Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

US To Squeeze China Through Pakistan

By Marc ChandlerMarket OverviewAug 01, 2018 12:43PM ET
US To Squeeze China Through Pakistan
By Marc Chandler   |  Aug 01, 2018 12:43PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items

The US often struggles to convert its economic power into political outcomes, though President Trump has ramped up efforts to do precisely that. In the fight against terrorism, the US Treasury has greatly expanded its efforts to cut off financing and through the experience and the Great Financial Crisis, access to the US dollar market, including for funding, is not simply a utility but a privilege that the US could deny its adversaries.

There are other ways in which the US can use its financial acumen to impose its will. Here is a drama that is unfolding, though it has not percolated into the public's consciousness yet. It begins in Pakistan, which has been party to at least 13 IMF programs since 1980. Although it has not formally asked for another one, macro considerations suggest it is likely. Many expect Pakistan's likely new Prime Minister, Imran Khan, to seek one shortly after assuming office. His party is about 22 seats shy of a parliamentary majority, after running a campaign against the two main ruling families. The US is threatening to veto it, which would make it hard for Pakistan to service its debt. Its debt is primarily owed to the IMF, World Bank and China.

Pakistan is caught between a rock and a hard place. Given the number of times it availed itself of IMF assistance, it will be reluctant to stiff the multilateral lenders. It also wants to avoid having a debt problem with China, which has shown itself to be a harsh taskmaster. Loans from China are often not on concessionary terms and involve collateral. Recently, for example, Sri Lanka had to transfer ownership of Hambantota port to China (for 99 years, shades of Hong Kong).

China's loans to Pakistan are part of a $60 bln infrastructure development project dubbed China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which is part of China's Belt-Road Initiative (BRI) It borrowed an estimated 20% or $12 bln from Chinese commercial banks. Meanwhile, Pakistans exports are falling and combined with rising oil prices, is leading to deterioration of its current account and a draining of its official reserves. As of two weeks ago, Pakistan's reserves were reported at about $9 bln. This is less than two months of import coverage. The rupee has lost about 11.5% against the dollar this year after depreciating by 5.5% in 2017.

Reports suggest that Pakistan may need a few billion dollars to carry it through the next few months. The last IMF assistance was in 2013 for $5.3 bln. There have been some reports claiming that the country will seek as much as a $12 bln credit line. The IMF would likely demand concessions and it could force the new government to backtrack from its campaign promises to boost social spending for education, healthcare and the social safety net. The IMF projects the fiscal deficit could reach 7% this year compared with a 4.1% target.

China's liberal lending practices offer an alternative to the conditionality the multilateral lenders demand. US policymakers chaff under the Chinese efforts, which saddle countries with more debt and little incentive to reform. US policymakers recognize that China is using its loans to influence other countries. These projects often put US businesses at a commercial disadvantage.

Pakistan is not unique in its struggle to repay its debt to China. A recent study by the RWR Advisory Group found that almost a third of the value of the loans related to China's Belt-Road initiative since 2013, or nearly $420 bln, are in trouble due to persistent project delays, public opposition and national security issues. Malaysia's new government has suspended new Chinese-backed infrastructure projects and is reviewing existing projects. Cambodia's surge of capital equipment imports related to China's infrastructure projects is causing economic problems beginning with the trade deficit swelling to 10% of GDP.

Pakistan does not have many alternatives. In 1998, amid another debt crisis, Saudi Arabia agreed to defer oil payments. The Saudi's financial position has changed and it may be less willing to delay payments again, which is a short-term fix in any event. The IMF expressed concerns about the implication of the CPEC investments on Pakistan's balance of payments a few months ago. However, the multilateral lender took exception to the US claim that emphasized CPEC loans with Pakistan's current straits. The IMF is engaged with Pakistan via the Post-Program Monitoring and regular Article IV consultations.

As of now, there is no formal request from Pakistan. The US has made its opposition known. A veto remains an implicit threat. However, there can be no mistake, the US is looking for ways it can block the expansion of China's influence. US policymakers and investors seem to be of two minds. On the one hand, they see a slowing economy, large debt and an ossified political system, which is often seen as contradicting the modernizing economy. On the other hand, China is seen as pushing to supplant the US and the dollar. Since the 2016 US election, China has been defending the status quo, multilateral institutions and trade. Chinese officials seem to believe that under the current rules, it can win. The US is the one seeking to change the rules of engagement.

Original Post

US To Squeeze China Through Pakistan

Related Articles

James Picerno
S&P 500 Risk Profile By James Picerno - Jan 21, 2022

The US stock market is knee-deep in another one of its periodic bouts of selling. Is this the big one or just another short-term correction? The only honest answer, as always:...

Paul Rejczak
S&P 500: Should We Buy the Dip? By Paul Rejczak - Jan 21, 2022

The S&P 500 broke below its early December low. Are we in a new bear market or is this still just a downward correction? The broad stock market index lost 1.10% on Thursday...

US To Squeeze China Through Pakistan

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (2)
Ahmad muaz
Ahmad muaz Sep 10, 2020 4:24AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
nice analysis but I think PM IK has the ability to counter the economic issues
Farooq Malik
Farooq Malik Jul 22, 2019 8:00AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email