Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Gold Still Can't See Its Way Clear, But The S&P High Looks In Place For The Year

By Mark Mead BaillieCommoditiesApr 25, 2022 12:09AM ET
Gold Still Can't See Its Way Clear, But The S&P High Looks In Place For The Year
By Mark Mead Baillie   |  Apr 25, 2022 12:09AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items

Gold Scoreboard
Gold Scoreboard

First Gold: A mere seven days ago we were singing Gold's praises as its price for two consecutive weeks moved higher in bold defiance of the otherwise Short weekly parabolic trend. "Like salmon spawning upstream" we wrote; that was Gold's gleam.

But now a week hence, Gold has been reamed, recording its third-worst weekly change year-to-date in settling Friday at 1933. To be sure, we're maintaining our forecast high for this year of 2254; but for the present—in spite of all things as Gold-positive as for which one could ever wish—the evil, nasty, belligerent Short trend (as is its wont) seems pressing on price. Here are the weekly bars, the parabolic Short trend depicted by the four rightmost declining red dots:

Gold Weekly Bars And Parabolic Trends
Gold Weekly Bars And Parabolic Trends

The bad news is RUS state television's promoting this past Thursday that the RS-28 Sarmat missile can level New York City; but the price of Gold, struggling to see its way clear, dropped anyway. The good news by the above graphic is that such Short trend really looks short-lived, for Gold's broader bent across the chart clearly is to the upside.

Moreover, with the StateSide Money Supply ("M2") having just now topped the $22 trillion level, our forecast for Gold 2254 seems modest given the yellow metal's value of 4088 as shown in the opening Scoreboard. But one year at a time. Further, we deem Gold's gleam as the buy of a lifetime. To reprise the late, great Richard Russell: "There's never a bad time to buy Gold" ... especially with present price at but 47% of present value. Now as to the overvalued end of the spectrum...

Second the S&P 500: The mighty Index's high for this year (4819 on 04 January) is it from our perspective. Just as everything possible is positive for Gold, we find absolutely everything as negative for the stock market:

■ The recession-indicative yield curve is as flat as a pancake, be it 5-, 10-, or 30-year dough all yielding 2.9%, essentially double the S&P's yield (per Friday's 4272 settle) of 1.433%;

■ The Economic Barometer is a gyrating, recessive mess as we'll later show;

■ Q1 Earnings Season is very poor on the notion reports were supposed to be better post-COVID but clearly are not: only 54% of S&P constituents' earnings (thus far reported) bettered Q1 of 2021; post-COVID, shouldn't that be 100%? Oops;

■ The "live" price/earnings ratio of the S&P is at present 35.7x whereas its lifetime mean (to which the p/e historically always reverts) is 38% lower at 22.3x;

■ And then technically there's this daunting negative MACD (moving average convergence divergence) crossover on the S&P monthly chart for the past five years... Ouch! And sayonara 2022. Get ready to get ugly:

SPX 2017-2022 Monthly MACD
SPX 2017-2022 Monthly MACD

"But mmb, you can't will people out of the stock market..."

Oh that is one of your most salient comments there, Squire. This past week's last two trading days netted the S&P 500 a combined loss of -4.2%. But the S&P's MoneyFlow regressed into S&P points recorded a comparable loss of just half that at -2.1%. The interpretation? The "We won't sell because it always comes back!" crowd is alive and well, until they, too, begin to sell. So much for conventional wisdom, unless one has significant patience ---> Per the "Friendly Reminder Dept.", from October 2007 to April 2013 the S&P 500 did not make a new high, (just in case yer scorin' at home).

"So how low is low, mmb..."

Rather than assign a subjective percentage drop, whether measured from here (S&P 4272) or from the high (S&P 4819), 'tis our preference to assess price structure. And as we shared via text this past week: "Broadly we can see S&P 3587-3198". In turn, that's in perfectly reasonable— indeed long overdue—order for an overall correction from 26% to 34%. 'Course, regardless of our pose, nobody knows.

Still, in recent years we've mentioned the notion of the "Look Ma! No Earnings!" crash. So in that vein we today give a tip of the cap to Bloomy reportage in actually acknowledging this poor Earnings Season. And yet, Dow Jones Newswires continues to make reference to an (albeit all inflationary) StateSide "Hot Economy". Does this look "hot" to you?

Economic Barometer
Economic Barometer

The only "hot" metrics of this past week were marginal improvements in March's Housing Starts and Building Permits. The balance was a "cold" wind that blew for the month's Leading Indicators and Existing Home Sales, along with April's lower Index readings from the National Association of Home Builders and the Philly Fed. As for the broader graphic, 'tis a "gyrating, recessive mess" indeed. Cue Jerry Reed from '71: "When you're hot, you're hot. When you're not, you're not."

As for the FinMedia folks at large, our commendation to them for discovering the FedFundsFutures having already priced in a 50-basis-points rise per the Federal Open Market Committee come 04 May. We noted same three weeks ago in the 02 April missive, but 'tis better the news at least play ketchup than remain pickled, (sorry).

As to "The Now" for Gold, here next is the two-panel graphic of price's daily bars from three months ago-to-date on the left and 10-day Market Profile on the right. Therein you can see the near-term negativity as Gold's "Baby Blues" of regression trend consistency turn downward whilst price is pinned down near the bottom of the Profile:

Gold Dots Profile
Gold Dots Profile

And 'tis the same for Sister Silver, say no more:

Silver Dots Profile
Silver Dots Profile

Ahead of a critical week for incoming economic metrics, we'll wrap it here with these three notes:

■ "Researchers" report that millions of ably-eligible folks are choosing "indefinitely" to remain out of the workforce. We find it curiously coincident with such choice that—going by S&P/Experian's data on consumer credit defaults—they've just increased for the fourth consecutive month. Live by the credit card; die by the credit card.

■ One Tobias Adrian—The International Monetary Fund's Director for Monetary and Capital Markets—expressed concern this past week over the risk for further selling in the markets such that we may "...see a certain amount of readjustment of asset valuations going forward..." That's a quaint way of putting it, one has to say.

■ Ready for the Mother of all Metrics? Again with reference to it being a critical upcoming week for data from the "hot" economy, therein we'll get the first StateSide reading of Q1 Gross Domestic Product. The consensus is for a vastly reduced annualized pace of only +1.1%. But here's the killer: the consensus for the associated Chain Deflator is +7.3%. That is stagflation in spades, right there!

And Gold toward seeing its way clear remains so cheap through here!


Gold Still Can't See Its Way Clear, But The S&P High Looks In Place For The Year

Related Articles

Arkadiusz Sieron
Stagflation Could Make Gold Happy By Arkadiusz Sieron - Jul 01, 2022 3

The upcoming stagflation might be less severe than in the 1970s. So is the Fed’s reaction, which could mean good news for gold. There are many terrifying statements you can...

Gold Still Can't See Its Way Clear, But The S&P High Looks In Place For The Year

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Mr Doodl
Mr Doodl Apr 25, 2022 8:45AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
In fact, medium and long term technical indicators for the precious metals are bullish.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email