
Please try another search
Unemployment claims unexpectedly rose to the highest level in 8 weeks.
Seasonally-adjusted initial claims for the week ending Oct. 10 rose to 898,000 from 845,000 according to the Department of Labor.
That's the highest total since 1,011,000 on Aug. 22.
The BLS changed its methodology for counting initial claims effective Aug. 29. The change artificially lowered the counts for that week.
Since the BLS did not revise back, the weeks starting Aug. 29 are distorted vs the weeks prior.
Continued state unemployment claims lag initial claims by a week.
Continued claims are more important than initial claims. It is continued claims that determine the official unemployment rate.
The rate is set by survey on the week that contains the 13th of the month, the weeks in boxes.
Seasonally-adjusted continued claims fell from 11,183,000 last week to 10,018,00 this week.
However, continued claims are distorted by three factors.
Bloomberg Econoday has this interesting blurb last week regarding California.
California is now offline when it comes to claims data as it scrambles to limit unemployment fraud. With the weekly estimate for the US's largest state now frozen at a prior level of more than 260,000, forecasters see total initial claims easing slightly but not substantially to 819,000 in the October 3 week.
California is still offline. I assure you fraud goes well beyond California.
Primary PUA Claims in 2020
Unlike state claims, PUA applies to people working part-time, gig workers, and self-employed workers who do not qualify regular state unemployment programs.
Over 11 million people receive PUA. This is where most of the fraud is hidden.
I suspect most of it is not fraud, but no one knows the real numbers due to the loosy-goosy nature of the program.
In terms of determining unemployment, I suspect that at least 2 million of those 11 million are genuinely unemployed.
Like PUA Claims, All Continued Claims are not seasonally adjusted.
They lag continued claims by a week and initial claims by 2 weeks.
Over 25 million people receive some assistance. That number, minus fraud and mistakes should feed the U6 (alternate unemployment rate).
The latest jobs report came out on Oct. 2 as discussed in Job Recovery Slows and Headwinds Mount for October
The BLS says the number of unemployed is 12,580,000.
The Unemployment Rate = #unemployed / Labor Force.
UR = 12,580,000 / 160,143,000 = 7.9%
But continued claims for the reference week were 11,979,000.
PUA claims are over 11 million. Some number of them (2,000,000 to 4,000,000) are genuinely unemployed.
Even if we assume only 1 million of those 11 million are unemployed, the BLS unemployment rate is too low.
Take my low-end guess of an additional 2 million, the unemployment rate is (11,979,000 + 2,000,000) / 160,143,000 = 8.7% vs the BLS claim of 7.9%.
If we assume PUA fraud or errors at 4 million (a generous to the BLS assumption) we can make the following calculation:
The U6 Unemployment rate would be (25,290,325 - 4,000,000) / 160,143,000 = 13.3% not the reported 12.8%.
Now that the US economy is totally dependent on trillions of dollars in stimulus and speculative gains reaped from the stimulus, there is no Real Economy left to pick up the pieces...
Could monetary conditions be supportive of the “soft landing” scenario? While the “recession” versus “no recession” debate rages, there is a precedent for a “soft landing”...
(Friday market open) The debt ceiling fight is over and May jobs data are in. The U.S. economy created a massive 339,000 jobs last month as the labor market showed no signs of...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.