Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Nasdaq 100 May Need to Dip Before Rallying Again

Published 12/02/2022, 01:53 PM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

Two weeks ago, see here, we found for the Nasdaq 100 (NDX) using the Elliott Wave Principle (EWP),

"… the general path laid out in late October remains our focus and is filling in rather well. Once black W-a tops (ideally around $12-12.6K), I still expect a sizable pullback first (W-b) to ideally $11.2K +/- 200 before the next rally (W-c) starts to ideally $13.8-15.4K. I can narrow this target zone down once more price data becomes available."

After two weeks of sideways consolidation, the index broke higher on Powell's speech on Wednesday and reached $12115 yesterday, only to drop lower on better than expected jobs report today. As the saying goes, "The market giveth, the market taketh away." The index is only 1.7% higher since my last update, so the question is: where does all this whipsawing lead us?

Nasdaq Daily Chart

See figure 1 above. My primary expectation is that the index topped yesterday for an irregular b-wave of an irregular flat in EWP terms (see example here). It should now be working on the final (red) c-wave lower to ideally $11300-11600 for the larger black W-b before the next rally (black W-c of blue W-B) to ideally $13.8-15.4K starts. The technical indicators look slightly tired, with negative divergences (dotted orange line), and ready to move lower. But that is a condition, not a signal.

Namely and however, if the bears cannot muster a breakdown, then the alternative option I am tracking becomes operable. In that case, a more immediate five-wave rally to ideally $13.2+/-2K will become the primary path. See figure 2 below.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Figure 2. Nasdaq Daily Chart

Just as a reminder, while some misunderstand the EWP and my work, claiming that I'm saying the market will either go up or down, I only look at it from the perspective of probabilities because there are no certainties. Therefore, everything has to be approached with "if/then" views. I provide those perspectives by ranking probabilistic movements based on the structure of the price action. I offer a primary EWP perspective, and if that pattern breaks due to the price breaking above or below a certain level, it tells us that the assessment was wrong. The alternative EWP option is then operable. In a probabilistic environment, there's never one option. If there were, then it would not be a probabilistic environment but a certainty. This approach is like an army general preparing a primary battle plan and, simultaneously, a contingency plan if the initial battle plans do not work. We prepare for battling the markets in the same manner.

Bottom Line

Two weeks ago, we found that:

"The general path laid out in late October remains our focus and is filling in rather well. Once black W-a tops (ideally around $12-12.6K), I still expect a sizable pullback first (W-b) to ideally $11.2K +/- 200 before the next rally (W-c) starts to ideally $13.8-15.4K. I can narrow this target zone down once more price data becomes available."

After two weeks of go-nowhere price action, the NDX finally reached the ideal target zone yesterday. It topped at $12,1K. Today's decline should be the initiation of the final decline to that W-b target zone before W-c starts. That is the primary battle plan. Our contingency plan is that on a more immediate breakout above yesterday's high, we will look for the index to reach $13.2+/-2K without a more significant pullback.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Latest comments

Nice insights thank you but this time you say what any newbie would say.. It might go up or down.
No that is not what I was saying. What I say is thst my preffered view was and is for lower. But that view is only wrong if we see a breakout. Big difference! Otherwise I would say “it might go up or down”. But I never say or said that. It be a useless statement.
thanks for the article! love your work!
The black a and b-wave above seem to be small and short compared to the previous black a- and b-wave, don‘t you think? Shouldn‘t we assume that the zigzag pattern of November could be a running flat correction as the green-w4 of red c of black a? In this case last price action would be the green- 5, completing black a and black b down would be just about to start.
But I thought at the start of the year you said we would be at 18,000 by the end of the year and attacked anyone who dared to disagree with you in the comments - as you are an 'expert' hahahaha. I guess the Santa Rally will be 50%+ this year? ;)
Being wrong is acceptable, but staying wrong is totally unacceptable.Jack Schwager.
 Saying you are right if the market moves x way, but also you will be right if the market moves in the complete opposite direction. Then claiming you are right in most of your posts as 'I said it could be A or B ....and B happened so I got it right'. Its even being right or wrong - its talking BS. Youd have better luck reading tea leaves and guessing that the person name begins with a C and drives a blue car.
Its not* even being right or wrong
thank You!
Heads I win, tails you lose! Great analysis! LOL
I knew there was a reason I should not have ditched math class, hmmm...
+/-2K Really. I thought it was a Typo Mistake
How quantum. thanks
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.