Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

The Fed And U.S. Economy: Some Like It Hot But Many Do Not

By Marc ChandlerMarket OverviewJun 27, 2021 01:20AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/the-fed-and-us-economy-some-like-it-hot-but-many-do-not-200588436
The Fed And U.S. Economy: Some Like It Hot But Many Do Not
By Marc Chandler   |  Jun 27, 2021 01:20AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

Three events highlight the week ahead. The quarter-end can often experience heightened intraday volatility as investors and banks adjust positions and hedges. Hours before the end of trading for the quarter, the eurozone's preliminary estimate of June CPI will be published. Then, on July 2, ahead of a three-day holiday weekend in the US, the BLS will report the June employment data, which has disappointed expectations in the last couple of months. 

There are many asymmetries of information around the month-end and quarter-end adjustments. It seems very much the case that while a single order book may not be very revealing, an amalgam of several may not be any more representative. Nevertheless, for some market participants, simply being aware that month-end and quarter-end can produce their own echo effect may be sufficient to adjust one's tactics accordingly.

Asset managers use industry benchmarks and compete not just against the faceless market but against companies that offer a similar service. It appears that adjusting hedges on a monthly basis has become a more widespread practice. In addition, we know from trade-cost analysis that the best time to trade is when every else is, which helps explain the self-reinforcing mechanism that made the London fix so important.

The operational and execution is fascinating in its own right, and short-run discontinuities can and do result. Ultimately, the macro factors influence the flows themselves. There seems to be a dialectic dance between the reaction function of markets and that of central banks that are mediated by positioning. The ECB has taken itself out of the game. It will not review the pace of its asset purchases until September. That reduces the significance of the preliminary June estimate of CPI.

In this dialectic dance, we can take the analysis further. The weakness of the euro and the rise in energy prices, coupled with the frictions from the uneven re-opening, suggest upward pressure on prices. However, last June prices rose by 0.3%. This will drop out of the year-over-year measure, and June's 12-month rate may slip from May's 2.0% pace. However, the next challenge is just around the corner. In July and August last year, CPI fell by 0.4% each month. This means that when the ECB meets on September 9, inflation will likely appear to appear have accelerated again.

Moreover, the economy will appear to be accelerating. After contracting in Q4 20 and Q1 21, the eurozone has begun to expand again here in Q2. Given the increased inoculations and the return to work that can be expected after the summer and the beginning of the disbursement of EU funds (mostly grants), growth will likely broaden and strengthen. That is likely the macroeconomic backdrop at the ECB's September meeting.

A key consideration is what the Fed will be doing when the ECB meets at the end of the summer?  The September FOMC meeting is not until September 22, well after the ECB's meeting. The ECB must hope, like many market participants, that the Fed's intent is strongly hinted at the Jackson Hole conference in late August, if not before. Since earlier this year, surveys have shown a firm expectation for this timeframe for the tapering announcement.

There is good reason to expect the tapering this time to be different from after the Great Financial Crisis. One way it could be different is that there seems to be some broad concern about the Fed's MBS purchases. The initial stages of the tapering could focus on this sector. Another way the tapering could be different than before is that the pace may be quicker. It is noteworthy that the ECB emergency bond-buying program (PEPP) is presently supposed to run through March 2022. Could it end before the Fed has completed its tapering?  

The employment data will inform the Fed's discussion. The early forecasts are centered around a 700k increase in nonfarm payrolls. Without considering potential revisions, job growth needs to be a bit better than that for the Q2 average to exceed the Q1 average (518k). However, the government jobs have flattered the results. Consider that the private sector would need to add more jobs this month than it did in April and May combined (711k) to surpass the Q1 average (489k). Although GDP is back to where it was on the eve of the pandemic, it has done so without about 6.5 mln private sector employees.

Last September, the Federal Reserve announced it would target the average rate of inflation (headline PCE deflator) at 2% rather than just a constant point target. An overshoot will be tolerated after an undershoot. Leaving aside the period of time that should be considered, for which the Fed has refused to be pinned down, this formalizes what Yellen had tried to do less formally and is encountering similar opposition.

At a Fed conference in Boston a little less than a month before the 2016 election, Federal Reserve Chair Yellen waxed eloquently about the benefits of letting the economy run hot for some time. It would entail letting the unemployment rate fall further and spur more consumption and investment. It would spur innovation and new business formation. Still, Yellen recognized that  “we, of course, need to bear in mind that an accommodative monetary stance, if maintained too long, could have costs that exceed the benefits by increasing the risk of financial instability or undermining price stability.”

The average inflation target could give teeth to Yellen's five-year-old idea, which itself was a refinement in some ways of Greenspan's experiment in letting the economy run stronger due to unrecognized productivity gains without causing price pressures. From 1996 through 1999, Greenspan led the Fed to postpone raising rates as early in the cycle as they have in the past, and then, when rising inflation expectations forced his hand, the pace of tightening was slow.

The new formal inflation target framework is not even a year old. Just as the worst of the last year's deflation drops out of the 12-month comparison and exaggerates the year-over-year rate, several Fed officials push back. Seven of the eighteen Fed officials think a rate hike next year will be appropriate. At this year's average pace of private-sector job growth, it will take until the end of Q3 22 before the net loss of 6.5 mln jobs private sector jobs are recouped. Making some modest assumptions, by the time the Fed meets in September, the four-week moving average of weekly initial jobless claims may approach the pre-pandemic levels. The participation rate is a different matter. It averaged about 63.2% in Q4 19. It was pretty flat, around 61.5% for the past year.

Moreover,  the seeming loss of patience is taking place near what many economists see as a peak in the pace of growth. By the second half of next year, above 3% annualized quarterly growth likely will be seen only in the rearview mirror. The pent-up demand, fiscal stimulus, and bottlenecks in supply chains will have run their course. The growth and price cycle are not twins, but it is reasonable, as a working hypothesis, to suspect they are not very distant cousins either.

The coming fiscal cliff and excesses spurred by the rapid growth, coupled with the doubling of the price of oil since the early last November before the vaccine was announced, seems to point to the risk of an economic downturn in late 2022 or early 2023. This may not be the baseline view, but it is powerful and dangerous even as a risk scenario. To the extent that the economy impacts voters' preferences, how the Fed manages the post-COVID economy could influence next year's mid-term elections and the general election in 2024. 

The Fed And U.S. Economy: Some Like It Hot But Many Do Not
 

Related Articles

The Fed And U.S. Economy: Some Like It Hot But Many Do Not

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (2)
Chris Poulos
Chris Poulos Jun 27, 2021 5:25PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
so one problem that exacerbated the financial crisis of a decade ago was that many people were caught over-leveraged. with all the free money floating around now, market participants get a bit drunk on how much money theyre making and become like addicts. this is not unlike being actually drunk where poor decisions are often made & consequences of actions are not properly thought out. the same over-leveraged situation will repeat itself again & again until the fed learns a valuable lesson ... because we certainly cant rely on government regulation (or personal sanity) to help keep things in check. at some point were going to be looking at financial crisis 2.0 ... we even have another housing bubble in the making. bottom line  ... dont get drunk, do make smart decisions, dont over-leverage & keep your eyes open for developing storms.
Stephen Fa
Stephen Fa Jun 27, 2021 12:12PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Economic growth would be great if it was fueled by primarily government welfare spending and printing $USD to buy stocks and bonds.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email