Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
💎 Reveal Undervalued Stocks Hiding in Any Market Get Started

NASDAQ 100 Should Reach $17,000 Before Downside Risk Increases

By Dr. Arnout ter Schure Stock MarketsNov 17, 2021 01:50PM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/nasdaq-100-should-reach-17000-before-downside-risk-increases-200608691
NASDAQ 100 Should Reach $17,000 Before Downside Risk Increases
By Dr. Arnout ter Schure   |  Nov 17, 2021 01:50PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
 
NDX
+0.91%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

It had been about a month since I provided an Elliott Wave Principle (EWP) based update on the Nasdaq 100. Back then, I was looking for either “a bounce to reach $15,000-15,500” or a rally to around “15,700-15,900.” Fast forward, and the market has invalidated the bounce option as it reached as high as $16,454 by Nov. 5, dropped to $15,905 on Nov. 10, and sits now at $15,915. Thus, the index rallied slightly higher than anticipated as the 3rd wave of the new impulse higher started from the early-October lows extended. But this fits the saying “in bull markets upside surprises and downside disappoints” very well. Please keep it in mind.

That said, now that the bounce is off the table and a new impulse higher option/path was chosen/taken by the markets, it is time to ask: What’s next?

Figure 1 below shows the two options the market has now. Both are bullish, and both target ideally around $17,000 before the NDX is ready to embark on the subsequent more significant correction. Allow me to explain below.

Figure 1 NDX100 daily candlestick charts with detailed EWP count and technical indicators.

NASDAQ 100 Daily Chart.
NASDAQ 100 Daily Chart.

The first option (Figure 1A) has the NDX in (orange) micro-5 of (grey) minute wave-iii, of (green) minor wave-5 of (red) intermediate wave-iii. For now, this is as many wave degrees as I would like to focus on. It means we should see a local top soon (all of minute-iii), ideally around $16.6K+/-200. Then a minute-iv decline to ideally around $16.2K+/-200 followed by a final minute-v wave to ideally $17K+/-200. This last wave will then complete intermediate-iii, and from the EWP, we know after the 3rd wave come the 4th and 5th waves. Besides, at ~$17K, the index has reached the (red) 161.80% Fibonacci-extension of wave-i, measured from the (early March) wave-ii low. A classic, standard, typical 3rd wave target. If reached, I anticipate wave-iv to drop back to, ideally, the 100% Fib-extension at around $15135 before wave-v rallies the index to $18K+ to complete (black) major wave-3.

The second option (Figure 1B) is the index will directly rally to $17K+/-200 for all of (grey) minute wave-v, which in this case may then only target the (green) 200% Fib-extension at ~$16.6K. Close enough to the as mentioned earlier ideal (red) intermediate wave-iii upside target.

At this stage, there’s no way knowing just yet which of these two reasonably bullish, albeit short-term, options the market will take. But as long as the index can hold above last week’s $15,905 low, we should look higher. Hence, as always, please know the time frame you are trading because once ~$17K is reached, in my opinion, the downside risk increases 10-15%, before the next 20% rally starts.

Besides, the Santa Rally may, therefore, not arrive this year, but that does not mean the bull is over. Far from it.

NASDAQ 100 Should Reach $17,000 Before Downside Risk Increases
 

Related Articles

NASDAQ 100 Should Reach $17,000 Before Downside Risk Increases

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (10)
Peter ONeill
Peter ONeill Dec 14, 2021 11:43AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Nasdaq is up 80%+ in 18 months yet GDP in the same time has been flat. Most companies are trading 40%+ their long-term PE Ratios. Plus most only project growth of 3-4% next year. Debt has also increased by 35% in the past 18 months. If anything Nasdaq's natural level based on natural trajectory pre covd verus this artificial FED level is closer to 10,000 not 15,000 and certainly no way near 17,000 (if it was the market would be at 110% growth in 24 months!!! Bubble beyond bubbles...
Matthew Rambusch
Matthew Rambusch Nov 20, 2021 1:58PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
What do you think lcid will do monday
Chad PoorerThanYou
Chad PoorerThanYou Nov 18, 2021 1:26PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Good one thanks. Minor. why do you Dr. yourself? People can look you up on the business network.
Mark Brovchuk
Mark Brovchuk Nov 17, 2021 11:43PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
This index gained nearly to 1900 points over a month, had bull runs of 42 days with 3 days sale. And you think it should gain a ”bit” more?)
Rajesh Patel
Rajesh Patel Nov 17, 2021 10:30PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
So much analysis to tell nasdaq is going up
Kool Aid
Kool Aid Nov 17, 2021 10:07PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Thanks as always doc.  It's much appreciated!   For the haters on here, I suggest you go back and look at some of the calls this guy has made before you flame.  Then decide if his advice, which mind you on this site is free, is worth at least using as a data point.
Dr. Arnout ter Schure
Dr. Arnout ter Schure Nov 17, 2021 10:07PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
thank you! KA, trolls will be trolls. very few people are open-minded, want to learn, or want to even try to put in an effort to remotely understand certain concepts. you are one of few. these trolls are what I call "online click-n-jerk heroes". dime a dozen. but when push comes to shove they have nothing to show for as inside they are actually frightened, insecure, and unintelligent. Hence, their comments as they are.
germann muravchik
germann muravchik Nov 17, 2021 8:31PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Mr elliot died poor, are you sure his theory works. are you sure you counted correctly?
Casino Crypt
CasinoCrypt Nov 17, 2021 6:34PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Great analysis - however inflation genie is out of the bottle (confirmed solidly by todays inflation data ) and this will create havoc ultimately.
Stephen Fa
Stephen Fa Nov 17, 2021 6:13PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Eventually, the rising channel in this TA will break.  Beware.
Casino Crypt
CasinoCrypt Nov 17, 2021 6:13PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Remember Fed has "extraordinary vehicles" with which to support equity as it has done since 2016.
Chris Poulos
Chris Poulos Nov 17, 2021 2:46PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
im inclined to think that the nasdaq 'should' drop 50% very soon ... current valuations are absurd. the economy is tanking but everybody on wall street is too drunk on making money to notice. why do you think musk is selling now?
Show previous replies (4)
John Lakran
John Lakran Nov 17, 2021 2:46PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I'm with you Chris making new highs at 65% of normal volume shows me we are running out of steam but I've been wrong for a year but what I do know is fundamental valuations are well beyond historic averages by 40% or more so to me this says either earnings or gdp must grow by 40% and fast or eventually we end up back at the average. I'm out of this market I'll take the inflation loss vs a market loss which has potential to be 40 or 50%. Not sure on this wave stuff sounds good and makes sense but it also requires you to purchase assets at unsustainable prices that pretty much everyone agrees is at an extreme level but the bears gave up, the fed keeps printing when they should have done 3 rate increases and stopped all bond buys months ago. Should be fun to watch for me
Dr. Arnout ter Schure
Dr. Arnout ter Schure Nov 17, 2021 2:46PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Louis Lipps because it imho still has to warp up, as clearly shown in my chats, this current iii of 3 wave (days to weeks) then do iv of 3 (weeks) followed by v of 3 (weeks). After that we still have to content us with wave 4 and again wave 5. Each will be months. Thus by the time wave 5 is done we are looking at end of next year. After that it still has to crash, and setting ul that crash wave takes time.
Dr. Arnout ter Schure
Dr. Arnout ter Schure Nov 17, 2021 2:46PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
John Lakran volume is not that important as long as total $ amount traded stays the same: buying 1000 shares at $1 is taking the same risk as buying 1 share at $1000. Volume has dropped a factor of 1000, but one is still taking the same risk. Its called “churn”.
Louis Lipps
Louis Lipps Nov 17, 2021 2:46PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Dr. Arnout ter Schure  How about energy?
Casino Crypt
CasinoCrypt Nov 17, 2021 2:46PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
There will be never more than a 5 to 8% correction drop because the Fed will support it. Analyze very closely the two big periods (post Covid) where we had between 5 and 7 weeks of solid down trend on the major indices and you can see the Central Bank(s) intervening, swooping in and clean lifting them onto safe solid "ledges" so to speak. Very clean and very obvious.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email