
Please try another search
It’s that time of year on Wall Street. All of the sell-side macro outlooks are arriving in our inboxes. Various sector-weight recommendations and year-end S&P 500 price targets are worth their weight in coal (in my cynical opinion). While I find sell-side research very valuable for charts and identifying important risks, my guess is as good as theirs in terms of where markets will venture in the coming months.
What’s unusual about this go-around, though, is that for the first time since at least 1999, the average strategist’s S&P 500 forecast for the end of the upcoming year is negative. We usually don’t see that much pessimism on the street. The obvious response is to figure out why the smartest folks in the industry see lower prices ahead and not the standard fare annual returns of 8% to 10%.
Source: Bloomberg
To me, with the S&P 500 now trading about 18 times 2023 forecast earnings per share and a possible first-half economic contraction, that valuation is steep. To be fair, back at the October 13 low in stocks, a 16-forward multiple might have seemed more reasonable.
Source: Yardeni Research
Even then, though, with high-grade corporate bonds yielding above 5.8%, up more than 350 basis points from a year earlier, a 16 P/E did not seem all that cheap either. It’s important to understand that the discount rate applied to future corporate profits is often a weighted-average cost of capital that includes debt, equity, and (to a lesser extent) the yield of preferred shares.
The yield on investment-grade corporate bonds is a good proxy of the debt piece in many instances. So, by basic math, when discounting future cash flows, an 18 P/E on U.S. large caps with intermediate-term corporate debt rates still above 5%, the S&P 500 does not appear to be a big bargain in my eye.
Also concerning on the investment front, as we head into 2023, is the reality that bonds are not hedging stocks anymore. For about 25 years, when stocks zigged, bonds zagged, helping to reduce the overall volatility of a classic 60/40 stock/bond portfolio. In the last several quarters, however, the correlation has flipped positive.
Here’s where I have some good news when assessing yields today; even though equities and Treasuries might be positively correlated, that doesn’t mean you should dismiss bonds. Think of it like this: If your stock allocation is down 20% in the next year, but your fixed-income sleeve is down 1%, the two are technically positively correlated, but bonds indeed helped you weather the equity storm. With positive real yields across the term structure of Treasuries, I assert they still have a place for risk-conscious investors.
Source: Bank of America Global Research
While not any more valuable than your guess, I happen to agree with Wall Street forecasters’ somewhat bleak view of where the S&P 500 will be at the end of 2023. There’s still opportunity, though. Bonds should offer better real returns and if we see the usual earnings recovery in 2024, the next 12 months should feature some very attractive long-term entry points for equity investors.
Disclaimer: Mike Zaccardi does not own any of the securities mentioned in this article.
This will be a huge week for markets, with an FOMC meeting, a slew of economic data points, and a big week in earnings. The show stopper will be the FOMC meeting, where the Fed is...
After 6%, 9%, and 12% run-up moves in the S&P 500, Small Caps, and the Nasdaq 100, respectively, the most important question is, “Does this positive market continue? Are we in for...
Friday was a clear victory for the Nasdaq Composite Index with a breakout to go along with higher volume accumulation and a close above the 200-day MA. Nasdaq technicals retained...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.