Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

The ETF Portfolio Strategist: Benefits Of Equal Weighting Portfolios

Published 07/29/2021, 12:30 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

Equal weighting has its advantages—and disadvantages. Whether you should use this model-free, perfectly unbiased approach to portfolio design is debatable. But in the realm of benchmarking, there’s a strong case to adding it to the mix.

With that in mind, starting today we’ll be monitoring an equal-weighted version of the Global Beta 5 portfolio, hereafter known as Global Beta 5 Equal Weight (G.B5.ew).

Equal weighting is dead simple, but the portfolio you apply it to deserves close attention. Imagine a portfolio with ten assets. Equal weighting is easy: put 10% in each security and periodically rebalance to that weighting scheme.

The trouble begins if the ten assets are biased. To use an extreme example: If nine of the ten assets are bonds and the tenth asset a stock, equal weighting would forever dispense a heavily weighted bond portfolio. Not exactly an unbiased portfolio.

The solution, of course, is to strategically choose a mix of assets that will satisfy the equal-weighting goal. G.B5.ew does so by equal-weighting the standard G.B5 portfolio, which is intentionally targeting the four primary asset classes (ignoring cash and equivalents) on a global basis: stocks, bonds, real estate/REITs and commodities via the following five ETFs:

  • Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares (NYSE:VT)

  • Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund ETF Shares (NASDAQ:BND)

  • Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (NASDAQ:BNDX)

  • WisdomTree Continuous Commodity Index Fund (NYSE:GCC)

  • iShares Global REIT ETF (NYSE:REET)

Yes, there are five funds and only four asset classes. Why the mismatch? Because there are no US-listed ETFs that cover the global fixed-income market under one ticker. The next best thing (or at least one of them) is to combine BND and BNDX to create a global bond portfolio.

With that in mind, G.B5.ew equally weights the five funds as follows: 25% each in VT, GCC and REET, with 12.5% each in BND and BNDX. Voila! An equal-weighted global portfolio that covers the primary asset classes (except cash and equivalents).

So, how has G.B5.ew performed? To be blunt, it’s been a dog in recent history, at least in relative terms against our standard benchmarks, which are weighted closer to something approximating a market-value-weighted portfolio. For details, please see this summary.

Why has equal weighted lagged? Shifting away from stocks into bonds (particularly foreign bonds in US-dollar terms) and commodities hasn’t helped in recent years. Maybe that will change in the years ahead. Wouldn’t be the first time. In fact, it’s worth noting that G.B5.ew is in first place year-to-date for the benchmarks, and by a decent margin. Hmmm.

In any case, tracking G.B5.ew in context with other benchmarks is a no-brainer. Deciding if equal weighting is a timely strategy is a topic for another day.

Meantime, the table and chart below offer a summary of how G.B5.ew stacks up against its counterparts through Wednesday's close (July 28).

Portfolio Strategy Benchmarks
Portfolio Strategy Benchmark Wealth Indexes

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.