Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Has Apple's Road To $150 Taken A Detour?

Published 03/03/2021, 03:21 PM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

In my last article on Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), I found it had adhered almost perfectly to the ideal Fibonacci-based Elliott Wave Principle count for quite some time, and that it, therefore, should bottom ideally around $129.50 before heading to $151.60.

However, Apple traded down to $118 last week and invalidated the "wave-4, 5" set up.

See Figure 1 below.

Because the EWP and any technical analyses, for that matter, are all about "anticipate, monitor and adjust if necessary," the decline last week forces me to adjust my EWP count on Apple. In this update, I have also included Apple's weekly and monthly charts for improved analyses, as different timeframes need to have aligned EWP counts.

Figure 1. Apple daily candlestick chart with technical indicators and preferred Elliott Wave count:

Apple Daily Candlestick Chart.

As said, the current decline is now too deep for a 4th wave. I have adjusted my EWP count to suggest the late-October low was a failed c-wave (does not end below the prior a-wave, the September low in this case). The stock then rallied clearly in a lovely Fibonacci-based impulse pattern to its recent all-time-high, struck two days before its "best-ever" earnings release on Jan. 27. Several other high-flying stocks (Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), Facebook (NASDAQ:FB), Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA)) are now also down double-digits on good earnings, showing that only relying on fundamentals is neither flawless trading and investing strategy.

Back to Apple. It currently has two options, as shown by the black and grey paths. Either rally from about current levels above the (grey) a/i low made in January to invalidate an impulse down or, indeed, form an impulsive wave down to ideally $115+/-2 to complete (red) intermediate wave-a. Then it should bounce back to resistance at around $130+/-10 for red wave-"b?" followed by another impulse down to $105+/-5 to complete red wave-c of wave-4 as a zigzag.

Figure 2. AAPL weekly and monthly candlestick chart with technical indicators and preferred Elliott Wave count:

Apple Weekly Chart.

The weekly chart above shows Apple would do an ideal 38.20% retrace of (black) major wave-3 at $105+/-5 (lower end of the black box), typical for the 4th wave of the same degree. Note the negative divergence on all technical indicators, dotted red arrows, strongly suggesting more downside is ahead of the next several weeks. The weekly chart lends itself very well for a coherent, logical EWP count matching the monthly chart.

The monthly chart above, note the log scale, is not any better regarding the negative divergence (orange dotted arrows) and, therefore, also foretells a larger pending correction. Given this chart's timeframe, it is most likely a warning of the (purple) Cycle-4 wave. This wave would bring Apple back to late-2018 levels ($30+/10). Sounds crazy? Not really. Cycle-2 was an 84% haircut, (blue) Primary-II was an 83% decline, and 2008 saw a 63% correction. Other corrective waves were all in the 30-50% range (not shown). Hence, Apple has experienced extensive corrections, and an 80+% drop for a Cycle 4 wave is, therefore, nothing out of the ordinary. If it has happened before, it can happen again. Besides, 4th waves often tend to erase the entire prior one-degree-lower 5th wave, just like the current Major-4 wave is doing. Knowing Primary-V started December 2018 at $35, I expect Cycle-4 will erase all of its gains.

Bottom line: Apple's deeper than anticipated decline forces me to abandon my preferred EWP count and look for lower prices first (ideally around $105+/-5) before the stock is ready to embark on its final rally to $150+. Once reached, it should see a market correction similar to, and of the same wave-degree as, the 83% decline from 1991 to 1997.

Latest comments

Is somebody here after 3 months to validate this prediction? What an accuracy Dr. Great job. I am just a bit scared about last sentence in this article. 83% down. That would hurt.
See Dr. as far as you predict a stock to increase in value, everyone is with you. When you start to be bearish on that, people start to complain. "Completely senseless", "You could be wrong this time", ... I find that very funny!
Dr. Arnout ter Schure is definitely one of the best technicians on the pitch at present. Keep them coming! 👍
Completely senseless.
It can go UP or DOWN
You could be wrong this time.
You said that it could happen anything, but you don't need Fibonacci to said that.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.