end to the consideration of race in university admissions.

For Democrats, Breyer's https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-justice-breyer-fortified-abortion-rights-doubted-death-penalty-2022-01-26 retirement provides a boost and a distraction from Biden's slide in popularity https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-approval-rating-drops-43-lowest-his-presidency-2022-01-20 over the last five months during surges in COVID-19 cases and deaths and Americans' frustration with the pandemic's economic toll. Opposition by two conservative Democratic senators also stalled a spending proposal that Democrats hoped would energize voters ahead of the Nov. 8 congressional elections.

Now the focus can be on the Biden White House's goal of diversifying the courts and appointing liberal judges to counteract Trump's appointments.

Biden's chance to pick a Supreme Court justice gives the White House an opportunity to tell a positive story, said Kyle Kondik, a political analyst at the University of Virginia's Center for Politics.

"It's better than what the White House has had to deal with lately," Kondik said.

Black women judges such as Washington, D.C.-based federal appeals court judge Ketanji Brown Jackson https://www.reuters.com/world/us/former-public-defender-jackson-among-possible-biden-supreme-court-picks-2022-01-26 and California Supreme Court Justice Leondra Kruger https://www.reuters.com/world/us/potential-biden-supreme-court-pick-leondra-kruger-known-moderate-california-2022-01-26 are among those likely to be in contention.

TICKING CLOCK

There is a narrow window to replace the 83-year-old Breyer. In November's elections, Republicans could regain control of the Senate. The chamber is tied 50-50, with Democrats holding majority thanks to Vice President Kamala Harris' deciding vote.

The situation is different at the Supreme Court building across the street from the Capitol, where a new liberal justice can refresh the liberal wing but is likely powerless to stop the trend of conservative rulings.

On major, politically-divisive issues, "Justice Breyer has been a pretty reliable vote for how you’d expect a Democratic-appointed justice to vote on those issues, and we could expect someone Biden nominates would vote the same way," said Kelsi Brown Corkran, a Supreme Court litigator at Georgetown University Law Center. Biden’s appointment will mean "probably very little" for the court in terms of its overall outcomes and direction," she added.

The abortion and guns cases before the court will be decided before Breyer is expected to step down at the end of the current term, which is usually the end of June. The court's conservatives seem willing, in a case from Mississippi, to undermine or even overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion nationwide and, in a case from New York, expand the right to carry firearms in public, based on oral arguments late last year.

The new justice, if confirmed by the Senate, would likely be on the bench for the start of the court's next term in October, when it will be preparing to hear the university admissions case. As with the abortion and gun cases, if the conservative justices all vote in lockstep, the liberal justices have no leverage.

"The members of the six-justice conservative majority know what they think. A new voice on the other side is unlikely to make them rethink their views," said Carolyn Shapiro, a professor at Chicago-Kent College of Law, who served as a law clerk under Breyer.

CAFETERIA COMMITTEE DUTY

Although insiders often say that a single change on a nine-justice court changes the court as a whole, junior justices generally have to wait before having a major impact.

Traditionally, initial tasks included serving on the court cafeteria committee and answering the door if someone seeks to enter the justices' private conference, where they talk about how they plan to vote in cases and which new cases to take up. The junior justice also speaks last at those meetings.

The new appointee could make waves outside the court, where the first Black woman justice would be a role model for future generations and part of an all-woman liberal minority on the bench along with Justice Elena Kagan and Justice Sonia Sotomayor. The court, with conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, would have four women justices serving together for the first time.

Chicago-Kent's Shapiro said justices in the minority can also make a broader case to the public that can over a longer period help shape the law, as conservative Justice Clarence Thomas and the late liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg have done at times.

"They can have tremendous influence that way," Shapiro said.

Analysis-Biden's next Supreme Court nominee not likely to change its rightward push
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Jamie Kent
Jamie Kent Jan 28, 2022 5:41AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
including race and gender, especially as the main determining factor for who will be considered for the position is both racist and sexist; and likely a form of illegal discrimination according to the Supreme court itself.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email