Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Technically Speaking For The Week Of June 18-22

Published 06/24/2018, 03:36 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

Summary

While the trade war rhetoric is heating up, oil supplies are increasing.

It was an odd week from a performance perspective.

The overall market tenor is still positive.

Recessions are caused by shocks - events that are so large they gum up the natural flows of the underlying economy. Oil price spikes are the most common. Financial events - which caused the last two US recessions - also lead to downturns. A trade war would also do the trick, which is why the continued escalation in trade tensions is so scary for economists. This week, Trump stated he would tax an additional $200 billion in Chinese imports; the Chinese stated they'd retaliate. Then, on Friday, the NY Times reported that the EU has imposed tariffs on politically-sensitive items. We're now starting to hear stories about the negative ramifications of these developments. The reporting only focuses on individual companies so far. But expect the damage to begin spreading.

Thankfully, it looks like oil prices won't be a problem as OPEC has agreed to increase supplies:

OPEC meets Russia and other allies on Saturday to clinch a new deal raising oil output, a day after agreeing a production hike within the group itself but confusing the market as to how much more oil it will pump.

...

OPEC said in a statement that it would raise supply by returning to 100 percent compliance with previously agreed output cuts, but gave no concrete figures.

As I've noted several times before, oil price shocks were the primary causes of most recessions during the 1970s, '80s, and '90s (for more on this, please see the academic research of James Hamilton). But it looks like that won't happen this time around.

Believe it or not, the immigration debate has a strong economic component. Potential GDP is derived from two statistics: population growth and productivity increases. The more people a country has and the more productive its economy, the higher its potential economic growth. And the US has a population growth problem:

Y/Y Percentage Change in Civilian Noninstitutional Population

(Data from St. Louis FRED; author's calculations)

Above is a chart of the Y/Y percentage change in the noninstitutional civilian population from which the economy draws workers. The blue trend line is a linear regression of the trend, which is moving lower. We see the same trend with the longer moving averages:

1, 2, and 3-Year MAs of Percent Change in Civilian Population

(Data from St. Louis FRED; author's calculations)

The 1-, 2-, and 3-year moving averages of the Y/Y percentage change in population growth are all moving lower. This partially explains why projected real GDP from any number of sources has been declining. Without an influx of new people, future US growth will be weaker.

Turning to the indexes, this was an odd week:

Indexes Data Table

Let's start with the obvious question: why is the iShares Micro-Cap (NYSE:IWC) up .84% when the iShares Russell 2000 (NYSE:IWM) - the other, large, small-cap ETF - has barely advanced? I have no answer for that. Aside from that odd development, the Treasury market outperformed stocks this week, with the major Treasury market ETFs up marginally. Transportation was the big loser this week largely due to ramped-up trade war rhetoric - increased tariffs translate into diminished trade and therefore fewer companies shipping goods from point A to point B. The DIA's weaker performance relative to the SPY shows the extreme disadvantage of having an index comprised of 30 stocks instead of 500.

Let's turn to the charts, starting with this week's 5-minute time frame:

SPY 5 Min Chart

While there is a great deal of volatility in the chart, prices traded in a narrow 3-point range. The 200-minute EMA implies a slight downward bias, but only marginally.

DIA 5 Min Chart

Like the SPY, the DIA traded in a very narrow range - a mere 4 points. Here, prices dropped sharply at Tuesday's open and then traded sideways for the remainder of the week.

Next, let's look at the 30-minute charts:

SPY 30 Min Chart

The SPY formed an arc from late May through mid-June. Prices are now consolidating in a triangle pattern around the 200-minute EMA.

QQQ 30 Min Chart

The QQQ have a somewhat stronger rally than the SPY. But prices are now consolidating as well.

And finally, here are the daily charts:

QQQ Daily Chart

After breaking through the 174.5 level, prices for QQQ are now falling back to the 10-day EMA. They're also using the trend-line connecting the early and late May lows. However, the MACD has given a short-term sell signal.

SPY Daily Chart

The SPY pattern is similar to the QQ.

IWM Daily Chart

The real winner for the last month is clearly IWM. It moved through resistance in mid-May and has continued to move higher. But prices have broken the trendline and the MACD has also given a sell-signal.

So, where does that leave us in the week ahead? I'd say the probability for a modest decline. The IWM - which have led the market higher - appear as if they want to do a bit of profit taking. And the DIA and QQQ MACDs have both given a sell signal. But also remember that the underlying economic and earnings environment is very strong, so any drop will be limited.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Original post

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.