Breaking News
0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Trump era aluminum tariffs have revived U.S. industry - think-tank

CommoditiesMay 25, 2021 06:10PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A metal worker clears a slag off the top of molten aluminum in a siphoning crucible at Century Aluminum Company in Hawesville, Kentucky, U.S. May 14, 2019. Picture taken May 14, 2019. REUTERS/Bryan Woolston

By David Lawder

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. tariffs on aluminum imports imposed since the Trump presidency have led to increased output, employment and capital investment by domestic manufacturers, according to a new report from the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute.

The study https://www.epi.org/publication/aluminum-producing-and-consuming-industries-have-thrived-under-u-s-section-232-import-measures released by the Washington-based think-tank on Tuesday said the "Section 232" 10% aluminum tariffs, introduced in March 2018 and still in place under President Joe Biden, have led to $6 billion in 57 downstream aluminum product projects.

These projects will employ over 4,500 additional workers and add more than 1.1 million metric tons in annual rolling and extrusion capacity, according to the report.

"The resurgence of the U.S. aluminum industry — with minimal apparent knock-on effects in other parts of the economy — belies claims by critics, pundits, and representatives of many firms in downstream industries, who argued that the Section 232 tariffs would have a devastating negative impact on a wide range of domestic industries," EPI economists Adam Hersh and Robert Scott wrote in the report.

The report also credited the tariffs with a 37.6% increase in primary aluminum smelting between March 2018 and February 2020, compared with the prior two-year period, adding 1,095 jobs and reviving an industry that had been devastated by subsidized imports from China, India, Russia and the Gulf.

EPI's former president, trade economist Thea Lee, earlier this month was appointed by the Biden administration to head the Labor Department's international affairs bureau, an office that helps enforce workers' rights provisions in U.S. trade agreements..

The new study comes as U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai begins talks with European Union counterparts to resolve disputes over the U.S. tariffs on EU steel and aluminum.

U.S. steel industry groups, citing a similar EPI study backing https://www.epi.org/publication/why-global-steel-surpluses-warrant-u-s-section-232-import-measures the Section 232 steel tariffs, urged Biden last week to keep those tariffs in place.

The report argues that the causal relationship between primary aluminum prices and those of end-use goods made from aluminum, including canned beer, construction products, furniture and motor vehicle bodies, shows the effects to be "statistically zero to economically trivial."

WHISKEY WOES QUESTIONED

The EPI also said that retaliatory 25% EU tariffs on American whiskey introduced in June 2018 have not hurt overall production, citing annualized volume growth of 6.8% from 2017 to 2020, faster than the previous three years' rates. While it acknowledged EU-bound whiskey exports fell, it noted exports to the rest of the world are also down.

"U.S. whiskey producers found more profitable uses in domestic markets for the whiskey they were already producing," the study said.

Distilled Spirits Council spokeswoman Lisa Hawkins (NASDAQ:HWKN) disagreed with the EPI report's conclusions, saying that small craft distillers have been hit especially hard by the tariffs, which cut U.S. whiskey exports to the EU by 37% and the UK by 53%.

"It doesn’t take an economist to see that these tariffs are having a devastating impact on the U.S. distilled spirits industry," she added.

Trump era aluminum tariffs have revived U.S. industry - think-tank
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (2)
Mase Gumbo
Mase Gumbo May 25, 2021 11:51AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
forgot to mention theyre illegal you more on..
Felipe Daniel
Felipe Daniel May 25, 2021 11:34AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Biden cannot take the credit for any tarrifs placed by Trump on China. For Biden is a China first foreign policy.
David David
David9 May 25, 2021 11:34AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
There is no choice... Trump and Biden both ha e to bend to China.... they just want to act tough for political gains, but in reality all have to deal with China or risk falling behind ...
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email