Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

How a dispute over coal nearly sank the Glasgow Climate Pact

Published 11/14/2021, 12:32 PM
Updated 11/14/2021, 01:16 PM
© Reuters. COP26 President Alok Sharma receives applause during the UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) in Glasgow, Scotland, Britain November 13, 2021. REUTERS/Phil Noble

By Valerie Volcovici

GLASGOW (Reuters) - It was very nearly a diplomatic disaster.

Alok Sharma, the president of the U.N. climate conference in Scotland, had convened the final meeting of representatives from nearly 200 countries to deliver the Glasgow Climate Pact, a deal meant to ensure the world still has a chance to avert the worst impacts of global warming.

It was moment born of weeks of arduous negotiation and months of painstaking preparations. Delegates in the plenary hall at COP26 were taking pictures to mark the historic moment.

But as envoys prepared to take their seats to adopt the accord on Saturday night, an unresolved dispute over coal threatened to derail it, and most of the people in the room had no idea.

China, India, and other developing nations rich in coal reserves were threatening to scupper the deal over language that asked governments to “phase out” their use of coal, a demand they considered unfair and damaging to their hopes of economic growth.

U.S. special climate envoy John Kerry had been working the room and caught wind of the issue while chatting with his Chinese counterpart Xie Zhenhua. Days earlier the two men had boosted morale at the summit by unveiling a surprise joint declaration in which Beijing promised to ramp up its ambition to cut emissions.

“You’re supposed to be phasing out coal over the next 20 years, you just signed an agreement with us,” Kerry told Xie as they stood together in the buzzing plenary hall.

Xie, through his translator responded: "We said phase down."

Moments later, as other country delegations milled about waiting for the plenary to open, Kerry, Xie, and their counterparts from the European Union and India left the room to meet privately. They came out of their meeting about 30 minutes later.

When Xie returned he told a Reuters reporter that “we have a deal” and gave a thumbs up.

That deal was introduced to the room awkwardly.

As Sharma finally opened the meeting and began the process of adopting the accord, China and India intervened. It was India that laid out their last-minute proposal: The coal “phase out” would become a “phase down”, said Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav.

Sharma, standing at the podium, looked as though he was about to cry. He apologized to the plenary, and then asked if the proposal was acceptable.

Despite withering criticism from nations ranging from Switzerland to Mexico, who were concerned a "phase down" would open the door to endless coal use, none were willing to leave Glasgow without a deal. And so it passed.

The dissatisfied envoys were allowed to speak. Then Sharma asked the plenary to support passage of the deal, and with no delegates formally objecting, he tapped his gavel to indicate it had passed.

Asked about getting emotional on stage, Sharma later told reporters: "I've had about six hours sleep in the last three days. But you know, look, it is emotional, in the sense that collectively, as a team, we have achieved what I suspect, very many people doubted."

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: India's Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav attends the UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) in Glasgow, Scotland, Britain November 13, 2021. REUTERS/Phil Noble/File Photo

In an accord already jammed with compromises, this was just one more.

For Kerry, who helped to broker it, it was the one that held the Glasgow Climate Pact together. "If we hadn’t done that we wouldn’t have an agreement,” he told reporters.

Latest comments

who cares...
climate change would disappear without these people and MSM
you are very right sir!
Welcome to the 10th Century ! (They were ignorant but what's OUR excuse ??) Tic-toc.
Name & shame the UK officials who refused to phase out fossil fuel exploration, Subsides, Accepting bribes [lobying], lying to the public, Funding Coal mining & Petrochemicals. Claiming funds under management is funding that will ever be spent on renewables. You do not need to pay companies to transition... theyve all made huge profits for decades.. Let them deal with it.!! List the officials who care more about their profits, backhanders & their fat pension funds to care about the AIR & the HUMANS who live here...
To those who Cop'd Out !!  Greed & Money matters more than clean air & human lives...  name & shame... Then boycott them all Name our own UK officials who refused to phase out Coal subsides, investment & new mining licenses. Make them accountable for their profit & backhander / lobying bribe based decisions...
doesn't make a difference, China and India are disgusting countries. they have grown accustomed to living in filth and polluting the word for their economic development. the irony is once those countries become developed, there won't be a world left to do business in
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.