
Please try another search
I thought there was sufficient evidence to argue against a "bull trap" in the S&P 500, but it would appear the market wasn't interested in such thoughts, and sellers were quick to reverse the initial push above 4,200.
Adding to the pain were new 'sell' triggers in MACD and On-Balance-Volume, although the former occurred above the 'bullish' zero line, making it a weak signal. Selling volume ranked as distribution as selling momentum picked up speed. The index is also underperforming relative to the Russell 2000.
The Nasdaq breakout is still in play with technicals holding. What bulls are still in play will be focused on the Nasdaq as there isn't anywhere else for them to go. While the S&P 500 closed with a standard bearish candlestick, the Nasdaq held on with a more neutral doji. This lays the groundwork for a more bullish response tomorrow. The relative outperformance of the index over the S&P 500 also helps the bullish cause.
The Russell 2000 (IWM) pushed out of its price congestion zone to only run into its 200-day MA and reverse with a sizable, bearish inverse hammer. It then delivered another loss, only to find support at the nearby 50-day MA.
Technicals are mixed, mostly bullish, but with a constant switch of the signal line for On-Balance-Volume. The index hasn't moved into a period of outperformance to the Nasdaq, but it has for the S&P 500.
This index is acting like the decider between the bullish Nasdaq and the bearish S&P 500, and at the moment, bears have a slight edge; an undercut of the 50-day MA would push this more sharply in favor of bears.
Feeding into the general market weakness is the accelerating losses in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Technicals are net bearish and have only the 200-day MA left to break before things get scarier. One to watch.
The Semiconductor Index is also feeling the pinch as it gave up its breakout. This could be a bad sign for the Nasdaq as it looks to protect its own.
With Memorial weekend coming, there are only a couple more days of trading before traders jet off for the long weekend. I still think bulls have more to play with than current trading suggests, but we don't want to get away with a concerted act of selling.
This is not something we have seen yet, but the groundwork is there for this to happen.
A few years ago, I was studying the relationship between the major stock market indexes and their volatility indexes, and I came across and an intriguing phenomenon. The vast...
As one who tracks market sentiment, it still amazes me to watch it develop in real-time. And we see it quite well in the analyst community as well. Let me give you an example. Many...
With junior traders likely to be still holding the reigns after the long weekend, it was worrisome to see 'black' candlesticks pop into the charts of the Nasdaq and S&P 500. If...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.