Breaking News
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Are Investors About To Be Burned By Recency Bias?

By Boris SchlossbergMarket OverviewMay 05, 2021 09:10AM ET
Are Investors About To Be Burned By Recency Bias?
By Boris Schlossberg   |  May 05, 2021 09:10AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items

That’s the argument of Chris Cole of Artemis Capital in a very interesting Odd Lots podcast with Tracy Alloway.

Data points flash warning for the market

We’ve noted that recent valuation data suggests the market is vulnerable to a pullback, as such, basic measures as GDP to market cap, trailing 12-month P/E and record ratio of Leveraged ETFs all point to possible correction.

The fact that equities have failed to make further upside progress after blow out earrings from mega-cap technology companies only adds to the thesis that markets are ripe for a pullback.

Were the past 40 years an anomaly?

Chris Cole’s outlook, however, is far longer than just the next quarter. His goal is to establish a portfolio that could perform well over 100 years and his primary thesis is that the last 40 years of investing have been an unusually favorable anomaly that has lulled investors into a false sense of security.

Cole notes that fully 91% of all gains over the past century from the 60/40 portfolio have come in just 22 years from 1984-2007. That period which we can call the Boomer Golden Era was the beneficiary of many favorable trends.

First and foremost was the gargantuan decline of interest rates from 17% to 0% which resulted in everything from cheap capital to higher valuations for equities to multi-year gains for fixed income assets.

The second factor that helped assets was the massive demographic bulge of boomers entering the workforce and creating household formation all of which was very positive for assets as well.

The third factor that was a massive boon for assets was globalization, and specifically, the rise of China, which created an inexorable downward force on prices as manufacturing became incredibly efficient.

Lastly, the past 40 years saw a significant decline in US tax rates with rates hitting 100- year lows as capital became highly favored to labor.


Why many favorable trends may reverse

Every one of those forces is now beginning to move the other way. Granted this may be a multi-year transition process, but it stands to reason that rates, which have reached the zero bound, have little room to decline further and may begin to creep higher.

The demographic picture has also turned negative as there are more 60-year-olds than 6-year-olds in the US now and that trend will only accelerate given the demographic shifts and the anti-immigration policy of the country. 

On the globalization front, the current tensions between the US and China will likely persist as the two countries will compete for both power resources, possibly reversing the long-term trends of declining prices for manufactured goods. The one counterargument to this thesis is that technology, in the form or robotics, AI and bio-engineering, may make such rapid productivity gains that it would wholly offset all of the negative trends that are arising now.

Generally, however, adoption takes much longer than imagined. The 1930’s were a fount of innovation in transportation technologies, but true adoption did not take place until the 1950’s. Similarly, the 1970’s were the time when many of the communication breakthroughs occurred, but again, adoption took several decades to fully permeate the economy.

Undoubtedly the present-day adoption curves are faster, but not extraordinarily so. One only needs to look at the putrid pace of digital payments adoption in the US to see how behavior lags technology by decades.

In any case, Cole’s argument is not conditioned on the positive or negative scenarios for financial assets, but rather on a novel way to construct a portfolio that is not based on the concept of asset diversification. We’ll take a look tomorrow at exactly what he proposes.  

Are Investors About To Be Burned By Recency Bias?

Related Articles

Marc Chandler
FOMC: Words Not Actions By Marc Chandler - Jun 14, 2021 1

The Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee meeting is the most important event in the week ahead. It is not that it will take fresh policy action. Rather, its observations about...

Chris Markoch
How To Profit From Value Investing By Chris Markoch  - Jun 14, 2021

Simply put, value investing is an investment strategy in which investors look to buy stocks that are on sale. However, that is an oversimplification. Value investors are looking...

Are Investors About To Be Burned By Recency Bias?

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email