

Please try another search
Many Street analysts consider the iShares South Korea ETF (NYSE:EWY) as a proxy for the health of global technology, the semiconductor sector, the chip sector, and perhaps the retail electronics sector as well.
One look at my weekly chart of EWY shows that it has been in the grasp of a major correction or possibly even bear phase since its January all-time high at 79.07 into Tuesday's low at 56.34, a near 30% decline. This decline has retraced two-thirds of of the entire prior advance from the August 2015 low at 42.94 to the January 2018 high at 79.07. One could think that the ugly EWY performance reflected deteriorating relations with North Korea, but, ironically, relations have not been so promising since 1950!
From a macro perspective, we could conclude simply that the tariff spat between the U.S. and China that might be responsible for the implosion of the China equity market has spilled over into the Korean market. Then again, perhaps EWY weakness argues that the global economy is sluggish-to-weak, that demand for gadgets is down or declining precipitously, or that there is an oversupply of chips and gadgets, etc. The question is whether or not the worst is behind EWY, because if that IS the case, then more than likely VanEck Vectors Semiconductor (NYSE:SMH), Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1 (NASDAQ:QQQ), and perhaps FAANG are nearing their corrective lows?
From a technical perspective, EWY is probing very important support at the 57.00 level, which represents the Fibonacci 62% retrace plateau of the 2015 to 2018 advance. As such, EWY needs to contain further selling pressure to avert additional weakness that points to a test of 53.60 (blue support line on the attached chart), if not considerably lower because often a break of the 62% corrective support zone triggers a total give-back of the previous advance.
For EWY to get some upside traction, and to trigger the most preliminary of upside reversal signals, it needs to climb and close above 59.25. Let's keep an eye on it as a proxy for other technology-related index ETFs.
Investors were net sellers of fund assets (including those of conventional funds and ETFs) for the first week in six, redeeming a net $2.1 billion for the LSEG Lipper fund-flows...
During Refinitiv Lipper’s fund-flows week that ended May 24, 2023, investors were overall net purchasers of fund assets (including both conventional funds and ETFs) for the sixth...
Following an aggressive interest rate hiking cycle throughout 2022 and 2023, cracks began appearing in the U.S. banking sector by March, disproportionately affecting smaller...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.