Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

The End Is Near, Part 2: Everyone Piles Into Junk Bonds

Published 05/03/2015, 03:25 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

Six years into a recovery, stocks at record levels, high-end real estate in the stratosphere and debt levels soaring in virtually every public and private sector. Time to scale back and protect those gains, right? Wrong, apparently, for a depressingly obvious reason: Huge sections of the investing public can’t afford to move into cash or even into conservative paper like short-term Treasuries.

Pension funds that are required to generate 8% annual returns, insurance companies that only make money if incoming premiums earn at leas 6%, retirees who need to generate cash on their savings in order to eat, mutual funds that are judged on quarterly returns, hedge funds that have underperformed lately and will see a tidal wave of redemptions if they don’t outperform from here on out — all feel compelled to make even more money this year than last. They therefore have no choice but to roll the dice for big immediate gains. And guess what they’re choosing:

Junk bonds take the lead in fixed-income returns

After plunging oil prices sent the U.S. high-yield corporate bond market into a tailspin late last year, the asset class has come back.

High-yield is the best performer in U.S. fixed-income in the year so far, after chalking up positive returns in April to outperform investment-grade and Treasuries.

High-yield debt has returned 3.8% in the year so far, according to the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Index System. That compares with 1.7% for investment grade and 1.3% for Treasuries.

The asset class has also outperformed the broader stock market, with the S&P 500, +0.92% showing total returns of 1.1% in the year so far, according to FactSet data.

“There’s just been a desperate demand for yield because rates are so low,” said Martin Fridson, chief investment officer of wealth management firm Lehmann Livian Fridson Advisors. “Fears of a rate hike have receded and the expectations have been pushed back to 2016, and high yield has benefited.”

In April, the high-yield sector had a positive total return of 1.2%, while investment grade had a negative return of 0.5% and Treasuries a negative return of 0.4%. As of Thursday, high-yield was offering an extra 459 basis point-spread over Treasuries, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Not surprisingly, high-yield issuance has continued at a healthy clip. U.S. issuers have sold $133.8 billion of debt in 176 deals in the year so far, according to Dealogic. That’s up from $126.5 billion in 212 deals in the same period in 2014.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

What’s depressing about this is the repetition. Since the late 1980s, panicked governments have responded to slowdowns by herding their most vulnerable savers into excessively risky assets and then pulling away the football. And every time the same groups fall for it. Supposedly risk-averse capital flows to the least appropriate borrowers, who satisfy the demand by issuing a tidal wave of crappy paper which blows up in short order.

And then the game begins again. Since this process is so obviously purposeful and clearly doesn’t help the individuals who have their nest eggs and pensions depleted by the inevitable busts, the only conclusion is that someone else is getting something out of it. Wonder who that could be?

Latest comments

Beware of high-yield bonds. They're rated junk for a reason. They often have poor management. They have high debt, low revenues, and high interest payments. That's not a winning combination. They often have many lawsuits against them due to their poor management and executives.. . An example is Brand Energy which is based in Georgia. They're owned by Clayton, Dubilier, and Rice. The executives are GE castoffs who are terrible. They get sued all the time. Their bond yields are high. It's poorly managed. Their Houston-Pasadena, Tx area is a symbol of how poorly run it is and the executives there should be removed. I would not want to own the bonds of Brand Energy..
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.