Breaking News
0

Leverage Hits All-Time High

By Lance RobertsStock MarketsApr 04, 2017 06:44AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/technically-speaking:-leverage-hits-an-all-time-high-200181244
Leverage Hits All-Time High
By Lance Roberts   |  Apr 04, 2017 06:44AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

As the first quarter of 2017 closes, April begins the last leg of the market's “seasonally strong” period of the year, which is where the idea of “Sell In May And Go Away” comes from. And, of course, every year, there is always a litany of articles written about why it is such a bad idea, you need to just “buy and hold”, blah…blah…blah.

Yes, there are years where the markets rise during the summer months, but more importantly, it is those years that don’t which cause the most damage. Last year, selling in May, saved investors the emotional trauma of the Brexit plunge in June and the pre-election angst in November.

S&P 500
S&P 500

Importantly, “selling in May” does not necessarily mean “going all to cash,” so can we please stop using extremes to try and prove a point. “Selling In May,” at least in my world, is the process of reducing risk during a period in time when historical returns have tended to be poor. Take a look at the chart below, which shows a $10,000 investment into markets during the“Seasonally Strong” vs. “Seasonally Weak” periods. Did you really miss anything by skipping the summer months?

Returns
Returns

During this past weekend’s 2017 Economic and Investment Summit, Greg Morris, author of “Investing With The Trend” made a salient comment about “Sell In May & Go Away.”

Let’s assume the statistics suggest that 75% of the time ‘Selling In May’ is a profitable strategy. As an investor, those are odds worth banking on.

However, as soon as you try it, the strategy doesn’t work. In fact, it doesn’t work over the following three years. So, as an investor, you quit the strategy because it doesn’t work. Right?

Wrong? You just experienced some of the 25% of the time the strategy doesn’t work and with each year the strategy fails to work, the odds increase of a profitable return in the subsequent year.

The statistics are undeniable. Reducing risk in the summer months has benefited investors more often than not. However, given the the focus of commentators, journalist and Wall Street to create action, the long-term benefit is lost to the short-term headline.

Let me paraphrase Greg’s conclusion:

The two biggest keys to winning the long-term investment game are patience and discipline.

Unfortunately, patience and discipline are extremely rare commodities for individual investors today.

Which brings me to margin debt.

Margin Debt Hits Record, Nothing To Worry About?

Just recently, there was a Twitter flurry of discussion regarding the recent surge in margin debt to an all-time record. As noted by the WSJ:

Rising levels of margin debt are generally considered to be a measure of investor confidence. Investors are more willing to take out debt against investments when shares are rising and they have more value in their portfolios to borrow against.

But a steady chug higher to record levels can indicate that investors are losing sight of market risks and betting that stocks can only go up. Margin debt has a history of peaking right before financial collapses like the ones in 2000 and 2007.

But many suggest that high levels of margin debt, in and of itself, is relatively meaningless.

However, as I will explain, I both agree, and disagree.

First, some context, as shown in the chart below, on a quarterly basis, the market is currently more overbought than at just about any other point in history. The vertical red lines denote the bear markets that occur from these levels. Importantly, note the current conditions HAVE NEVER lasted indefinitely.

Overbought S&P 500
Overbought S&P 500

Besides the markets being more extended, bullish and overvalued than at virtually any other point in history, they are currently more levered as well. The NYSE released its latest margin debt figures for February which shows investors piled on leverage pushing levels to all-time highs.

Debt And Credit
Debt And Credit

It is worth noting that when net credit balances have plunged very negative levels it has been the “fuel” for a major mean reverting event at some point in the future.

As I stated above, I both agree and disagree with the statement that margin debt levels are simply a function of market activity and have no bearing on the outcome of the market.

By itself, margin debt is inert.

Investors can leverage their existing portfolios and increase buying power to participate in rising markets. While “this time could certainly be different,” the reality is that leverage of this magnitude is “gasoline waiting on a match.”

When an event eventually occurs, it creates a rush to liquidate holdings. The subsequent decline in prices eventually reaches a point which triggers an initial round of margin calls. Since margin debt is a function of the value of the underlying “collateral,” the forced sale of assets will reduce the value of the collateral further triggering further margin calls. Those margin calls will trigger more selling forcing more margin calls, so forth and so on.

Notice in the chart below that margin debt reductions begin innocently enough before accelerating sharply to the downside. This time will likely be no different.

Margin Debt Reductions
Margin Debt Reductions

Last week, Jonathan Tepper (@jtepper2) asked about margin debt as a percent of the economy.

The idea is that since the stock market should be somewhat reflective of underlying economic activity, then the correlation between the markets, leverage and economic growth should provide some clues as to future outcomes. Unfortunately, it does.

Debt And The Economy
Debt And The Economy

Jonathan also took it from an interesting perspective as well, considering disposable personal incomes. To wit:

Debt And Income
Debt And Income

Margin debt to market capitalization also provides some interesting insights.

Debt And market Cap
Debt And market Cap

Spikes in the margin debt to market capitalization ratio have been historically consistent with short-term market peaks and the beginning of major corrections. Currently, the recent spike higher has led to some stagnation in the market and will be worth watching as we head into the seasonally weak summer months.

Here is the important point. It is not rising level of debt that is the problem, it is the decline which marks peaks in both market and economic expansions.

A Technical Take

Now, my friend Greg Morris absolutely hates it when people apply technical analysis to economic data. However, I hope he will grant me a consideration here because I think it is a fruitful exercise.

The following three charts examine margin debt as it relates to the financial markets by utilizing the 12-month moving average, relative strength, and stochastic analysis. Unlike a stock price chart, we are using the technical analysis in this case to understand how aggressively investors are leverage up portfolios as a sign of excessive exuberance, or capitulatory buying.

The first is the 12-month moving average of margin debt. When margin debt has fallen below the 12-month moving average, it has been indicative of market corrections. The blue highlights are where margin debt did dip below its 12-month average, which corresponded with trouble in the markets. Currently, with margin debt levels well above the average, it was not surprising to see the markets move higher in February. However, given the recent struggles in March, it would suggest some correction in leverage has occurred. But currently, the trend in margin debt remains positive suggesting the bullish backdrop for investors remains supportive for the remainder of the seasonally strong period.

Debt And The S&P 500
Debt And The S&P 500

The next chart is a Stochastic Oscillator of margin debt. The vertical red bars highlight when the oscillator has declined below 50 on a scale of 0 to 100. As with margin debt itself, it is not the increase of the oscillator that is important but rather the decline. When the oscillator falls BELOW 50, and approaches ZERO, is when the markets have either been in short-term corrections or full blown reversions. As of February, the oscillator had recovered from its pre-election correction and is once again approaching 100. This suggests, the current bull market remain intact for now and could remain throughout the remainder of the seasonally strong period. However, be on the look out for summer weakness from a timing standpoint.

Stochastic Oscillator Of Margin Debt
Stochastic Oscillator Of Margin Debt

The relative strength index of margin debt is also another way to look at how fast investors are leveraging up portfolios. As discussed above, when margin debt is rising strongly, so are the markets. Conversely, when market participants become worried about the markets and begin to unwind leverage, which requires selling, that markets have historically run into trouble.

Margin Debt's Relative Strength
Margin Debt's Relative Strength

It is when margin debt’s RSI has exceeded 80, and begins to decline, which has generally been indicative of short-term corrections and major market declines. RSI peaked above 80 prior to the election and declined as the markets ran into trouble over the concerns of a “Trump Election.” However, that negativity quickly reversed election night as the “Trump Trade” got underway and fueled a resurgence of buying exuberance with investors levering up their portfolios once again.

With RSI now climbing back towards 80, as with the stochastic indicator above, it suggests the current bullish trend remains intact most likely for the remainder of the seasonally strong period. However, there have been periods where the market reversed with the RSI at levels lower than 80, so don’t get complacent.

Since the markets remain near all-time highs, does this mean the indicator is flawed and should not be paid attention to? Hardly. What it does suggest is that much like the late 90’s, exuberance is pressing stocks higher even as many of the underlying technical and fundamental indicators suggest this should not be the case.

Conclusion

These different measures of margin debt all suggest that investors should be cautious of the markets currently. While the bullish trend currently remains intact, and will likely remain so for the remainder of the seasonally strong period, it doesn’t mean investors should become overly complacent. Risks of a more substantial correction have risen due to a deterioration in economic data, fundamental data and the length of time itself.

Currently, margin debt is still rising as the “fear of missing out” on potential upside in the market is trumping longer-term logic of risk management and portfolio controls. However, this has always been the case with investors historically as the chase for returns leads to “buying tops” and “selling bottoms.” This time will very likely turn out similarly.

As I stated, the important thing to remember about margin debt is that alone it is inert and poses no real danger to the market. However, when combined with the correct catalyst, it will act as an accelerant to a market correction when forced liquidations fuel additional selling.

Debt Vs. S&P 500
Debt Vs. S&P 500

Few investors have survived the corrections that in hindsight were deemed “obvious.” However, in the short-term, these dangers remain dismissed as the markets continue to climb a “wall of worry.”

But that is a climb that does not last forever.

Leverage Hits All-Time High
 

Related Articles

Leverage Hits All-Time High

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments
Apr 04, 2017 10:45PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Finally an indifferent analyst with interesting insights: Chart 3) orange says down with higher probabilities anymore, why? because after secondary mountains the downward movement has more huge crashes. Pinky level touched almost rooftop and seems like a BB. When is close rooftop goes downwards. So more probabilities for a minor to major crash. Chart 4) It's easy to realise that we are in a bubble and that FED needs to burst it. Chart 5) Your margin debt as a % of the economy might react as a leading indicator if you check from the past of your graph. Even at the 87-91 period as the margin gets lowered we can pinpoint that the real S&P index can't have rising momentum. Increased probabilities that we will have a minor correction defo. Chart 6) Individually I would desire to see an unlogged price in your chart to distinguish more things. Chart 7) stochastics-margin reminds (85)- 87-91 era too, also has divergences that point for a downward movement. more probabilities
Reply
0 0
Apr 04, 2017 10:45PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
last chart) leverage at all time highs, but if we go at the microcosm we see S&P lowering down and if we take the margin debt as a timeline when it was going upwards faster in time we had faster the huge corrections, but if we see it as a with less rising momentum is more stretched in time as a line, so we are closer than ever to a new minor, big or major correction (fears also of a huge instant one, why? crash of 1987 for example: ''This bull market had been fueled by low interest rates, hostile takeovers, leveraged buyouts and merger mania''. ''Many companies were scrambling to raise capital to buy each other out. The business philosophy of the time was that companies could grow exponentially simply by constantly acquiring other companies''. ''IPOs were also becoming a commonplace driver of market excitement''. (snaps is in and comes the major one in 2018 of the biggest oil producer, would they like the crash to happen near their IPO?) This is why you went in Indonesia? to hedge?
Reply
0 0
Apr 04, 2017 10:45PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
physical buy after a fed interest hike suits also better to cover the situation while more interest rate hikes are coming in. ''“Microcomputers” now known as personal computers were become a fast growing industry. People started to view the personal computer as a revolutionary tool that would change our way of life, while creating wonderful business opportunities. The investing public eventually became caught up in a contagious euphoria that was similar to that of any other historic bubble and market crash. This euphoria made investors, as usual, believe that the stock market would “always go up.”'' Change to microcomputers the word to smartphones and the personal computers to mobile phones. ''the SEC conducted numerous investigations of illegal insider trading, which created a wary stance among many investors.'' ''The Federal Reserve rapidly raised short term interest rates to temper inflation, which dampened some of stock investors’ enthusiasm'' And an extra for Da Vinci fans
Reply
0 0
Apr 04, 2017 10:45PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Year Nominal Price Inflation Adjusted Price 1980 $37.42 $109.51. 1981 $35.75 $94.83. 1982 $31.83 $79.50. 1983 $29.08 $70.34. 1984 $28.75 $66.67. 1985 $26.92 $60.27. 1986 $14.44 $31.72. 1987 $17.75 $37.62. 1988 $14.87 $30.33. 1989 $18.33 $35.60 who am I and why I will fall probably? (think also if someone is stretching the indices price and doesn't stretch me, and in the past stretched me, but not the indices price what is the most possible to occur to both of us?)
Reply
0 0
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email