Breaking News
Black Friday SALE: Up to 54% off InvestingPro! Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

California 'veered' out of its lane in climate pact with Quebec: U.S. lawsuit

CommoditiesOct 23, 2019 06:30PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: California's Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during the California Democratic Convention in San Francisco

By Timothy Gardner, Valerie Volcovici and Sarah N. Lynch

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States on Wednesday sued California for entering a climate agreement with Canada's Quebec province, saying the state had no right to conduct foreign policy, in the latest feud between the Trump administration and the state.

President Donald Trump's administration argued in the lawsuit that California's 2013 agreement to link its emission-trading program - the centerpiece of its climate change policy - to Quebec's violates the constitution, which prohibits states from making treaties or pacts with foreign powers.

"The state of California has veered outside of its proper constitutional lane to enter into an international emissions agreement. The power to enter into such agreements is reserved to the federal government, which must be able to speak with one voice in the area of U.S. foreign policy," Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Bossert Clark said in a statement.

California, the most populous state and one of the top 10 largest economies in the world, has positioned itself as a leader on climate change action in the absence of federal leadership on the issue, setting off numerous political and legal battles with Washington.

Trump, a Republican who questions the science behind climate change, has eased regulations on the oil, gas and coal industries and intends to pull the United States out of the 2015 Paris agreement on climate change.

The U.S. Justice Department said California, state officials, the California Air Resources Board, and the Western Climate Initiative Inc entered a complex cap-and-trade emissions-curbing climate program with Quebec in 2013 without congressional approval.

California's Attorney General Xavier Becerra countered on Wednesday that the Trump administration is attempting to "chip away" at the cap and trade program it has had in place since 2012, which he said was "strengthened" by linking with Quebec.

California and Quebec's emissions-trading programs are connected through the Western Climate Initiative, a carbon market program in which governments set a steadily declining limit on emissions, and polluters that cut emissions quickly can sell credits to others that need more time.

Environmental lawyers said the three Republican and Democratic governors in California who designed the cap-and-trade system and authorized its linkage with Quebec's market were on "solid legal and constitutional ground."

'HEAD IN SAND'

California Governor Gavin Newsom said the Trump administration has a "political vendetta" against his state and its policies on climate change.

"This latest attack shows that the White House has its head in the sand when it comes to climate change and serves no purpose other than continued political retribution," he said in a statement.

Over the last few weeks, the Trump administration has gone after California on several fronts.

In September, the administration said it would revoke California's authority to set strict car pollution rules that nearly two dozen states had adopted. Those states, including New York, New Mexico and Minnesota, sued the administration to prevent Trump from blocking the California standard.

One week after that, the administration accused California of failing to enforce the U.S. Clean Air Act and threatened to withdraw billions of dollars in federal highway funds in response.

The Trump administration also last month sent a letter to Newsom, a Democrat, accusing the state of violating clean water laws https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-epa-california/trump-epa-says-california-must-protect-water-better-from-homeless-waste-idUSKBN1WB1VR by allowing human waste from homeless residents to enter its waterways.

Hundreds of former EPA employees are urging a congressional probe into whether the agency's feud with California represents retaliation for the state's failure to support Trump's political agenda.

This marks the latest in a string of lawsuits that the Justice Department has filed against California throughout the Trump administration.

The department previously sued the state over so-called "sanctuary" laws that limit how state and local authorities cooperate with immigration officials

The Justice Department has also sued over a state "net neutrality" law that aims to create an equal playing field to prevent major internet providers from blocking, slowing down or giving preferential access to online content.

Legal experts said it is unclear whether the Trump administration can break up California and Quebec's agreement because there is no legal precedent.

“There much uncertainty in this area of U.S. constitutional law because the courts have not made many rulings in this area," said David Wright, a law professor at the University of Calgary.

He said the legal limbo may affect market confidence in the joint emissions trading system.

California 'veered' out of its lane in climate pact with Quebec: U.S. lawsuit
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (7)
Rita Brattkus
Rita Brattkus Oct 24, 2019 12:22AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Newsom is destroying my California. Abusing the law like all democrats. He will be recalled with over 2 millions signatures, still climbing.
Rita Brattkus
Rita Brattkus Oct 24, 2019 12:18AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Are my comments too conservative?
Rita Brattkus
Rita Brattkus Oct 24, 2019 12:15AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Newsom's aunt Pelosi is dictating his illegal dealings. Californians will succeed in kicking him out of office.
Al Vlaj
alvlaj Oct 23, 2019 8:16PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
California should secede as should NE/NY/NJ. States rights are more important than Federal and the US experiment has clearly failed. Time to start over.
Buzzy Jefferson
Buzzy Jefferson Oct 23, 2019 4:45PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
His name is "Gavin", and he hates America, loves public defecation, and cares more about illegal aliens than citizens. What could go wrong?
Ave Joe
Ave Joe Oct 23, 2019 4:39PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Gavin Newsome wants to break California off from the US as a separate country. California has declared small business owners public enemy #1 while Gavin Newsome gets paid over 200,000 per year while the middle class becomes homeless. RECALL Newsome now
Randy Randy
randy00 Oct 23, 2019 11:46AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
And the joke goes on.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email