Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Which Healthcare Mutual Fund Should You Buy: PHLAX or FSMEX?

Published 10/02/2020, 06:58 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

Investors often rely on the healthcare sector to safeguard their investments. This is because demand for healthcare services does not vary much with market conditions. Also, investments in the sector provide sufficient protection to the capital invested.

Many pharmaceutical companies also offer regular dividends. Companies that consistently pay out dividends are financially stable and generate consistent cash flows, irrespective of market conditions. Mutual funds are perfect choices for investors looking to enter this sector since they possess the advantages of wide diversification and analytical insight.

As a matter of fact, the U.S. healthcare sector is anticipated to experience a major revolution in the days to come. The coronavirus pandemic is likely to shape up the future for the space.

In such circumstances, investing in healthcare mutual funds seems prudent. However, choosing the right mutual funds for your portfolio can be quite tricky. To that end, let us find out which of the two funds discussed below is better.

PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund- Class A PHLAX

The fund aims for long-term capital appreciation. This non-diversified fund invests majority of its assets in equity and equity-related securities of companies within the health sciences sector, such as pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, medical device manufacturers, healthcare service providers and health maintenance organizations.

Further, the fund also invests in other companies that derive at least half of their revenues or profits from operations in the healthcare sector.

This Sector-Health product has a history of positive total returns for over 10 years. Specifically, the fund’s returns over the three and five-year benchmarks are 11.5% and 7.1%, respectively. To see how this fund performed compared in its category, and other #1 and #2 Ranked Mutual Funds, please click here.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund- Class A, as of the last filing, allocates its assets in the top two major groups — Large Growth and Foreign Bond. Further, as of the last filing, Sarepta Therapeutics (NASDAQ:SRPT) Inc, Unitedhealth Group Inc. and Biomarin Pharmaceutical were the top holdings for PHLAX.

This product, with a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), was incepted in June 1999 and is managed by PGIM. PHLAX carries an expense ratio of 1.15% and requires a minimal initial investment of $1,000.

Fidelity Select Medical (NYSE:SEM) Technology and Devices Portfolio FSMEX

This fund aims for capital growth. It invests majority of its assets in companies that are engaged in activities such as research, manufacturing, supply and sale of medical equipment and related technologies. The fund also invests in companies providing information technology services to health care providers. The non-diversified fund invests in common stocks and in U.S. and non-U.S. issuers.

This Sector-Health product has a history of positive total returns for over 10 years. Specifically, the fund’s returns are 20.9% over the three-year and 19.9% of the five-year period. To see how this fund performed compared in its category, and other #1 and #2 Ranked Mutual Funds, please click here.

The Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio fund, as of the last filing, allocates its assets in top two major groups — Large Growth and High Yield Bond. Further, as of the last filing, Thermo Fisher Scientific (NYSE:TMO), Becton Dickinson (NYSE:BDX) & Company and Boston Scientific Corp (NYSE:BSX) were the top holdings for FSMEX.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

This product with a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2 (Buy) was incepted in April 1998 and is managed by Fidelity. FSMEX carries an expense ratio of 0.71% and requires a minimal initial investment of $0.

To Conclude

While both FSMEX and PHLAX are recommended buys, upon having a closer look, we find that the former is a clear winner. PHLAX is way more expensive compared to FSMEX (it has a minimum initial investment $1,000 compared to FSMEX’s $0). Further, its administrative and other operating expenses are higher than FSMEX. So, one should clearly bet on FSMEX for higher returns on low investments.

Want key mutual fund info delivered straight to your inbox?

Zacks’ free Fund Newsletter will brief you on top news and analysis, as well as top-performing mutual funds, each week. Get it free >>


Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report

Get Your Free (FSMEX): Fund Analysis Report

Get Your Free (PHLAX): Fund Analysis Report

To read this article on Zacks.com click here.

Zacks Investment Research

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.