The classic reply of somebody who A) cannot read comprehensively, B) cannot understand a simple phases such as “most likely” in the title, C) thus does not understand the concept of probabilities of possibility, D) therefore falsely thinks financial markets are an absolute certainty. Hence, why such persons will only negatively comment on articles they cannot understand and will never be an author of an article. But then again, for every winner there is a loser. Such is life. Moving on.
i have studied it for soon 15 years ;-) but no I think this Bull is not done yet. At least imho preferrably 1 more wave higher for some indexes. Others may need even 2 more up legs. All depends on if the recent lows in March hold or not. i have studied it for soon 15 years ;-) but no I think this Bull is not done yet. At least imho preferrably 1 more wave higher for some indexes. Others may need even 2 more up legs. All depends on if the recent lows in March hold or not.
that's fine if it does. As I said "With a few more twists and turns along the way"... It is impossible to know and foresee each and every twist and turn. Thus, my question is: "What happens after it reaches 0?" If you can tell us that, that be great to know, and where one's real forecasting accuracy and power lies. Everyone can nail a turn, few can nail turns consistently. That is what separates the men from the boys, the amateurs from the pros, the commenters from the authors. that's fine if it does. As I said "With a few more twists and turns along the way"... It is impossible to know and foresee each and every twist and turn. Thus, my question is: "What happens after it reaches $680?" If you can tell us that, that be great to know, and where one's real forecasting accuracy and power lies. Everyone can nail a turn, few can nail turns consistently. That is what separates the men from the boys, the amateurs from the pros, the commenters from the authors.
another useless comment. Given I write the articles and you only get to respond means you are an amateur. Why don't you become an author with investing.com? They only hire pros. Since you are not an author you are thus an amateur. Not me. Step aside. I don't see why my article is clickbait, as there's nothing to click on in my article other than to an educational section about the EWP... Maybe read it and learn something?!? Market breadth?!? Why? There's no "market breadth" in BTC because there's only 1 item traded... BTC... All the rest is interesting but would lead to a 10-page report I can't get published here. Oh and btw, look where BTC is now... Green path... Lastly, I don't see why my personal finances are of importance as you have no idea about my personal wealth. Takes millions to make millions. And if I don't have millions it will take a while to make them... another useless comment. Given I write the articles and you only get to respond means you are an amateur. Why don't you become an author with investing.com? They only hire pros. Since you are not an author you are thus an amateur. Not me. Step aside. I don't see why my article is clickbait, as there's nothing to click on in my article other than to an educational section about the EWP... Maybe read it and learn something?!? Market breadth?!? Why? There's no "market breadth" in BTC because there's only 1 item traded... BTC... All the rest is interesting but would lead to a 10-page report I can't get published here. Oh and btw, look where BTC is now... Green path... Lastly, I don't see why my personal finances are of importance as you have no idea about my personal wealth. Takes millions to make millions. And if I don't have millions it will take a while to make them...
No. I treat each instrument on their own merit. Aapl and SPX are not 100% correlated. I think SPX6000 is too bold a call, often when those calls occur they don’t happen as one has fallen pray to one’s own bias and assumes you can foresee the markets years ahead...
If you’d taken the time to read my articles you would realize how often I have been able to correctly forecast the path stock markets, individual stocks and crypto currencies would take over the coming days, weeks and months. Alas, often folks confuse their own limited understanding and unwillingness to learn comprehensively with something that supposedly then doesn’t work. As usual the blame lies with others, but not their own -unecessarily- limited (mental!?) capacity.
Hi, thanks but please note that 4 weeks ago I found "Thus, as long as $600 holds, which is the lower end of the red wave-b target zone, and ideally today’s low hold, I expect the next move higher towards $800-825 to get going soon, targeting $815 ideally. Once this red intermediate wave-c of black major-b completes, I expect the next leg lower: wave-c of blue Primary-IV to ideally $450+/-25."
So far so good as $600 held on a closing basis. Intra-day it went to as low as $591... pardon my $9 (1.5%) inaccuracy...
Besides, 6 weeks ago I wrote "The three waves up are currently in progress, and the first wave has likely completed (red wave-a). The second wave is now underway (red wave-b) to ideally $625+/-25, from where the next move higher (red wave-c) should kick into ideally $825+/-25 for a typical wave-C=wave-A relationship"
Again, pardon my inaccuracy as we got $591 and not $600... I honestly don't think there's a method that can forecast this precisely.