So far you have only focused on the short-term, and are unable to provide any substantive analyses of your own. It is so easy to critique, but few have anything constructive to say at all. Btw, indexes have been going sideways. No melt down.
lmao, this comment can ALWAYS be expected, because LMCP's like you "always wants to know exactly what's next", failing to recognize "there are simply times when things are less clear, and we must let the market communicate"... but ignorance is bliss ;-)
yes, I clearly did call it 4 months ago. Hard to argue against that. What more does one want? And no I am not retracing my claim, you are simply unable to read my article correctly, and are cherry-picking, as you seem to miss that I wrote several times
"Price will have to drop below $190s to suggest a much larger top is already in place. But as was said before, the charts do not support this notion at this stage."
Well, now I present that notion, i.e., EWP option, because I already had it in my books, but simply did not share it with the world to avoid confusing the already confused...
LOL, that was not cherry-picked, but the first time I forecasted (forecasting is not predicting btw!) 15135 would be reached. Hence, it is appropriate to reference that article to establish the proper baseline to see if that forecast came to fruition or not. And it did because somehow I still found on December 14 the NDX would hit 15135...And voila here we are 15165... Nobody knows the exact path a market will take to get there, but one can forecast pretty darn accurately where it will top and bottom using the right analytical tools. When and how is a whole other question. Now, let's revisit this comment by MA when the NDX tops at 17400-18000+
Yes that would be possible but not now. Next year. My premium members get of course updates like this for the SPX daily. Anybody else will have to wait until i have time to write an article. Thanks!
yes, everything is possible, but which is most probable. I outlined the most probable scenarios. trade them accordingly or not at all. we have the breakdown and breakout levels to watch. so it is not too difficult.
Always possible indeed, as technically enough price "damage" was done and three waves down from the ATH completed. Thus we must respect that and at least expect three waves back up. Price clearly has stalled so far at my initial ideal bounce target zone I told my premium members it would last week, so now the markets have a choice. Simple! Now let the market speak, listen and we will know, ensuring the next lowest risk trade, which is not now! However, timing-wise this correction for a larger 4th wave was too short. Now price is the final arbiter and now time, but it would be weird to see a degree higher 4th wave last 1/2 as long as a degree smaller 4th wave (September correction)...
Yes the markets have at any given moment in time that option. Tell us something new. We need to then identify which it will most likely be. Breach of key price levels will tell us that. As said, the easy part of this rally maybe already over. Now we let the market decide. My premium members already knew last week to look higher. Target zones reached!
Dont equate one’s failure to understand the c-waves in different flat corrections with my work not being helpful. Read up on the EWP or stay ignorant. Your choice…
thank you! KA, trolls will be trolls. very few people are open-minded, want to learn, or want to even try to put in an effort to remotely understand certain concepts. you are one of few. these trolls are what I call "online click-n-jerk heroes". dime a dozen. but when push comes to shove they have nothing to show for as inside they are actually frightened, insecure, and unintelligent. Hence, their comments as they are.
volume is not that important as long as total $ amount traded stays the same: buying 1000 shares at 206728517 is taking the same risk as buying 1 share at 00. Volume has dropped a factor of 1000, but one is still taking the same risk. Its called “churn”. volume is not that important as long as total $ amount traded stays the same: buying 1000 shares at $1 is taking the same risk as buying 1 share at $1000. Volume has dropped a factor of 1000, but one is still taking the same risk. Its called “churn”.