Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Trump says he does not want war after attack on Saudi oil facilities

Published 09/17/2019, 01:21 AM
Updated 09/17/2019, 01:21 AM
© Reuters. Official spokesperson for the Saudi-led coalition fighting in Yemen, Colonel Turki Al-Malik, displays on a screen an Aramco oil facility during a news conference, in Riyadh

By Steve Holland and Rania El Gamal

WASHINGTON/DUBAI (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday said it looked like Iran was behind attacks on oil plants in Saudi Arabia but stressed he did not want to go to war, as the attacks sent oil prices soaring and raised fears of a new Middle East conflict.

Iran has rejected U.S. charges it was behind the strikes on Saturday that damaged the world's biggest crude-processing plant and triggered the largest jump in crude prices in decades.

Relations between the United States and Iran have deteriorated since Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear accord last year and reimposed sanctions over Tehran's nuclear and ballistic programs. Washington also wants to pressure Tehran to end its support of regional proxy forces, including in Yemen where Saudi forces have been fighting Iran-backed Houthis for four years.

The United States was still investigating if Iran was behind the Saudi strikes, Trump said, but "it's certainly looking that way at this moment".

Trump, who has spent much of his presidency trying to disentangle the United States from wars he inherited, made clear, however, he was not going to rush into a new conflict on behalf of Saudi Arabia.

"I'm somebody that would like not to have war," Trump said.

Several U.S. Cabinet members, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Energy Secretary Rick Perry, have blamed Tehran for the strikes. Pompeo and others will travel to Saudi Arabia soon, Trump said.

A day after saying the United States was "locked and loaded" to respond to the incident, Trump said on Monday there was "no rush" to do so.

"We have a lot of options but I'm not looking at options right now. We want to find definitively who did this," he said.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said the strikes were carried out by "Yemeni people" retaliating for attacks by a Saudi-led military coalition in a war with the Houthi movement.

"Yemeni people are exercising their legitimate right of defense," Rouhani told reporters during a visit to Ankara.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi called the allegations "unacceptable and entirely baseless."

The attacks cut 5% of world crude oil production.

Oil prices surged by as much as 19% after the incidents, the biggest intraday jump since the 1990-91 Gulf crisis over Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Prices retreated from their peak after Trump said he would release U.S. emergency supplies and producers said there were enough stocks globally to make up for the shortfall.

Japan said it will consider coordinated release of its oil reserves and other measures if needed to ensure sufficient supplies in the wake of the attacks.

Crude prices were down around 1% in Asian trade on Tuesday.

"The question is how long it takes for the supply to get back online," said Esty Dwek, head of global market strategy at Natixis Investment Managers.

"However, the (geopolitical) risk premium ... which has been basically ignored by markets in favor of growth worries in recent months, is likely to be priced in going forward," she said.

SAUDI SUSPICIONS

Saudi Arabia said the attacks were carried out with Iranian weapons and urged U.N. experts to help investigate the raid.

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman said Iranian threats were not only directed against the kingdom but against the Middle East and the world.

While the prince did not directly accuse Tehran, a Foreign Ministry statement reported him as calling on the international community to condemn whoever was behind the strike.

"The kingdom is capable of defending its land and people and responding forcefully to those attacks," the statement added.

Saudi Arabia and Iran have been enemies for decades and are fighting a number of proxy wars.

Trump said he had not made commitments to protect the Saudis.

"No, I haven't promised Saudis that. We have to sit down with the Saudis and work something out," he said. "That was an attack on Saudi Arabia, and that wasn't an attack on us. But we would certainly help them."

Two sources briefed on state oil company Saudi Aramco's operations told Reuters it might take months for Saudi oil production to return to normal. Earlier estimates had suggested it could take weeks.

Saudi Arabia said it would be able to meet oil customers' demand from its ample storage, although some deliveries had been disrupted. At least 11 supertankers were waiting to load oil cargoes from Saudi ports, ship tracking data showed on Monday.

Graphic for attacks on Saudi oil: https://graphics.reuters.com/SAUDI-ARAMCO/0100B29Q1C3/index.html

RISING TENSIONS

Tension in the oil-producing Gulf region has dramatically escalated this year after Trump imposed severe U.S. sanctions on Iran aimed at halting its oil exports altogether.

For months, Iranian officials have issued veiled threats, saying that if Tehran is blocked from exporting oil, other countries will not be able to do so either. But Iran has denied a role in specific attacks, including bombings of tankers in the Gulf and previous strikes claimed by the Houthis.

Trump has said the goal from his "maximum pressure" approach is to force Iran to negotiate a tougher agreement and has left open the possibility of talks with Rouhani at an upcoming U.N. meeting. Iran says there can be no talks until Washington lifts sanctions.

U.N. Yemen envoy Martin Griffiths told the U.N. Security Council on Monday it was "not entirely clear" who was behind the strike but he said it had increased the chances of a regional conflict.

But the U.S. ambassador to the world body, Kelly Craft, said emerging information on the attacks "indicates that responsibility lies with Iran" and there is no evidence it came from Yemen.

Iran's Yemeni allies have promised more strikes to come. Houthi military spokesman Yahya Sarea said the group carried out Saturday's predawn attack with drones, including some powered by jet engines.

"We assure the Saudi regime that our long arm can reach any place we choose and at the time of our choosing," Sarea tweeted. "We warn companies and foreigners against being near the plants that we struck because they are still in our sights."

U.S. officials say they believe the attacks came from the opposite direction, possibly from Iran itself rather than Yemen, and may have involved cruise missiles. Wherever the attacks were launched, however, they believe Iran is to blame.

The attacks have raised questions about how Saudi Arabia, one of the world's top spenders on weaponry, much of it supplied by U.S. companies, was unable to protect oil plants from attack.

Sensing a commercial opening, President Vladimir Putin said Russia was ready to help Saudi Arabia by providing Russian-made air defense systems to protect Saudi infrastructure.

© Reuters. Official spokesperson for the Saudi-led coalition fighting in Yemen, Colonel Turki Al-Malik, displays on a screen an Aramco oil facility during a news conference, in Riyadh

Russia and China said it was wrong to jump to conclusions about who was to blame for the attack on Saudi Arabia.

Latest comments

He said Biden is weak and now I doubt.
Should Saudi get hit again, $100 oil is not impossible.
wimpy trump only cares about reelection chances not the American people. No choice here but to strike Iran hard
He doesn’t want war w/ iran And it doesn’t mean that he won’t strike Iran better watch out
Expect oil pull back below $60 tomorrow.
It seems it is going talks instead of strikes. That means damages will be repaired on expedited time, and Oil goes back to $57’sh per barrel.
Doesnt want war? Isnt that up to Saudis as he awaits their instruction? ...
It's an Asymmetric Warfare be ready for Uncle Sam : Recession, mostly forced this time
Especially keeping high Oil price would harm chinese U.S dollar liquidity. 1. They should pay more Oil price with U.S dollar, and 2. They should use U.S dollar to make their Yuan have proper value.........because of 1 and 2, their U.S dollar liquidity would become more bad. They can't handle economy with such Dollar liquidity.
But Chinese retaliation on this can adjust oil on Shanghai Futures and subsequently Yuan moves in Correlation... which can ****** US off
expected effects : attack anti america country + selling U.S oil at high price + selling U.S weapons in arab area + make china spend huge U.S dollar continuously by Oil price + warning North korea with another military action + requiring allies to support military action
Word to word is Absolutely correct
We should mind our own business and not get pulled into another war. We are done with wars.
I am pretty sure this attack was planned by both Saudis and Iranians to make more money
Not with 188 million barrels in reserve. The Saudis can't stand Iran.
Well said.. They always wanted crude price to be higher and this is one of the way
The Saudis had to take one for the team so global oil producers could hedge their production costs! Thats my tinfoil hat take of the day.
Both Reuters and Bloomberg are outdoing each other to make it appear as though as Trump is ready to hit Iran when he really is not. Trump sends out dozens of tweets he never means and this is one of them. In this, he NEVER named Iran. It's the hawks in his administration who are doing so, more of the Bolton types -- the ones that Trump really doesn't care about. There are serious policy conflicts at the White House over Iran. On one hand, Trump officials are trying to push through with his initial "maximum pain" campaign on Iran. On the other, the president himself is coolly trying to make a deal with his Iranian counterpart Hassan Rouhani, which he can then gloat about on the 2020 campaign trail. The Bloomberg story with the same "locked and loaded" headline talks as much about Trump's propensity to continue angling for a deal with Rouhani.
Trump clearly isnt a wartime president. All of this reminds me of the weak kid getting kicked in the pants. When he turns around and asks who did it, the other kids deny. This continues until the kid grows a pair and retaliates. Trump foolishly claimed the markets without realizing that there are decisions to be made that directly effect them. The US is now the old lion being challenged by the younger generation. The outcome is obvious. No matter what route he takes, the US is done.
Plenty of oil, who cares
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.