Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

U.S. November Payrolls: Has Job Growth Peaked?

Published 12/07/2018, 12:42 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

Hiring growth slowed in November among US companies, according to this morning’s update of the ADP Employment Report. Payrolls increased 179,000 last month, down from 225,000 in October. As expected, the annual pace of growth also ticked lower — just barely — although rounding the year-over-year change to one digit leaves the year-over-year trend at a healthy 2.0% for a second month – the fastest rise in over two years.

“Job growth is strong, but has likely peaked,” says Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics, which co-produces the numbers with ADP (NASDAQ:ADP).

“This month’s report is free of significant weather effects and suggests slowing underlying job creation. With very tight labor markets, and record unfilled positions, businesses will have an increasingly tough time adding to payrolls.”

A fractionally softer year-over-year trend in private payrolls is expected in today’s estimate from the Labor Department (echoing the outlook for US GDP growth). The Capital Spectator’s point forecast for the one-year change in the government’s payrolls report for November (scheduled for release on Friday, Dec. 7) is 1.9%, down slightly from October’s 2.0% rise – a gain that matches September’s annual increase. The back-to-back advances in the last two updates mark the strongest year-over-year gains in two years, but that trend appears set to wilt, albeit fractionally in November.

Although the projected downshift in the annual trend for payrolls is expected to be measured, Zandi’s observation that employment growth has peaked appears set for confirmation in the published figures in the December update and beyond.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Labor Dept. Private Sector Payrolls 1 Year

The projections are based on averaging forecasts from eight models, each using a different methodology and offer a different set of pros and cons. Numerous studies over the years advise that combining forecasts from different models generally improves the accuracy of the estimates relative to the projections from any one model. (For an example of the literature on the topic, see this summary.) Here’s a summary of the eight models used to generate the forecasts above. Seven of the models use univariate methods – analyzing the indicator under scrutiny in isolation – while the eighth model draws on multiple indicators. All the analytics are generated in R.

Exponential smoothing state space model: the average forecast is used from 100 simulations based on bootstrap aggregating via the forecasting package. The data set is the historical record for the target indicator.

Autoregressive integrated moving average model: the average forecast is used from 100 simulations based on bootstrap aggregating via the forecasting package. The data set is the historical record for the target indicator.

Neural network model: the average forecast is used from 100 simulations via the forecasting package. The data set is the historical record for the target indicator.

Naïve model: this forecast simply extracts the last data point and assumes that it will prevail for the next 12 months.

Cubic Spline model: a local linear forecasts using cubic smoothing splines via the forecasting package. The data set is the historical record for the target indicator.

Facebook’s Prophet forecasting tool. The data set is the historical record for the target indicator.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Theta method forecast model: the methodology is a simple exponential smoothing with drift via the forecasting package.

Vector autoregression model: this multivariate methodology (via the vars package) uses the following datasets:

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.