and what is your background? Your profile is E M P T Y... Better trust Peter folks. He's for N O T H I N G to show for and thus ******es on other folks' analyses. I use my analytical skills -trained for many years as a scientist- to objectively and logically deduct, where the markets are most likely going to go next. and what is your background? Your profile is E M P T Y... Better trust Peter folks. He's for N O T H I N G to show for and thus ******es on other folks' analyses. I use my analytical skills -trained for many years as a scientist- to objectively and logically deduct, where the markets are most likely going to go next.
thanks! I proved all the naysayers on my first article about this wedge wrong. All comments back then were negative. Goes to show. But opinions don't pay, acting on price patterns does!
Sigh… still living in the past aren’t ya!? Nobody only makes correct calls. I am only human. Get over it. Move on. Take these 5 historical signals’ returns for what they are and stop bitching, moaning and complaining. That goes for most of you on here btw. Bunch of losers.
Probably to my premium major market service. In 9 out of 10 cases folks fail to follow up when they are referred to how to cancel their subscription and then blame me for it when they do not do it in time. Also note, that 9 out 10 folks subscribe near market tops and cancel near market bottoms whereas they should do the exact opposite... ;-) Probably to my premium major market service. In 9 out of 10 cases folks fail to follow up when they are referred to how to cancel their subscription and then blame me for it when they do not do it in time. Also note, that 9 out 10 folks subscribe near market tops and cancel near market bottoms whereas they should do the exact opposite... ;-)
I dunno who you are, but you manage your subscriptions in your PayPal profile. I am not here to babysit your subscriptions. That's your own responsibility.
As I said "Please remember, my work is ~70% reliable and ~95% accurate. I am not a prophet. Thus, be realistic and do not expect perfection and zero bad calls in a dynamic, stochastic, probabilistic environment." This goes for all market analysts btw. NASDAQ target is still good for $18K believe it or not.
thank you. Most suffer from "don't confuse me with the facts I already made up my mind" syndrome. Then they pull out a month's old article I wrote they didn't even read or comprehended and say "he was wrong back then". Fools expect 100% correct calls all the time. But nobody is perfect, nobody knows all the markets' moves beforehand. One is at best ~70% of the time correct. Instead of using that 70% to their advantage, they keep hammering on the 30% and therefore never get anywhere themselves. Aka losers.
1) Wrong! My last update on the NDX was from March 28, which is 5 weeks ago! (if you can't even count weeks, why should anybody even below one single word you uttered) where I clearly stated that "As Long As 14,100 Holds, Melt-Up Continues". It did not hold and as I stated in that update "It will take a daily close below NDX 14,100 from current levels, i.e., without reaching $15,000+ first, to suggest this will not happen. But that is my alternate scenario." I've since moved on, but you're still stuck and only can come up with the same old.
2) How about; "awesome you nailed all the important highs and lows weeks in advance. That's pretty good..." Instead, all we get is the usual pissing on other people's work using outdated, incorrect read and misunderstood references.
You forgot to mention the last sentence of that update "All in all, as long as the Feb. 24 low holds, which I think with high certainty it will, the index is in the initial stages of the multi-month rally to NDX 18000." The low didn't hold, thus I am already looking at totally different numbers. You are so far behind the curve, while my premium members are so far ahead of you, it is not funny anymore.
Well, I am the first to admit mistake. The negative reaction AH (-23%) means NFLX is most likely dealing with a continued subdividing 5th of wave-A lower. Indeed as I wrote, "In bear markets, downside surprises and upside disappoints.” That certainly was a surprise, as there were technically enough waves in place to consider wave-A complete. Back to the drawing board... Oh well...