Breaking News
0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Chinese dams held back Mekong waters during drought, study finds

CommoditiesApr 13, 2020 08:15AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
3/3 © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A general view of the future site of the Luang Prabang dam is seen on the Mekong River outskirt of Luang Prabang province 2/3

By Kay Johnson

BANGKOK (Reuters) - China's Mekong River dams held back large amounts of water during a damaging drought in downstream countries last year despite China having higher-than-average water levels upstream, a U.S. research company said in a study.

China's government disputed the findings, saying there was low rainfall during last year's monsoon season on its portion of the 4,350-km (2,700-mile) river.

The findings by Eyes on Earth Inc., a research and consulting company specialising in water, published in a U.S.-government funded study, could complicate tricky discussions between China and other Mekong countries on how to manage the river that supports 60 million people as it flows past Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and through Cambodia and Vietnam.

Last year's drought, which saw the Lower Mekong at its lowest levels in more than 50 years, devastated farmers and fishermen and saw the massive river recede to expose sandbanks along some stretches and at others turned from its usual murky brown to bright blue https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mekong-river/green-algae-blue-water-add-to-fears-over-health-of-southeast-asias-mekong-idUSKBN1Z919K because waters were so shallow and lacking in sediment.

"If the Chinese are stating that they were not contributing to the drought, the data does not support that position,” said Alan Basist, a meteorologist and president of Eyes on Earth, which conducted the study with funding from the U.S. State Department's Lower Mekong Initiative.

Instead, satellite measurements of “surface wetness” in China’s Yunnan province, through which the Upper Mekong flows, suggest the region in 2019 actually had slightly above-average combined rainfall and snowmelt during the May to October wet season.

But water levels measured downstream from China along the Thai-Lao border were at times up to 3 metres (10 feet) lower than they should have been, the group said in the study.

That suggests China is "not letting the water out during the wet season, even when the restriction of water from China has a severe impact of the drought experienced downstream", Basist said.

TROUBLED WATERS

The effect of China's 11 dams on the upper Mekong has long been debated, but data has been scarce because China does not release detailed records of how much water the dams are using to fill their reservoirs, which Eyes on Earth says have a combined capacity of more than 47 billion cubic metres.

China - which has no formal water treaties with the lower Mekong countries - promised to cooperate https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mekong-river/china-says-will-help-manage-mekong-as-report-warns-of-dam-danger-idUSKBN20E20T on management of the river and also to investigate the causes of last year's record drought.

But the United States, which has been challenging China's growing influence in Southeast Asia, has said that Beijing essentially controls the Mekong. Last year in Bangkok, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo blamed the drought on "China’s decision to shut off water upstream".

The study used satellite data taken with Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounder (SSMI/S) technology to detect water on the surface from rain and snowmelt in China's portion of the Mekong River Basin from 1992 to late 2019.

It then compared that data with river-level readings by the Mekong River Commission at Thailand’s Chiang Saen Hydrological Station, the closest station to China, to create a predictive model of "natural" levels for the river given a certain amount of upstream rainfall and snowmelt.

In the early years of the data, from 1992, the predictive model and the river measurements tracked generally closely.

'UNREASONABLE'

But starting in 2012, when the larger of China’s upper Mekong hydropower dams came online, the model and the river level readings started to diverge most years, coinciding with periods of the Chinese dams’ reservoirs filling up during rainy seasons and releasing water during the dry season.

The difference was especially pronounced in 2019, Basist said.

The study focused only on waters flowing out of China, and did not look further downstream, where Laos https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mekong-river-dam/amid-hydropower-boom-laos-streams-ahead-on-latest-mekong-dam-idUSKBN2010B8 opened two new mainstream Mekong dams in late 2019.

China dismissed the findings.

"The explanation that China's dam building on the Lancang River is causing downstream droughts is unreasonable," the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement to Reuters, referring to the river by its Chinese name.

The ministry said Yunnan province saw serious drought last year and reservoir volumes at China's dams on the river fell to their historically lowest levels.

“Despite this, China has continued to do its utmost to guarantee reasonable discharge volumes” to countries downstream, the ministry said.

That assertion, however, is inconsistent with the new study's data, said Brian Eyler, Southeast Asia programme director of the Stimson Center think-tank in Washington.

“Either Beijing is lying or their dam operators are lying to them. Somewhere, someone isn’t telling the truth," Eyler said.

Chinese dams held back Mekong waters during drought, study finds
 

Related Articles

Gold Up Thanks to Declining Dollar, U.S. Bond Yields
Gold Up Thanks to Declining Dollar, U.S. Bond Yields By Investing.com - Oct 19, 2021

By Gina Lee Investing.com – Gold was up on Tuesday morning in Asia, thanks to declines in both the dollar and U.S. bond yields that provided some support to the yellow metal. Gold...

Oil Prices Remain Steady After Reaching High
Oil Prices Remain Steady After Reaching High By Investing.com - Oct 18, 2021

By Gina Lee Investing.com - Oil prices continued its high on Tuesday after starting the week at its its highest level in years. Brent Oil Futures hovered at $84.33 at 11:07 PM ET...

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (5)
Chris Vu
Chris Vu Apr 15, 2020 6:33AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
This is one way for China to exert demands from the countries below--even if it affects the livelihoods of the people who depend on the water to grow rice or fish. Despicable Chinese government.
Prakash J Chaudhari
Prakash J Chaudhari Apr 13, 2020 10:35PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Expecting Trust , integrety , truth from the country stealing from everywhere and saying reverse engineering. Closed data , artificial statistics all provide the direction to china treating rest of entire world as their enemy similar to Islamic world treating the world as Kafirs . Both are enemy of humanity and this planet earth.
yue dai
yue dai Apr 13, 2020 9:31AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
CIA
Thomas DeVito
Thomas DeVito Apr 13, 2020 8:30AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
China is, and has been, at war with everyone but everyone is too politically correct/paid off to do anything about it.
Jonathan Sim
Jonathan Sim Apr 13, 2020 7:33AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
who else still listen to US ? Yes, for the wrong reason
Mike ND
Mike ND Apr 13, 2020 7:33AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Pull all your money outta US stocks then and put it into China stocks.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email