Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Commodities' Champ Natural Gas Could See A More Difficult 2019

Published 11/29/2018, 03:18 AM
Updated 09/02/2020, 02:05 AM

Natural gas's ranking as the No. 1 commodity of 2018 looks sealed. But each new week of the cold season is raising the bar for the level of heating demand the market has to meet. Each shortcoming could punish gas prices in the new year, especially if production of the fuel remains at record highs like now and market liquidity dries up like it has in crude oil.

Natural Gas Weekly Chart

At its Wednesday settlement of $4.70 for a million metric British thermal units (mmBtu) on the New York Mercantile Exchange, natural gas returned almost 60 percent to the investor who bought at the end of 2017 and held since. The next-best performing commodity for the year is oats, which shows a gain of just 23 percent (desktop users, click here and go to “performance” to see all commodity returns).

For gas to maintain its huge payout and stay at the $4 per mmBtu sweet spot, weekly draw numbers of the fuel from storage to help electricity generators meet heating demand are key. If those don’t come in line with expectations, then double-digit market swings could become the norm. Thinning market participation is already exacerbating volatility, causing daily moves of up to 19 percent lately.

'Cold December' Far From A Certainty

Scott Shelton, energy futures broker with ICAP in Durham, North Carolina, says the gas market’s biggest challenge might be that “a cold December is far from a certainty”.

Writing in his daily note, Shelton said:

“Anything can happen to Q1 2019 NatGas. I keep thinking about the crude market where prices move 2-3 percent daily for little reason and think that this also probable in NatGas for the time being as the market digests the prospects for December weather and salt storage.”

The first cold season gas draw of 2018/19 resulted in a pull of 134 billion cubic feet (bcf) from underground salt caverns during the week ending November 16, data from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) showed.

That was the earliest triple-digit gas storage decrease for the month of November, according to federal energy data going back to 1994. The huge jump in gas demand that week overwhelmed analysts, who had been expecting a withdrawal of just around 109 bcf.

Demand Expectations Higher After Recent Draw

But the additional 25 bcf draw, coming after the so-called Alaskan Ridge weather phenomenon that caused one of the coldest pre-winter weeks in the US Northeast—which serves as a bastion for gas-powered heating—may have brought its own pricing problems.

That’s because the EIA’s next gas supply-demand reading, due at 10:30 AM ET (15:30 GMT) today and meant for the week ending November 23, is expected to show a pull of just 77 bcf by analysts estimates. While double the demand for gas seen during the same week a year ago, the next data will make up just over half of the previous 134-bcf draw.

Historically, temperatures from last week were lower than those from a year ago and a three-decade average. According to Reuters, there were 160 heating degree days (HDDs) for last week, versus 131 HDDs the same week a year ago and a 30-year average of 128 HDDs for the period. HDDs measure the number of degrees a day's average temperature is below 65 degrees Fahrenheit (18 degrees Celsius). The measure is used to estimate demand to heat homes and businesses.

Yet on a week-to-week basis, weather for the week ended November 23 was milder than that for the November 16 week.

Mixed Weather, Strong Production

Dan Myers, gas analyst at Gelber & Associates in Houston, expects last week’s draw from storage to be

“hampered by lower demand over the Thanksgiving weekend, mixed weather, and stronger production”.

Stronger production has, in fact, been a running theme in gas throughout this year.

The EIA expects production of dry natural gas to average an all-time high 83.2 bcf per day in 2018, and climb further to 89.6 bcf per day next year.

Large volumes of gas, sourced from primary drilling and also obtained in secondary form during drilling for shale crude, have led to record production of the fuel.

Bottom Line: 'Expect The Unexpected'

Despite such overwhelming output, storage levels of gas never reached the danger of overfilling, thanks to strong summer heat and, now, early cold that kept air-conditioners and heaters on overdrive.

If last week’s estimated 77-bcf draw comes through, it would leave storage at 3.036 trillion cubic feet (tcf), the lowest for this time of year since 2000. That would also be 18 percent below the same week a year ago and about 20 percent below the five-year average.

But if there are more freezes in the near-term, then triple-digit draws could be the norm rather than exception.

Says ICAP’s Shelton:

“The bottom line is to expect the unexpected as liquidity is terrible, and any type of flow will have a much larger effect on the market.”

Latest comments

Thanks for analysis. You must take into account that Natural Gas is a fairly local market, ie there is a lot of natural gas produced in Texas and Oklahoma that is ”associated” gas with limited market access, and with current WTI, it’s fair to assume that this productionSo the production argument of your’s does not tell the story. Also, don’t forget about liquefaction capacity, it has almost doubled by Q1’19, and coal-fired plants switching to natural gas.
, yes, I'm aware of the below-normal storage levels, which you'll notice are cited in my copy too.. . Also, I get what you're saying about my old-fashioned approach to dice-tossing on gas. But hey, that's what the market is still using and seems most comfortable with. If you'll notice, this entire analysis is based off ICAP and Gelber prognosis, aside from EIA data. I expect these guys to know what they're writing for their clients.. . But I'm also happy to quote you if you wish to comment in the future as an independent trader.. . At Investing.com, we don't discriminate, so long as your views are sensible and help the story.. . Thanks for connecting and commenting.
I’m not a trader, and I don’t wish to be quoted! Just a believer in nat gas prices and nat gas producers, after years and years of distress, and simply, too cheap gas. I think that the market is doing what it has always done, assuming a super-drop after the winter, but fundamentals have changed, gradually, but it has and it continues to. Power companies used to switch to coal during high season, we are seeing that less and less. Rising interest rates, shale producers may need to focus more cash flow on repaying debt rather than growth. The banks and researchers change their 12-24 month prognosis every 3 months, after the price “move” has happened! Best regards
 , again truly appreciate your intent, feedback and time you've spent on this discourse with me.. . If anything, I value the diversity of the views out there and your opinions for sure.. . Although you may not wish to go on record, I'd like to continue receiving your thoughts on the gas market. As I said, we're for anything that'll help us write a better story.. . I'll reach to you personally with my email so that we can continue this conversation.. . Thanks again and bests.. . - B
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.