Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Apple Believes Cheaper IPhones Will Be More Popular

Published 06/17/2018, 01:49 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

The news out on Friday that Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) will focus more on the cheaper LCD (liquid-crystal displays) than the more expensive OLED (organic light-emitting diode) screens in its fall rollout of phones illustrates that even Apple consumers have finally balked at $1,000 phones. The IPhone X release this past year was the first Apple IPhone with the OLED screens, and it obviously hasn't sold well, or Apple wouldn't be offering the majority of their product mix this fall with the cheaper LCD screens.

However, this points to another problem for Apple: Samsung Galaxy phones have had the better OLED screens for over 7 years, and with a much more competitive price even at the high end of the market. In short, Apple cannot make an OLED-screen phone for the $700- $800 max threshold that consumers seem willing to pay for a phone, even a high-end smartphone.

This is the problem with Apple products in general, when you compare Apple to the competition, even at the high end for laptops, smartphones or tablets you pay much more for less product specs. It isn't even style differences anymore as high-end lightweight laptops have all morphed into the same sleek design architecture, but you will pay $1000 more for an Apple laptop with far less specs than the top of the line laptops on the market. Apple has marketed themselves as the high end status brand in the market, but the flop of the IPhone X illustrates that even Apple fans have their limits to brand versus price considerations. 1,000 dollars for a smartphone has proven to be too much for consumers, regardless of the logo on the device.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

We have seen this economics lesson play out at the pump with gasoline prices, as consumers seem to have real problems with $4 a gallon gasoline prices, which starts changing behavior in the market from driving patterns to automobile purchases. Thus, it appears that $1,000 for smartphones is the equivalent to $4 a gallon gas prices, and weakening demand starts to gain traction in the market.

The real question for Apple is why they cannot make an OLED smartphone for the same price as Samsung at the high end? It just finally illustrates once and for all that Apple products are overpriced, and Apple IPhones are inferior products to Samsung smartphones at the high end. Samsung makes a better quality smartphone with better product specs at the high end, and does it for a cheaper price.

There is also talk that Apple will offer some IPhones priced in the $550 and $650 range going forward, and indicates what we have been saying all along, that the next strategic advantage in the ever maturing smartphone market will be price! As a technology becomes mature, fully commoditized, with little product differentiation, the price wars begin, and prices and margins start coming down in a definable category trend. The next front for market share wars at the high end will be price: who can offer the same commoditized smartphone features at the best price?

The other thing I noticed in the Apple news on Friday was that since the fall models will not be a major new product refresh, Apple is offering a bunch of slightly different, cluster of incremental IPhone upgrades that is highly cannibalizing and confusing for the IPhone brand in general. This strategy has been trending for apple with the last 3 generations or so of the IPhone, and seems to finally be hitting the ridiculous stage. This seems a little like a company in desperation mode trying to squeeze a little more juice from the dried up marketing lemon, because they really don't have much new to offer on the creative and engineering side of the equation for the next IPhone upgrade!
Apple Bar Chart
This again points to the commoditization and mature market nature for smartphones in general, and why consumers don't need to go and upgrade for the next smartphone every year, two years, or even three years. Consumers will hold on to their smartphones longer as the new upgrades offer very little premium upgrade value over existing smartphones given the price factor for a new high-end smartphone of $800-$1,000. If you want to sell the equivalent number of smartphones as in the past, Apple, you'd better start lowering the price. Otherwise, you can keep the same high prices, and just sell a lot fewer phones going forward.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Remember all the hype by analysts and investors regarding this new anniversary release of the IPhone - it was going to be a real game changer. Frankly, it has been underwhelming to say the least. And it illustrates that even Apple consumers are price sensitive in the end!

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.