Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Cyber Monday Extended SALE: Up to 60% OFF InvestingPro+ CLAIM OFFER

Alibaba Stock Is Still Too Risky To Own

By Vince MartinStock MarketsApr 04, 2022 07:33AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/alibaba-stock-is-still-too-risky-to-own-200621452
Alibaba Stock Is Still Too Risky To Own
By Vince Martin   |  Apr 04, 2022 07:33AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
 
TCEHY
+2.49%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
BABA
+1.03%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
PDD
-1.01%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
DIDIY
+3.68%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

This article was written exclusively for Investing.com

On Oct. 27, 2020, Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) stock closed at an all-time high of $317.14. On Mar. 15 of this year, BABA stock ended the trading session just above $73.

BABA Weekly
BABA Weekly

In less than 17 months, shares incredibly lost more than three-quarters of their value. In the process, Alibaba shed more than $600 billion in market capitalization—a figure greater than the entire market values of all but eight companies listed in the US.

The simple narrative surrounding the extraordinary plunge is that US investors have been scared off by regulatory movements, both at home and in China.

There's some truth to that narrative, certainly. But it's not the entire truth.

Concerns about Alibaba stock center on the Alibaba business as well. And given that the regulatory risks remain elevated, there is a case that trying to time the bottom in BABA stock, or owning the stock at all, is still too risky a trade.

The Long Plunge In Alibaba Stock

Regulatory fears absolutely are a key catalyst in the long decline in Alibaba stock. It's not a coincidence that the sell-off began just days before regulators took a big swipe at Alibaba.

In late October of 2020, Ant Group, of which Alibaba owned (and still owns) 33%, announced plans for its initial public offering. When the deal was priced, it was set to be the largest IPO in history. The listing promised to set a value on one of Alibaba's most valuable investments—which would, based on public market listings, be worth at least $100 billion—while also bringing in capital for growth.

But the next week, the Chinese government suspended the IPO. (Ant still hasn't gone public). BABA stock fell 8% on the news, and the pressure from both the central government and investors was just beginning.

At the end of 2020, regulators launched an antitrust investigation into Alibaba. That investigation resulted in a $2.75 billion fine—and hopes that the worst was over.

It wasn't. More regulatory movements in April threatened Ant Group's very business model. Regulatory pressure on other giants, including Tencent (OTC:TCEHY) and Didi Global (NYSE:DIDI), continued. The new five-year plan from China's ruling Communist Party, released in August, contemplated far heavier regulation on private industry, notably tech giants like Alibaba.

On top of all of the problems at home, Alibaba now faces pressure at home. The US Securities and Exchange Commission is moving forward with plans to have Chinese companies delisted if they don't comply with audit requirements. Alibaba simply is getting squeezed from all directions.

New Risks, Same As The Old Ones

The risks posed by these developments, and others, can't simply be waved away. They pose an existential threat to Alibaba's business—and to its investors.

But from a broader standpoint, not all that much really has changed. Regulatory risks have been front and center—or at least should have been front and center—since Alibaba's own 2014 IPO. This is the largest company in a country still led by a single-party, Communist government (no matter how often that government at least feigns interest in capitalism).

Investors in the US don't even actually own shares in Alibaba itself. Rather, as detailed in the company's Form 20-F (its annual report filed with the US SEC), BABA stock represents a stake in a so-called variable interest entity, or VIE, which ostensibly in turn is entitled to ownership of Alibaba profits. The Alibaba VIE is based in the Cayman Islands, potentially limiting any claim US investors might have against Alibaba itself should the company act in ways contrary to US shareholder interests.

Given that many experts have argued that VIEs are in violation of Chinese law, these kinds of risks have been present from the jump. At any point, Chinese (or US) government officials had the ability to inflict precisely this kind of pain on Alibaba shareholders.

Not Just Regulators

Admittedly, from a fundamental perspective, BABA stock does look cheap. Shares trade at just over 13x the consensus earnings per share estimate for fiscal 2022 (ending March). That's a low multiple for a company that's still growing revenue, and still has longer-term opportunities outside China and in end markets like cloud and even electric vehicles.

But that headline multiple obscures real fundamental problems as well. After the fiscal second quarter report in November, Alibaba slashed its revenue outlook for the year. That decelerating growth is coming alongside higher spending: the FY2022 EPS estimate for this year suggests an 18% decline year-over-year.

The core problem on both fronts is that competition is increasing. Pinduoduo (NASDAQ:PDD) is winning in rural areas and smaller cities, even surpassing Alibaba in the total number of annual active users.

Those fundamental problems alone don't support the roughly two-thirds decline in BABA stock from 2020 highs to the current price. But they're a contributing factor. The sell-off isn't just about regulatory risks.

The Case For Caution

To be sure, all is not lost for Alibaba. The business remains a powerhouse even as rivals successfully play catch-up. The Chinese central government probably doesn't want one of its flagship businesses shut out of US markets; the SEC and other US agencies don't want US investors taking billions of dollars in additional losses. There's probably room for some kind of compromise; the Alibaba story doesn't have to end in a forced breakup, a delisting, or another catastrophic outcome.

But that doesn't mean BABA stock is a buy, particularly with the 50% bounce off the lows. Regulatory risks aren't going anywhere, and for the time being the fundamental concerns are not either. And there's a real problem with focusing on the fundamentals when those fundamentals literally apply to a different company. A stock price—any stock price—should in theory be equal to the total value of future cash flows, discounted for time. Investors in Alibaba have minimal assurance that they will ever receive those cash flows.

The sell-off so far has been extraordinary, but it is for the most part explainable by real factors, not simply a panicky market overreacting to unlikely outcomes. As long as Alibaba stock represents ownership in a VIE, not a country; as long as the Chinese central government remains Communist; as long as US-China tensions remain elevated; BABA is going to be a high-risk play. With fundamental concerns undercutting the potential rewards, it's difficult to take on those risks.

Alibaba Stock Is Still Too Risky To Own
 

Related Articles

Lance Roberts
S&P 500: Bull Case Has 2 Problems By Lance Roberts - Dec 06, 2022 8

Since the beginning of October, the market has performed better as a “Fed Pivot” bull case pushed investors into the market. We previously laid out the case for a...

Alibaba Stock Is Still Too Risky To Own

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (9)
Aldo Elam Majiah
Aldo Elam Majiah Apr 12, 2022 6:02PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
obviously written by people who never stay in China for a long time
Magnus Nordzell
Magnus Nordzell Apr 04, 2022 12:45PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The delisting in the US won’t happen. The labour force in China is projected to shrink in the distant future and with this it’s current account surplus meaning that China will be dependent on foreign capital to grow its economy. Enabling Chinese companies to list overseas and access US capital markets is thus a key strategic objective for the CCP. Hence the recent announcement by the CSRC to allow foreign audit oversight bodies full access to domestic audit companies’ working papers should come as no surprise. As for the fundamentals yes there are challenges but the company is still growing revenues, especially in the fast-growing Cloud computing segment where it has a 40% market share, and it still generates about USD 20 billion in free cash flow annually that can be used to extend share repurchase programs. As for the VIE structure I expect this to change in the future as demonstrated recently by another Chinese company, Uxin.
Pinco Pallino
Tether Apr 04, 2022 12:24PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Communist china! Well, well, But of the blocking of funds implemented by visa and mastercard. Against whom does he have a different view from the ruling power? Doesn't it scare anyone? This should terrify any democratic individual. Bleating sheep
Alberello Mac
Alberello Mac Apr 04, 2022 12:01PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Here we go more FUD... The most epic one was the capitulation day on March 14 when the JPMorgan call "China sector ‘uninvestable’. What a bunch of criminal this banks. BABA is UP 50% since then.
Patrik Marx
Patrik Marx Apr 04, 2022 11:58AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Im in short Position. One piece, no leverage.
John Lakran
John Lakran Apr 04, 2022 11:58AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Good Luck I'm betting we end the year above $200.
Xin Zhang
Xin Zhang Apr 04, 2022 11:56AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
After a while, I feel bored with such writers on this website and seeking alpha, they do not really know a s hit. Most of them can talk about some very common opinions for several pages, and none of them can provide any data to support them. I bought BABA at a recent dip, I do not think any of these issues is going to undermine BABA in a long run, especially competition from PDD.
Mikal Allen
Mikal Allen Apr 04, 2022 11:52AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Fud article lol go buy another stock at the top!
ZS Beck
ZS Beck Apr 04, 2022 9:05AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Any Chinese stock is a risky buy. I don't own any, when the Chinese government can decide any day, for a crackdown, delisting, etc.
Robert Egart
Robert Egart Apr 04, 2022 9:05AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Any US based company can drop 50% in a week on one bad news article. Risk is everywhere not just in China. Check out Blue Chip Paypal.
ZS Beck
ZS Beck Apr 04, 2022 9:05AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The difference is fundamentals and not cooked numbers.
Taska Luwenskie
Taska Luwenskie Apr 04, 2022 9:05AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The delisting risk comes from the US government though.
Robert Egart
Robert Egart Apr 04, 2022 8:36AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Thanks for your advice on BABA not being a buy. You were just off by a 50% gain. Not bad. lol
Meru Pet
Meru Pet Apr 04, 2022 8:36AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
you are a smart one: you always buy at the lowest price. not at 300, not at 200, not at 150...
Robert Egart
Robert Egart Apr 04, 2022 8:36AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Saying it isn't a buy at near all time lows with 2 billion customers is so smart though.
Meru Pet
Meru Pet Apr 04, 2022 8:36AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
oh you know, when it is lowest point ?
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email