Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

The Week Ahead: Volatility Ahead Of Central Banks, Trend Crossroads

Published 09/04/2022, 10:27 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM
  • Investors to continue rotating out of growth into defensive, dividend players.
  • Short-term uptrend held after price confirmed long-term downtrend.
  • Energy to fall, as recession outweighs war.
  • How to determine whether my S&P 500 prediction is correct

This week could prove to be a technical catalyst between the short-term and the long-term trends as global central banks are slated to increase interest rates amid persistently high |inflation.

With September historically the second-worst month of the year, investors are likely to resume a rotation from growth to defensives, energy, and dividend stocks.

Energy was the only S&P 500 Index sector in the green, rising 1.83% on Friday.

Utilities was the clear relative winner for the week, retreating only 1.47%. Healthcare followed with a 1.81% decline. On the other end of the spectrum, technology plunged by over 5%.

On a monthly scale, only energy and utilities were up, 4.36% and 0.97%, respectively. Technology lost 7% during that time.

Utilities outperformed in the past three months, losing just 0.15%. Communication services lost 11.65%. However, materials underperformed with a 15.05% plummet as economic growth slowed.

Also, on a six-month basis, only energy and utilities were green, roughly 9.5%. Underperforming, once again, was communication services - down 21.02% - and technology, which slumped 13.88%.

Again, the same sectors were the only two S&P 500 sectors that were positive for the year, with energy catapulting 44.07% and utilities gaining 4.22%.

Finally, on a 12-month basis, energy surged 63.52%. Utilities climbed 6.46%, putting the same two industries alone in green territory. Conversely, communication services was gutted with a 30.7% loss, followed by technology's 23.6% drop. At the same time, communication services lost 37% and technology 16.3%, coming in as the two worst performers.

Energy has been outperforming only due to the Russia-Ukraine war. However, the sector closed on Friday less than 0.5% from its lowest level since Jan. 27, on prospects of a slowdown. I have given a repeated bearish call. In this post WTI was trading above $95. According to my analysis, oil is en route to keep falling below $60.

So, energy's outperformance thus far does not represent economic health, in my opinion. Instead, its continued decline does. Conversely, the rotation into defensive and dividend payers out of growth stocks is a vote of no confidence in economic growth.

We get confirmation from the global bond market, which fell into a bear market last week for the first time in a generation. Bonds suffered their "worst year in history" due to an extreme transition from the lost decade of little to no inflation to the highest in four decades.

I have been bearish throughout this entire rally since the mid-June bottom. I wrote a few weekly posts in which I said that I don't know whether stocks will necessarily fall this week, but that I expected them to. When they finally did top out Aug. 16, having lost nearly 10% since then, some readers commented that, of course, at some point markets will fall. They said I was a "permabear," irrationally pessimistic. As far as they're concerned, if stocks didn't fall on the day or week I said I expected them to, I was wrong.

But assets don't move in straight lines. When I make a call, I am not saying that the asset will go in my direction from that moment. I clarify that the asset may move the other way first. So, how to know if my call is successful or not? There must be a gauge. Those are peaks and troughs.

S&P 500 Daily Chart

Source: Investing.com

Here you can see the short-term uptrend versus the long-term downtrend. My call is intact if the short term doesn't reverse the long term with higher peaks and troughs. However, for me to be correct, the price has to register a new low below June's bottom. Until then, I will not claim that my bearish call was right just because it fell. Note how the S&P 500 found support precisely at the short-term rising channel. That means it's still in play. While a lower price will technically (in English, not technical analysis) prove me right, I will consider my call a failure. I will take pride in my estimation if the price creates a leg lower, proportionate to the previous troughs.

The price fell about 700 points, or 14.6%, between the Jan. 4 record peak and the Feb 23 low. Then, it fell another 1,000 points or 21.6% between the March 28 peak and the June 17 low. That's the kind of decline I'm looking for. The price has so far dropped 419 points, or 9.7%, from its Aug. 16 high. If it at least registers a new low, it will fall at least 688 points or almost 16%. On Aug. 25, I forecast that the S&P 500 would fall toward 3,000. If it reaches that area, I will consider my call successful.

Meanwhile, the major averages fell for three straight weeks for the first time since the bottom. The Nasdaq, representing growth stocks, fell for six days in a row.

America created 315,000 jobs in August, threatening further inflation and egging on the Federal Reserve with more aggressive tightening, which is the theme that has been causing stocks to fall and bond yields to rise. Conversely, unemployment rose to 3.7% from 3.5%. It's the highest rate since 2020, tying with the lowest since 1969. However, unemployment didn't rise because more people lost their jobs but because they started looking for work again. Employers have been starving for a labor force, and this added supply benefits the economy. However, if the new jobs won't help the economy grow, it will be another sign of an economic downturn.

The U.S. dollar initially dropped on Friday because the Fed would have options and not be forced to keep raising rates as quickly. Average hourly wages began to fall, a sign of easing inflation. However, the dollar bounced and closed at the highest level in 20 years, since June 19, 2002. The dollar hit my target and then some, and I expect it to go higher yet.

Dollar Index Daily Chart

Source: Investing.com

The dollar completed a falling flag, with the implied target of 4.62 from the 108.70 breakouts to about 112.03.

Gold jumped on Friday upon the August jobs report, despite the dollar's perseverance.

Gold Futures Daily Chart

Source: Investing.com

Gold opened lower but erased Thursday's losses, forming a bullish piercing pattern that is almost an engulfing pattern.

The two-day favorable reversal structure developed above the July lows, giving it more strength. The $1,700 price area has been longstanding support since April 2020. Nevertheless, the commodity is still in a downtrend since the March 8 peak.

Bitcoin dropped for the third straight day, the fourth week in a row, and the second month. On Friday, excited traders bid up BTC above $20,000 after the employment data, but they couldn't maintain gains.

Bitcoin Daily Chart

Source: Investing.com

The digital currency leader trades within a pennant in the second consecutive continuation pattern. When the pennant completes, with a downside breakout, it will imply a $17,392 target within my overall, long-term bearish call.

Oil may have completed a rising flag, implying an $81.50 target. Note that Friday's trading developed an inverted hammer. A close above Friday's opening price will suggest a return move to retest the flag's integrity before heading lower.

Crude Oil WTI Futures Daily Chart

Source: Investing.com

Disclaimer: The author currently does not own any of the securities mentioned in this article.

***

Looking to get up to speed on your next idea? With InvestingPro+ you can find

  • Any company’s financials for the last 10 years
  • Financial health scores for profitability, growth, and more
  • A fair value calculated from dozens of financial models
  • Quick comparison to the company’s peers
  • Fundamental and performance charts

And a lot more. Get all the key data fast so you can make an informed decision, with InvestingPro+. Learn More »

Latest comments

The premise underlying the Fed's balance sheet is the BELIEF that the emperor is fully clothed whereas the emperor is completely naked. All of this is based on the assumption that the dollar (aka FRNs) is a QUANTIFIABLE, intelligible, knowable (as to what its value is) entity. That's the false assumption underlying our economy. The dollar is presently UNDEFINED = unknowable. No contract can be drawn based on an unknown so all contracts extant are null and void except in a world that exist perpetually in 1984. Furthermore, FRNs are unlawful and a treasonous CRIME according to Article 1, Section 10 of the US Constitution. Putin, the Mollahs, and Biden and Congress are all partners in crime for they all deal in dollars. Money cannot consist of a crime. By pretending to be analyzing what doesn't even exist, we are basically tacitly implying that it actually exists. Just like merely saying the naked emperor is wearing clothes, doesn't make it so. Stocks are the naked dollar's clothes.
Thanks. Great analysis. It looks like we’re in for a good trading month.
Thank you, William. These are interesting times. Happy trading!
Thank you for the great analysis, as always! Could you please write an article about the traders psychology behind technical trends?
Hi Amie, thanks. Sorry, my column's format does not allow that, at the moment.
Thank you for the reply, I understand.
The best analysis out there
Great analysis, I always look forward to read you! not permabear, it's just reasonable TA + Macro expectations, higher odds to happen than prices rising without any apparent reason
Thank you, Ariel, but I'm always concerned about the economy being out of whack in the aftermath of more than a decade of QE, which means anything can happen.
BTC heading to 17000 dollars is very much possible
Anything is possible.
its not permabear to be bearish from March as the writing is on the wall. hikes and more hikes, an economy falling (globally too), inflation inflation.   once Fed says they are hiking and switching to QT at $90B per month, one should realize quickly that its not 2021 anymore.
Permabulls had a lot of justifications for this rally, which they took for granted to be a bottom.
We could see a gap down opening today? Looks like a critical week, great reading
I have no idea.
👍
Excellent article, Pinchas.
Thanks, Khazad-dûm!
"The only reason Energy has moved higher is due to the War"? Energy's upward price action was in race months b4 the Russian invasion. Under investment in Energy through misguided policies has left the entire World in a perilous position. Under investment and supply challenges dictate price direction. That said, your article from a technical analysis is informative.
Doug, the only reason *at present* in the context of a recession.
Have effectively traded and shared your market sentiment however I don't see oil to 60. I believe OPEC will cut as necessary to maintain over 65 to 70. At some point China will have to give up on its massive lock down failures which will give oil a boost.
Thank you for your feedback Carey. I provided the technical pattern's implied target, is all. I otherwise have no clue what the price will be. I can't tell the future, unfortunately (or fortunately. I could turn dark).
something similar to melware. plz 🙏 make sure I free from them team misleading. zero debt received until now.
since I started last year's,, in Malaysia, personally I think, in preparation of growth in virtually are not too good , due to to many of are miskeading,, I m really disappointed with service provider,, intergertion .
What u see for gold can u specify
I don't see. I'm not a seer. I analyze. I'm an analyst. Exactly as I said. I provided the support but warned that gold is still in a downturn. So, you can go long if you're willing to accept the higher risk proportionate to the higher gains of catching a corrective rally.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.