Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

21 Lowest And 21 Highest Cost US Large-Cap ETFs In The Current Expenses

By Richard ShawETFsMay 02, 2017 01:35AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/21-lowest-and-21-highest-cost-us-large-cap-etfs-in-the-current-expenses-200186440
21 Lowest And 21 Highest Cost US Large-Cap ETFs In The Current Expenses
By Richard Shaw   |  May 02, 2017 01:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

There is a price war going on among fund sponsors with some ETFs now having expense ratios from 3 basis points to 5 basis points.

Keeping costs low is key to long-term returns generally, and specifically to index funds.

Here is a list of the 21 lowest expense ratio and 21 highest expense ratio US large-cap ETFs that have at least $100 million of assets under management.

 21 Lowest And Highest Exp. Ratio Large Cap ETFs W/ ><div class=
$100M Assets" title=" 21 Lowest And Highest Exp. Ratio Large Cap ETFs W/ >$100M Assets" width="474" height="242">
The largest ETF (the S&P 500 tracker, SPY (NYSE:SPY)) is among the least expensive at 9 basis points, but more expensive than two other S&P 500 ETFs (ishares S&P 500 (NYSE:IVV) at 7 basis points, and Vanguard S&P 500 (NYSE:VOO) at 4 basis points).

For a $1 million position, 1 basis point amounts to $100 per year; or $200 extra return per year with IVV and $500 per year extra return with VOO.

If all you want to do is buy and hold the S&P 500, VOO probably is the most sensible approach. On the other hand, if you want to be able to sell covered options on your S&P 500 position for income, you need to stick with SPY.

Schwab has a US large-cap and a US broad market (also large-cap) ETF at 3 basis points.

Before you know it, some very large ETFs may have zero expense ratios — it could happen.

How so? Two things possibly:

  • Some sponsors may chose to offer “lead funds” such as a US large-cap fund at zero expense (operating at a loss) to gather assets on the assumption that if they can capture a core assets, they have a good shot at capturing other assets that are operated profitably — certainly that has been the case with money market funds for the past 8 years.
  • The combination of mega-size and revenue from securities lending should make is possible to operate at least marginally profitably on some funds to either gather assets, or compete to retain assets against others who lower fees to gather assets. When funds lend securities, they earn a fee, which is shared partially with the manager in most cases (not shared at Vanguard).

iShares, for example keeps from 15% to 28.5% of the securities lending revenue on it funds. If sponsors could live off of the lending revenue share alone, and also make certain competitive asset gathering or retention decisions, expense ratios on some funds could go to zero.

Here is some of what iShares published about securities lending by ETFs:


Q&A
Q&A

Whether sponsors do or do not keep a share of securities lending fees, as expense ratios approach zero (and 3 basis point to 5 basis point expense ratios are approaching zero in effect), the impact of securities lending begins to have a significant effect on the tracking error of an index fund — such that on occasion the fund could outperform its benchmark even with the drag of a management fee.

Other important factors that impact tracking error include the amount of cash held for liquidity; the effectiveness of sampling if index replication is not used; and the timeliness and accuracy of rebalancing and reconstitution.

Anyway, we are approaching the time where Warren Buffet’s concern about Wall Street drag on returns, and the damage to investors, may be approaching an end for large index funds. It is typically said that you cannot buy an index, only a fund tracking an index. Well, they two are approaching the point of being one and the same.

Overall, the highest costs US large-cap funds, with expense ratios from 48 to 64 basis points did not do worse than the lowest costs funds.

In fact if you simply average the returns (not asset weighted), the highest cost group did a little bit better than the lowest cost group. That was not due to better management, but to somewhat specialized large-cap strategies that did better, such as technology oriented NASDAQ exposures.

That shows that it is possible for higher fees to be justified in some cases by deviating from the broadest indexes, but that is a case-by-case situation.

If you are buying broad indexes, pay really close attention to expenses as one of the primary drivers. For specialized funds, category relative expenses can be important, but absolute expenses may not be as important as for broad index funds.

Securities Mentioned In This Article:

Schwab US Large-Cap (NYSE:SCHX), Schwab US Broad Market (NYSE:SCHB), VOO, Vanguard Total Stock Market (NYSE:VTI), iShares Core S&P Total US Stock Market (NYSE:ITOT), Vanguard Large-Cap (NYSE:VV), IVV, Vanguard Mega Cap (NYSE:MGC), Vanguard Dividend Appreciation (NYSE:VIG), SPY, Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity (NYSE:GSLC), Vanguard Growth (NYSE:VUG), Schwab US Large-Cap Growth (NYSE:SCHG), Vanguard Mega Cap Growth (NYSE:MGK), iShares Core US Growth (NYSE:IUSG), Vanguard Value (NYSE:VTV), Schwab US Dividend Equity (NYSE:SCHD), Schwab US Large-Cap Value (NYSE:SCHV), Vanguard Mega Cap Value (NYSE:MGV), Vanguard High Dividend Yield (NYSE:VYM), iShares Core US Value (NYSE:IUSV), First Trust Capital Strength (NASDAQ:FTCS), PowerShares International BuyBack Achievers (NASDAQ:IPKW), First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX (NASDAQ:FEX), Pacer Trendpilot 750 (NYSE:PTLC), iShares MSCI USA ESG Select (NYSE:KLD), iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social (NYSE:DSI), VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat (NYSE:MOAT), First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX (NASDAQ:FTC), First Trust NASDAQ-100 Ex-Technology Sector (NASDAQ:QQXT), First Trust NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted (NASDAQ:QQEW), First Trust US IPO (NYSE:FPX), PowerShares Dynamic Large Cap Growth (NYSE:PWB), First Trust Value Line Dividend (NYSE:FVD), Guggenheim Invest Defensive Equity (NYSE:DEF), First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX (NASDAQ:FTA), PowerShares Dynamic Large Cap Value (NYSE:PWV), Performant Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:PFMT), First Trust NASDAQ Rising Dividend Achievers (NASDAQ:RDVY), Oppenheimer Ultra Dividend Revenue (NYSE:RDIV), Oppenheimer Large Cap Revenue (NYSE:RWL), O’Shares FTSE US Quality Dividend (NYSE:OUSA)

21 Lowest And 21 Highest Cost US Large-Cap ETFs In The Current Expenses
 
Add a Comment

Related Articles

Tezcan Gecgil/Investing.com
2 ETFs Recently Converted From Mutual Funds By Tezcan Gecgil/Investing.com  - Dec 07, 2021 1

Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have been gaining popularity in recent years and as investors' appetite grows for these investment instruments, asset managers are converting more and...

Michele Schneider
3 Important Tips To Improve Trading This Coming Week By Michele Schneider - Dec 05, 2021

I have recently heard a saying stating that the current market behavior can lead to “death by a thousand cuts.” This is often the case in a choppy market where buyers and sellers...

Chris Vermeulen
Financial Sector ETF Pullback Sets Up A New $43.60 Upside Target By Chris Vermeulen - Nov 24, 2021 2

The recent downward price rotation in the Financial Select Sector SPDR® Fund (NYSE:XLF) ETF may have frightened some traders. My research, however, suggests this move is setting up...

21 Lowest And 21 Highest Cost US Large-Cap ETFs In The Current Expenses

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email