Thank you. But, I might stop posting here. Besides, it is time for you and all others to step it up and do your part. I have no sympathy for silence when obvious abuse is going on. Doing nothing about it makes you condone it. The mere fact I have to write all this here is a sign of a very sad state of affairs at https://www.investing.com/
Hi Edith, Thank you. You are brave, a character trait few have these days. We need more like you. Indeed, https://investing.com needs to step it up. They must provide a safe space for their contributors/authors -who they invite!- and other participants, like you. They do not. I may, therefore, have to sue them for defamation. I am taking it -obviously- very seriously. You can also follow me at https://www.fxempire.com/author/drarnoutterschure. There are no comments allowed there. And I post the same there. Hi Edith, Thank you. You are brave, a character trait few have these days. We need more like you. Indeed, https://investing.com needs to step it up. They must provide a safe space for their contributors/authors -who they invite!- and other participants, like you. They do not. I may, therefore, have to sue them for defamation. I am taking it -obviously- very seriously. You can also follow me at https://www.fxempire.com/author/drarnoutterschure. There are no comments allowed there. And I post the same there.
Moreover, this also goes to all the normal, good people out there. Who enjoy my work but remain silent in the background. If you do not do anything, if you do not report these remarks, if you do not push back and respond to those individuals who are out of line, then we have "evil will prevail when good men do nothing." and I will decide to stop posting my work in a hateful environment. Nobody deserves to be treated this way. So, kudos to you Edith for stepping up. Now it is time for the others to support you and push back on the Mike's, Mat's, Bill's etc. of this world. Enough is enough.
Thank you, Edith. Unfortunately, it is always the same few characters spewing their hatred (Mike Sim, Beckham, R D, and a few others). If you check their profiles and read what they constantly comment on everywhere it is rather shocking. They are sad individuals, in a sad state of mind. It does not matter what you say, what you do, it will never be good or right in their eyes. However, investing.com is not policing its comments sections. Those personally insulting comments, name-calling, defamatory, negative non-constructive remarks. are indeed not allowed, but nothing is done about it. Self-reporting is obviously not sufficient. If one provides an option for comments, one must also actively manage those comments. Like every other social media platform does.
Really? In my last update about the NASDAQ100 from September 2nd, when the index was trading at 12220s, I said "Once wave-iv completes, wave-v should ideally target about 11400-11600. It bottomed at 11928. But they, keep living the old narrative. Really? In my last update about the NASDAQ100 from September 2nd, when the index was trading at 12220s, I said "Once wave-iv completes, wave-v should ideally target about 11400-11600. It bottomed at 11928. But they, keep living the old narrative.
Thank you! Please know, I don't present anything accurately in time. I simply work with the space available to keep the charts still relevant, understandable, and legible.
LMAO. Dude, In June I already postulated the markets were in a Bear market... Since then the only Bullish call I have made was for a rally of the June lows that based on technical patterns could target ~15,000. It stalled at 13750. So what? I cautioned folks in mid-August that a bullish setup was still not proven, a viola.
LMAO. Dude that was in March. Keep living in the past. You never make a mistake I assume? You keep reminding everyone forever 'cause of a mistake they made a long time ago? What a tragic life you have. In June I already postulated the markets were in a Bear market... Since then the only Bullish call I have made was for a rally of the June lows that based on technical patterns could target ~15,000. It stalled at 13750. So what? I cautioned folks in mid-August that a bullish setup was still not proven, a voila.
no, I was not. ONLY if certain price levels were broken to the upside AND price levels to the downside held. They did not. AND tsla has nothing to do with this, btw tesla is very close to confirming my five waves up. yup, i was right again!
What part of “Thus, the objective EWP-based path I shared almost a month ago has filled in rather well, with only a few nuances: (green) W-5 topped ($315 vs. ~$330), and (red) W-iv has likely bottomed ($266 vs. ~$290), with (red) W-v of (black) W-1 now most likely underway.” was wrong? Please tell me! Next, i am very sorry if i cannot know exactly where price will top and bottom weeks beforehand. Nobody can. I so don’t understand why people expext 100% perfection in an imperfect word. If you can do better than start writing these updates yourself. If you cannot then shut up and listen. Simple.
Yes, because those are the two options the market has. Markets are all about the probability of possibilities. Once you wrap your head around that you’ll truly understand the financial markets.
My forecasts are never based on timing. Only price. I never mention timing in my articles either… I am merely working with the space available to kee things legible and provide context.
Weird, almost a year ago the stock topped exactly where i said it would and then fell to within $120 of where I also said it would. And you say I should go back to school. Seems like you are the one who cannot read nor comprehend so I think you shouls go back to school.
As usual when people say “all you say is it can go up or down” is in part because of confusing the short-term variability and lower odds with the clear intermediate-term direction. In this case higher. It is simply short-term a matter of how that will resolve: more variability. Intermediate term remains pointing higher!