Seadrill Partners LLC (SDLPQ)

OTC Markets
0.11
0.00(0.00%)
  • Volume:
    0
  • Bid/Ask:
    0.00/0.00
  • Day's Range:
    0.06 - 0.14

SDLPQ Comments

What is your sentiment on Seadrill Partners LLC?
or
Market is currently closed. Voting is open during market hours.

All Comments

(17)
  • After six months that the stock is under $ 1 value, shouldn't this company be off the stock exchange?
    0
    • whats up guys???
      0
      • Can somebody explain what's happening with that company???
        2
        • Sometimes I feel like contacting these companies, and giving suggestions (like We did with JMU, LVS, RAD etc.,). And since we own the stocks, they should know our intentions. AMAZING OPPORTUNITY FOR THIS COMPANY TO EXPAND 40X..T: @arhqadri
          0
          • I know nothing about this company just what I've read online I bought a 100 shares. what should I expect.
            1
            • Depends on what you're looking for, and what your goals are. I mean, this is a speculative play, and the upside is just too great to ignore. 10% of my portfolio consists of these speculative stocks. They've assets, positive balance sheet, CEO pushing few pipeline products; and so on..
              0
            • What are your goals?
              1
          • I know nothing about this company just what I've read online I bought a 100 shares. what should I expect.
            1
            • They've great revenue, a very vast sales contracts, BUT THE MANAGEMENT!!!!!
              0
              • Perfect timing to announce dividend cut, DOW is dropping, oil is dropping and IMF sees global slow down. SDLP burn me once, shame on you, burn me twice shame on me. What is next? Chapter 11 again, board of the directors should be all fired.
                0
                • Dear Fed, ECB and BOJ, please have a look at this stock SDLP - some QE here would be much apreciated to "help this sluggishness". Thank you.
                  1
                  • Will enter 3.50s
                    0
                    • In my last comment, I meant earnings per share for 2.8  for 2015 and 3.06 for 2016.
                      0
                      • Can somebody explain me why in the annual reports of seadrill is reported an annual loss per share of 1.49 in 2015 and 0.36 in 2016. But here we have Earnings of 0.62 and 0.13 per share in those years? I´m sorry if I am missing something, I'm just learning to read te finiancial statements.
                        0
                        • Your figures seem wrong...
                          0
                        • Diluted EPS 2016 3.06 2015 2.8
                          0
                      • Taking profit!
                        0
                        • Sdlp is ready to buy
                          0
                          • Still a great bargain though
                            0
                            • Still not ready to go in heavy yet
                              0
                              • This is a 10+ stock that has been shorted it should be in line ith RigP
                                0
                                Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All derived (stocks, indexes, futures), cryptocurrencies, and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn't bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.
                                Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.