
Please try another search
In settling out the week yesterday (Friday) at 1650, gold recorded its lowest weekly close of the past four. And within the guise of the ongoing weekly parabolic short trend (as we below see), let's recall what herein was penned four weeks ago upon it all starting back then:
■ "...[this] case nonetheless suggests Gold dropping to around 1599-1585..."
That's just some 50 points further down from here, which given that Gold's EWTR ("Expect Weekly Trading Range") is now 58 points means the sub-1600s can be reasonably reached with in a week or two. And no, we're not Short Gold. Rather we follow our own advice that "Shorting Gold is a bad idea", something the purported paper price suppressors shall likely one day learn the hard way. But until Gold is again (per its historical wont) taken seriously, hardly is the current trend our friend:
To be sure therein, the faster daily parabolics for Gold -- as well as those for Silver -- had flipped to Long, sending the yellow metal to as high as 1739 and the white metal to as high as 21.31; however, both those parabolic studies have just now flipped back to Short, down from those two highs per yesterday's settles by -5.1% and -14.6% respectively. Indeed, Silver's drop being nearly triple that by Gold, the Gold/Silver ratio has leapt back over 90x to 90.7x as stated at the foot of above graphic.
Such negativity noted, the website's Market Magnets for the precious metals are indicative of their recent selling being excessive. Here on the left for Gold we've the past three months of daily closes (thin line) along with the Magnet (thick line); the oscillator at the foot of the graphic is the distance of price from the Magnet, now notably extreme per prior troughs. Then on the right is the same analysis for Silver, her deviation also comparatively extreme:
Regardless of such colliding technicals (the parabolic Short trend vs. overdone selling per the Magnet), the Gold Story remains pretty much the same: lack of ownership interest (recall the below-average, declining volume table from two missives ago) plus the purported paper price suppression continue to keep the precious metals under wraps.
Meanwhile from the "Money is Coming Out of Everything Dept." we've the stock market and its attendant hysteria. As we've oft put forth over these many years, change is an illusion whereas price is the truth. And last Thursday's 194-point whipsaw in the S&P 500 had quite the illusionary effect on the FinMedia. As Bloomy couched it, Thursday's move was "historic". Really? So we checked: the S&P 500's percentage range between that day's low and high was 5.6%; since 1980, such range ranks 59th (hardly "historic") across those 10,812 trading days. But for the Bulls, it did sate them for some 24 hours before better than half of Thursday's gain was given back yesterday. Bear markets can be brutal.
For the S&P, regular readers well know the technical support structure runs from here at 3600 down to 3200. Therein, Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) earlier in this bear market suggested a target of 3400. Now this past week, JPM's Jamie "Jumpin'" Dimon sees 2900 as feasible due to (deep breath) "valuation", something upon which we've been harping for years! 'Course the difference today is that interest rates are positive.
But wait, there's more: You might recall this from mid-May when the S&P was over 4000: "...we see no sense fundamentally to be in the stock market..." --[deMeadville Prescient Commentary, Tue, 17 May].
From which we segue to having just updated this:
And what "this means" is that should there be no year-over-year S&P earnings growth, price at the mean is 2522, (just in case you're scoring at home). Now obviously 'tis too earlier in this fresh Q3 Earnings Season to make any reasonable judgment; however, for the 19 S&P 500 constituents having thus far reported, 11 (58%) have bettered their earnings. Yet, is the long-awaited "Look Ma! No Earnings!" crash finally underway?
Here, too, is the S&P 500's regression channel as set from January 1973 through February 2020 (i.e. to COVID), and then extended through today. In other words: where might the S&P be had COVID not come to be? Remember: the increase in the U.S. Money Supply ("M2") on account of COVID essentially equaled the post-COVID increase in the market capitalization of the S&P. In other words: the money never ought have been printed. And now look where re-entry into the channel would be: 2900. You cannot make this stuff up:
However speaking of "up" is the rightmost track of the Economic Barometer incorporating Q3 metrics, in turn maintaining the notion that we'll see a return to growth "inflated as it may be" for StateSide Q3 Gross Domestic Product, (as we've previously noted in perfect timing for the mid-term elections):
For the week just past, of the 11 incoming Baro metrics, nine were net positive (vis-à-vis expectations, improvements and revisions), of which six were direct period-over-period improvements. And as we've pointed out over the years, inflation tends to work as an Econ Baro positive as it reflects demand for goods and services: ya just gotta pay more for 'em. This even as Chicago FedPrez Charles "Ever Upwards" Evans says the Federal Reserve need keep raising rates. But from a more daunting perspective, FedViceChairWoman Lael "The Brain" Brainard noted that past and future rate hikes shall (in the words of Dow Jones Newswires) "...slow the economy in ways that can’t be observed yet..." Terrifique.
Neither terrific are the precious metals' respective price paths. Here at left we've Gold's daily bars across the past three months-to-date, the baby-blue dots of regression trend consistency running out of puff. And at right we've same for Sister Silver as it swiftly has all gone wrong for her of late:
And when it ain't goin' right, 'tis deep into the Market Profiles one find price's plight, (i.e. at the bottom). Here they are for the past two weeks with Gold (below left) and for Silver (below right); neither is a pretty sight:
Gold futures reached a 9-month high of $1,975; spot gold at nearly $1,960 A weaker-than-expected reading for nonfarm payrolls could help gold reach $2,000 The Dollar Index is at a...
In a piece I wrote on Jan. 28, I warned about growing hopes for retesting $2000 could lead to a fake breakout shortly to trap gold bulls as the retesting of $2000 seemed likely...
Gold Price The precious metals price action is expected to be a wild one today, and this is because the US NFP number is likely to bring higher volatility for the metal. Again, a...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.