Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Drillers ask U.S. to exempt smallest wells from looming methane rule

Published 11/02/2022, 07:04 AM
Updated 11/02/2022, 03:37 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The sun is seen behind a crude oil pump jack in the Permian Basin in Loving County, Texas, U.S., November 22, 2019. REUTERS/Angus Mordant

By Valerie Volcovici and Nichola Groom

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Oil and gas companies have asked the Biden administration to exempt hundreds of thousands of the nation's smallest wells from upcoming rules requiring drillers to find and plug leaks of methane, according to industry groups, despite studies showing they emit huge amounts of the powerful greenhouse gas.

The Independent Petroleum Association of America and a coalition of some 20 state drillers' associations have asked the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to exclude wells producing less than 6 barrels per day from the rule, arguing that including them would be costly and inefficient, according to the IPAA and the Kansas Independent Oil & Gas Association.

An EPA official declined to confirm the request or discuss details of the upcoming proposal.

Oil and gas production is the source of around a third of the nation's methane emissions and is a key target for the Biden administration as it seeks to combat climate change. The United States is among over 100 countries that have pledged to cut their methane emissions 30% by 2030 from 2020 levels.

Biden's EPA last year unveiled a proposal that would require oil and gas companies to monitor 300,000 of their biggest well sites every three months to find and fix leaks, ban the venting of methane produced as a byproduct of crude oil into the atmosphere, and require upgrades to equipment such as storage tanks, compressors, and pneumatic pumps.

Those rules will most likely take effect in 2023 and are aimed at slashing methane from oil and gas operations by 74% from 2005 levels by 2035, an amount equivalent to the emissions created by all U.S. passenger cars and planes in 2019, according to an EPA summary.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

But the rules left aside how the industry should manage methane emissions from its smaller "marginal" wells - those producing less than 15 barrels per day - an issue that will be dealt with in the EPA's supplemental ruling expected in the coming weeks. A source familiar with the administration's plans said the supplemental proposal could be announced at the United Nations climate conference in Egypt in November.

Groups representing the owners of low producing wells have told EPA officials they lack the resources to monitor all their sites with the latest technology. They also say smaller wells often produce only insignificant methane emissions that don't warrant the cost and effort of a monitoring program.

"Deal with the stuff where you know the emissions are coming from, don't just mandate something that goes across the board whether you have a one barrel a day well or a 15 barrel a day well," said Lee Fuller, environment and general strategy officer for the IPAA.

The problem, environmentalists say, is that collectively, the smaller wells produce a massive amount of climate-damaging methane.

Studies from the Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NYSE:LH), and from environmental group EDF (EPA:EDF), both issued this year, show that more than half of methane emitted from U.S. well sites comes from the more than 700,000 sites that produce less than 15 barrels a day.

Exempting wells that produce less than 6 barrels per day would effectively exclude more than 80% of those marginal wells from the EPA rule, according to KIOGA.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"The fact that those studies show that half of the problem comes from these wells shows that you can't leave half of the pie on the table," said Jon Goldstein, who leads EDF's efforts to regulate oil and gas operations.

Industry groups have also pressed the EPA to allow companies to use new or less expensive technology to scan for leaks to reduce costs, instead of optical gas imaging cameras that can cost tens of thousands of dollars and require intensive training.

The supplemental ruling could also address the industry's use of flaring, or the deliberate burning of excess natural gas from well sites, which can also lead to methane emissions.

Latest comments

If the EPA doesn't drop the requirements on these 6bpd wells then they should sue the EPA like they did over their attempt to shut down coal power plants. The court ruled that only Congress had the authority to make such drastic rulings. This administration has Weaponized all the federal agencies and thankfully the courts have continued to rule against their insanity.
I agree.
Oil companies receiving record profits in $billions should pay for the methane reduction methods coming from wells they get oil from whether it's their own or wells they buy oil from.  Again wealth going to a few greedy corps and execs while the,little guys and consumers pay including the damage to he environment
spoken like a true Marxist. Oil companies risk billions in order to make billions. Now the left want a share in their profits? Will they also guarantee them not losing money during downturns?
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.