Breaking News
Black Friday SALE: Up to 54% off InvestingPro! Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

How To Avoid The Worst Style ETFs Of 3Q16

By David TrainerETFsSep 14, 2016 01:21AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/how-to-avoid-the-worst-style-etfs-3q16-200153371
How To Avoid The Worst Style ETFs Of 3Q16
By David Trainer   |  Sep 14, 2016 01:21AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

Question: Why are there so many ETFs?

Answer: ETF providers tend to make lots of money on each ETF so they create more products to sell.

The large number of ETFs has little to do with serving your best interests. Below are three red flags you can use to avoid the worst ETFs:

  1. Inadequate Liquidity

This issue is the easiest issue to avoid, and our advice is simple. Avoid all ETFs with less than $100 million in assets. Low levels of liquidity can lead to a discrepancy between the price of the ETF and the underlying value of the securities it holds. Plus, low asset levels tend to mean lower volume in the ETF and larger bid-ask spreads.

  1. High Fees

ETFs should be cheap, but not all of them are. The first step here is to know what is cheap and expensive.

To ensure you are paying at or below average fees, invest only in ETFs with total annual costs below 0.48%, which is the average total annual cost of the 289 U.S. equity Style ETFs we cover. The weighted average is lower at 0.18%, which highlights how investors tend to put their money in ETFs with low fees.

Figure 1 shows AdvisorShares Athena High Dividend ETF (DIVI) is the most expensive style ETF and Schwab US Large-Cap (NYSE:SCHX) is the least expensive. AdvisorShares (NYSE:DIVI and NYSE:FWDD) and Absolute Shares (NYSE:WBID and NYSE:WBIB) each provide two of the most expensive ETFs while Schwab (SCHX, NYSE:SCHB, NYSE:SCHG) ETFs are among the cheapest.

Figure 1: 5 Least and Most Expensive Style ETFs

Least and Most Expensive Style ETFs
Least and Most Expensive Style ETFs

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Investors need not pay high fees for quality holdings. Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) earns our Very Attractive rating and has low total annual costs of only 0.03%.

On the other hand, State Street SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (NYSE:MDYV) holds poor stocks and receives our Dangerous rating, yet has low total annual costs of 0.17%. No matter how cheap an ETF, if it holds bad stocks, its performance will be bad. The quality of an ETFs holdings matters more than its price.

  1. Poor Holdings

Avoiding poor holdings is by far the hardest part of avoiding bad ETFs, but it is also the most important because an ETFs performance is determined more by its holdings than its costs. Figure 2 shows the ETFs within each style with the worst holdings or portfolio management ratings.

Figure 2: Style ETFs with the Worst Holdings

Style ETFs with the Worst Holdings
Style ETFs with the Worst Holdings

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

PowerShares (NYSE:EQAL, NYSE:PXLV, NYSE:EQWS, NYSE:PXSG) appears more often than any other providers in Figure 2, which means that they offer the most ETFs with the worst holdings.

PowerShares Russell 2000 Equal Weight Portfolio (NYSE:EQWS) is the worst rated ETF in Figure 2. State Street SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value (NYSE:MDYV), ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (NYSE:DIG), and PowerShares Russell 2000 Pure Growth Portfolio (NYSE:PXSG) also earn a Dangerous predictive overall rating, which means not only do they hold poor stocks, they charge high total annual costs.

Our overall ratings on ETFs are based primarily on our stock ratings of their holdings.

The Danger Within

Buying an ETF without analyzing its holdings is like buying a stock without analyzing its business and finances. Put another way, research on ETF holdings is necessary due diligence because an ETF’s performance is only as good as its holdings’ performance. Don’t just take our word for it, see what Barron’s says on this matter.

PERFORMANCE OF ETFs HOLDINGs = PERFORMANCE OF ETF

Disclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Martone receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme.

How To Avoid The Worst Style ETFs Of 3Q16
 

Related Articles

How To Avoid The Worst Style ETFs Of 3Q16

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email