Breaking News
0

An Economic Analysis Of ICO Investments: ClearCoin Vs. Shardcoin

By James MasonCryptocurrencyApr 18, 2018 06:41PM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/an-economic-analysis-of-ico-investments-clearcoin-vs-shardcoin-200306697
An Economic Analysis Of ICO Investments: ClearCoin Vs. Shardcoin
By James Mason   |  Apr 18, 2018 06:41PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

As the hottest innovation in the financial markets for years, Initial Coin Offerings (or ICO’s) saw a huge upswing in popularity during 2017. Everyone wants to get on the investment train, however, the underlying economics behind these offerings can be hazy. The hope is that once the ICO stage is completed, the underlying business will list its tokens on an exchange, thereby opening up the market to new participants and increasing the liquidity of the underlying token. In theory, this should increase prices past that of the initial offerings, allowing early token buyers to unload their holdings at a profit.

Indeed, for the last months, this has proven to be exactly the course many of these new ICO’s take. However, as time goes on the ongoing success of these investments will increasingly lie with the underlying token economics.

Everyone understands that the appreciation of any given token is dependent upon the underlying business. It is simply prudent investing to examine the strength of the business case and the financial stability of the offering party. However, just as critical to the appreciation of the tokens is sound token economics.

Over the past months, there has been a growing trend for ICO’s to offer so called “utility tokens”. Obviously, these tokens must play some critical roll in the ecosystem for appreciation to occur. Furthermore, in order to pair the appreciation of these tokens with the success of the underlying business, a two primary conditions must be met.

For one, the emission of the utility tokens must be capped so as not to expand with the user base of the company. If supply of the tokens grows along with the company, then while the company could increase revenue, the tokens may not increase in value. In this case, the ultimate appreciation or depreciation of the tokens would remain undetermined and would be dependent upon the relative increase in demand versus supply of the tokens. Thus, a good ICO investment should be capped in supply of the tokens. That way, an increase in demand for the company should lead to a corresponding increase in price of the tokens.

In addition, the suppliers of the goods or services (the “utility”) must be willing to accept the coin. This is an important consideration when making any investment.

Consider for example ClearCoin. This startup hopes to provide advertising services for clients in return for its proprietary utility token. It’s emission is capped, however, in this case, the providers of the services will be third party advertisers. While the demand side for advertisements may be tangible, it is highly doubtful that conventional websites and publications would be willing to supply advertisement space in exchange for ClearCoin, a hitherto illiquid crypto token. This is because these are conventional companies who are not initiated into the crypto space.

This structure contrasts with Shardix, another recently launched ICO with capped supply. Shardix provides decentralized database services wherein database miners provide storage space to consumers. In this case, Shardcoin (a utility token) is used to transact between the two sides of the network. However, here, in contrast to ClearCoin, the suppliers would be much more willing to accept the cryptocurrency payment. Miners would be of the same form as any other miner in the crypto space and would be providing a more homogenized product- here storage space instead of unique advertisements. Thus, both sides of the network should be willing to transact with the underlying utility token. As such, Shardcoin, fulfilling both requirements, emission and transaction, would be likely to appreciate in conjunction with the success of the underlying company.

In the end, no ICO is a sure bet. However, by applying sound economic analysis, you can narrow down the list. That way, you can spend your time on the underlying company- just like any other investment.

An Economic Analysis Of ICO Investments: ClearCoin Vs. Shardcoin
 

Related Articles

An Economic Analysis Of ICO Investments: ClearCoin Vs. Shardcoin

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email