Breaking News
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

2 Insurance ETFs Offer Value In An Increasingly Risky World

By (Tezcan Gecgil/ )ETFsSep 24, 2020 06:38AM ET
2 Insurance ETFs Offer Value In An Increasingly Risky World
By (Tezcan Gecgil/ )   |  Sep 24, 2020 06:38AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items

As west coast wildfires continue burning in the US and hurricane season ramps up, with hurricanes Sally, Isaias, Laura, Paulette, Alpha, Beta, Teddy and others already making headlines, the potential for massive amounts of damage is multifold. For those on the ground, loss of life, property and possessions are the most devastating aspects of such calamities.

From an economic perspective, there are various costs associated with such unforeseen events. According to United Policyholders (UP), a non-profit advocacy group, the recent wildfires will likely cost "insurers between $7.5 billion and $10 billion.” In the end, the total economic cost is likely to be a lot greater, given that the loss of human and animal life as well as the environmental impact.

Another enormous risk hitting the global economy: coronavirus. The worldwide pandemic has brought the importance of health insurance to the forefront.

With risk looming in an increasingly dangerous world, the demand for insurance is growing rapidly. And it's not just because of increased hazards from natural disasters and viruses, but also in developing countries with large and growing middle-class populations such as China.

For all these reasons, insurance companies are in the ideal position to benefit from growing demand for their services given the high-profit potential of their business models. Even with escalating risks, the majority of people paying insurance premiums rarely file claims, making the business model for insurance companies ever more profitable.

Today, we'll delve into the insurance industry from an investing standpoint and introduce two exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that should be on your radar:

Size Of The Industry

In 2018, net premiums written in the insurance industry in the US, the world’s biggest insurance market, totaled $1.22 trillion. However, over the past decade, China has “almost tripled its world market share. In contrast, the share of mature markets (North America, Western Europe and Japan) declined by around 14pp.”

The industry employs close to 3 million people stateside where there are about 6,000 insurance companies. Property/casualty (P/C) insurers—primarily auto, homeowners and commercial insurance—account for around 40% of the companies. Net premiums written for the sector totaled $618.0 billion in 2018.

As for the rest of the companies, Health insurers and life/annuity insurers make up 15% and 13%, respectively.

Life/annuity sub-sector consists of annuities, accident and health, and life insurance. However, there are also companies that specialize in health insurance.

Lloyd's of London, also known as Lloyd’s, is the world’s largest insurance and reinsurance market entity.

Liability-Driven Market

Like buying insurance, investing in the industry can seem daunting at times. It is important investors consider the different characteristics of the market. Insurance companies are part of the financial services industry. However, there are differences between them and, for example, banks because they have a set of future liabilities that they have to pay in the case of a qualifying insurance claim, making them liability-driven.

Also, insurance companies closely practice asset-liability management, which differs from asset-only management strategies that aim to minimize portfolio risk while maximizing returns.

Since insurers have to invest premiums conservatively so claims can be met easily when they are due, they invest in fixed-income securities, such as U.S. government bonds as well as AAA-rated bonds from large corporations. Interest rates, understandably affect the duration and maturities of the bonds in their portfolios.

Their choice of portfolio holdings may also depend on the insurance offered. For example, by definition, life insurers commit to payouts decades in the future. Although long-term liabilities also allow for longer investment horizons, a pandemic such as COVID-19 may directly affect their liabilities. Or if the bonds held in portfolios get downgraded, capital requirements for insurers may change, putting pressure on financial stability. As a result, insurer risk appetite as well as premium rates may be affected.

1. Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF

  • Current price: $54.72
  • 52-week range: $44.46 – $76.48
  • Dividend Yield: 2.42%
  • Expense ratio: 0.35%

The Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (NASDAQ:KBWP) provides exposure to a range of property and casualty insurance companies.

KBWP Daily
KBWP Daily

KBWP, which has 24 holdings, follows the KBW NASDAQ Property & Casualty index. Since it is a modified market capitalization-weighted index, no holding makes up more than 9% of assets.

The top ten names compose about 60% of the fund. Progressive (NYSE:PGR), Allstate (NYSE:ALL), Travelers Companies, (NYSE:TRV), Chubb (NYSE:CB) 8.02% and American International Group (NYSE:AIG) lead the list of companies in KBWP.

In terms of sub-sectors, funds are distributed among Property & Casualty Insurance (69.6%), Multi-line Insurance (21.62%) and Reinsurance (8.78%).

Year-to-date, the fund is down about 22%. Trailing P/E and P/B ratios stand at 12.72 and 1.05. Contrarian investors who are also looking for value may want to put KBWP on their shopping list. As part of portfolio diversification, we'd consider buying the dips.

2. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF

  • Current price: $27.02
  • 52-week range: $20.23 – $37.57
  • Dividend yield: 2.77%
  • Expense ratio: 0.35%

The S&P Insurance ETF (NYSE:KIE) gives exposure to a wide range of insurance companies.

KIE Weekly
KIE Weekly

KIE, which has 50 holdings, follows the KBW Insurance index. The top 10 companies comprise about 22% of assets under management which stands at $502 million. Put another way, regardless of market-capitalization, companies are equally-weighted in the portfolio, each has a weighting of around 2%.

eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH), Arthur J Gallagher & Co (NYSE:AJG), Assurant (NYSE:NYSE:AIZ) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MMC) are the top five names in the fund. The sub-sectors include Property & Casualty Insurance (43.24%), Life & Health Insurance (25.01%), Insurance Brokers (13.70%), Reinsurance (9.30%) and Multi-Line Insurance (8.74%).

The allocation shows that the fund invests in any businesses that has an insurance component, including insurance brokers. Investors should ideally review their investment objectives to see if they would like this kind of diversification.

Since the beginning of the year, the fund has also fallen by 22%. As a result, trailing P/E and P/B ratios stand at 10.88 and 0.72, respectively. We believe the fund offers value around these levels.

2 Insurance ETFs Offer Value In An Increasingly Risky World

Related Articles

Mike Paulenoff
Upward Price Pressure In Retail ETF By Mike Paulenoff - Jun 01, 2021

Back on May 14, with SPDR® S&P Retail ETF (NYSE:XRT) trading at 89.56, we discussed the following technical (and macro) setup with our MPTrader members:  "My conclusion technically...

2 Insurance ETFs Offer Value In An Increasingly Risky World

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Amy Bach
Amy Bach Sep 25, 2020 7:14PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
This article incorrectly identifies our organization as the source of an estimate of the CA wildfire losses - it was RMS that gave that estimate, not United Policyholders.  Thanks in advance for correcting.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email