

Please try another search
The Dogechain team denies any funds were lost despite "unwarranted minting."
Dogechain halted transactions this weekend after developers detected a critical bug in the project’s bridge contracts.
Dogechain was at risk of an exploit this weekend.
The project’s developers found a bug on Sept. 10 and paused block creation for several hours. On Sept. 11, the development team said the network was again live with ongoing maintenance.
The bug could have allowed attackers to freely mint wrapped DOGE (wDOGE) on the bridge network.
The project said that its network currently runs on a Proof-of-Authority (PoA) consensus mechanism that allowed the team to reverse the “unwarranted minting of wDOGE.” It added that it would remain under PoA until the team is fully prepared to transition to Proof-of-State (PoS) consensus.
Dogechain noted that the issue concerned an “internal bug” rather than “an exploit or hack.” The team assured the public that no Dogecoin (DOGE) had been lost or stolen. It added that no “internal funds” had been lost either—presumably referring to Dogechain (DC) and wrapped Doge (wDOGE) tokens.
However, some sources argue that Dogechain did indeed lose funds. Independent crypto researcher Crumbs suggested that an attacker exploited the vulnerability to mint 9.7 million wDOGE ($600,000). The supposed attacker converted as much as $316,000 to other assets; a portion of those funds may have been deposited to Binance.
Dogechain contributor Roc Zacharias responded to Crumbs and denied the theft, stating that the project “had [an] internal bug [and] no hack.” He continued,
“No funds lost. Nothing bridged out [or] lost like you’ve suggested here.”
Despite those denials, it appears that an Ethereum address beginning with 0x78F05… has been specifically blacklisted by Dogechain. Additionally, Dogechain’s official account of events implies that funds were minted without warrant at one point, even though those mints were reversed.
Those facts do not confirm that an attacker successfully committed theft. However, it does seem that an individual performed transactions that could have led to a loss of funds.
It should be emphasized that the vulnerability affects Dogechain, not Dogecoin. The two projects have no official relationship. Dogechain aims to build a Layer 2 network that allows bridged Dogecoin tokens to be used on new applications such as decentralized exchanges and NFT marketplaces.
Furthermore, the vulnerability described above is entirely unrelated to a data leak that recently affected the Shiba Inu token, another popular doge-themed blockchain project.
Intriguing developments are unfolding in the global financial markets, and a clear polarisation is materializing among investors. On one hand, there are investors looking to take...
Bitcoin concludes November on a high, continuing its two-month upward trend, reaching the upper band of the rising channel, and encountering resistance around $38,000. The critical...
The Bitcoin price has continued to move in a sideways pattern for the past number of days, and this is despite the fact that we have seen the Fed dialing down their hawkish tone by...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.