Breaking News
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

EOS Mainnet Launch Stalls Raising Security Concerns

By (Tanzeel Akhtar/ 14, 2018 06:10AM ET
EOS Mainnet Launch Stalls Raising Security Concerns
By (Tanzeel Akhtar/   |  Jun 14, 2018 06:10AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items

The highly anticipated EOS mainnet launch that was at first scheduled for June 2, then pushed to June 10 has now officially stalled, leaving EOS tokens in limbo. The alt-coin created by, a Cayman Islands-based company and released mid-2017, currently exists on the Ethereum platform; the launch will allow it to move to its own main network.

The standstill, described by many as chaotic, is a result of the complexity of the process which requires existing token holders to vote to elect 21 EOS block producers (BPs) who would essentially mine the currency. But the voting process requires a minimum 15% of voter weigh-in before anything can go forward. Currently only 9.9% of EOS account holders have voted.

Though released version 1.0 of the EOS software, thereby technically launching the mainnet, without approval from 15% of its stakeholders, EOS is not officially live, leaving the alt-currency vulnerable to attack. EOS tokens are now frozen, as voting continues.

EOS/USD 60 Minute Chart
EOS/USD 60 Minute Chart

The digital currency is currently the fifth largest cryptocurrency by market cap. Its price has plummeted over the past week. Down 24.79% at time of writing.

Vulnerable and Open to Attack

When transiting blockchains there are a number of security risks at play. In this particular case, a critical risk is low number of block producers (21), which could open the way for an attack. While node security risks are not unique to EOS, when a system only has 21 centralized nodes, the network is, by its very nature, more susceptible to manipulation. Brendan Playford, CEO of Constellation points out that the EOS model sacrifices the dream of decentralization at the altar of scalability.

The small number of producers is a blatant concern. “I understand from various sources that the main plan was that 21 block producers are to be appointed," says Roni Baibochaev, founder of CryptoXchange. That's highly risky he explains, and increases the possibility of a 51% attack. On the other hand, he says, "it does make sense to minimize the risk of having too many BPs which might slow scalability. The EOS team will sooner or later have to decide if it’s worth the risk."

But Baibochaev doesn't see any of this as deep rooted or unsolvable:

“The main question is whether the challenges that EOS is now facing are temporary and if they can be avoided, so they're not long-lasting. True, the main network launch didn’t go according to plan. Hence EOS has to make sure that it will achieve its goals on a longer term perspective.”

Lack of Transparency Adds to Complexity

Estefano Elhawary co-founder of Block Stocks sees additional risks, some having to do with lack of transparency rather than technological issues that come with transiting blockchains, in this case EOS migrating off Ethereum. Since such a small number of EOS holders have thus far voted for block producers, Elhawary sees this as a failure on the part of EOS for not stressing the vote's importance, which would have provided a better user experience.

“The problem is the sheer amount of education required: from explaining why EOS is currently on Ethereum’s chain but moving to a new one, to showing users how to register their new tokens (across a variety of different channels), to integrating with exchanges to be able to support the swap, to getting users to interact on the new chain, etc. It’s a lot of information to digest and communicate for a topic that has a lot of complexity.”

It makes you wonder how EOS was able to raise $4B in their ICO, notes Elhawary, yet they couldn’t muster up a $10-100K budget in order to facilitate the stakeholder vote.

Learning From Past Failures

The crypto industry has seen many great initiatives fail early on, says Mati Greenspan, senior market analyst at eToro, often due to fatal security flaws. This includes the very first initial coin offering which was known as the DAO project, which raised $150 million. But in mid-2016 a hacker discovered a loophole in the code, which allowed him to siphon off about $70 million worth of Ethereum, which at that time amounted to 3.6 million tokens.

“EOS is a bit more centralized, both in token distribution and in governance," points out Greenspan, "and it's very well funded. All of which should help the team get to a stable launch eventually. As an investor, I'm not worried about any short-term delay and understand that they're doing the best to get this massive project off the ground as smoothly as possible.”

Greenspan compares the EOS stall to an airplane as it's about to take-off.

"Imagine you're on a plane before takeoff and the captain comes on the PA system to inform you there are some technical difficulties. The reaction from most rational passengers is actually one of relief as it is clear the professionals have identified the issue and will not take off without being absolutely certain it's fixed. In this case, the passengers are being asked to vote on who should be the pilot and crew in a new high tech system that is neither user-friendly nor proven to be secure. So the voting process may take some additional time to work out as well.”

Nicolas Gilot, co-CEO of blockchain-powered gaming distribution platform Ultra, agrees there are positives despite facing difficulties with the launch of EOS. Unlike many he compliments the open source blockchain protocol developer, calling its handling of EOS “refreshing and promising” because the communication between chains could be a big improvement for scalability. In Gilot's view the fact that EOS will have 21 block producers is part of what make this blockchain unique.

EOS Mainnet Launch Stalls Raising Security Concerns

Related Articles

EOS Mainnet Launch Stalls Raising Security Concerns

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (2)
mohsen kalhori
mohsen kalhori Jun 15, 2018 3:20AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Erik Osinga
Erik Osinga Jun 14, 2018 11:56AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I am not sure what the point is of EOS.  Database are much faster and much more flexible.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email