Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Singapore contempt of court bill seen suppressing freedom of speech

Published 08/12/2016, 02:44 AM
Updated 08/12/2016, 02:50 AM
© Reuters. K. Shanmugam, minister of foreign affairs of Singapore, addresses the 68th session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York

By Fathin Ungku

SINGAPORE (Reuters) - A proposed law in Singapore spelling out contempt of court and setting out tough penalties has drawn criticism from rights groups and raised questions among foreign diplomats over the implications for freedom of speech in the wealthy city-state.

Singapore has for years taken a tough stand to protect what it sees as appropriate morality and social harmony on the multi-ethnic island and international press groups have often decried constraints on free speech and the media.

The government says the bill, due to come up for a second reading in parliament on Monday, would not change or expand current contempt of court practices and only aims to clarify them.

The new bill is "a crystallization of the law", said K. Shanmugam, the minister of home affairs and law.

Under the law, offenders could be fined up to S$100,000 and jailed up to three years. Currently, no penalties are set down and contempt of court rulings are based on precedents.

Critics say the bill's vaguely worded provisions and the harsh punishments proposed could further impede freedom of speech as it would likely lead to self-censorship.

"It could have a chilling effect on free speech because the bill contains severe sanctions for being convicted – the moment there is a threat of a jail term and a substantial fine, I think most people would err on the side of caution", said lawyer Sui Yi Siong from Harry Elias Partnership LLP said.

Britain abolished a similar act called "Scandalising the Judiciary" in 2013 on the basis that "it was unnecessary and incompatible with freedom of speech", the British High Commision told Reuters.

The offence had not been successfully prosecuted in England and Wales since 1931.

"The UK will continue to urge Singapore and all countries which retain 'Scandalising the Judiciary' to abolish it," said a High Commission spokesman.

The group Human Rights Watch said the bill was "overly broad" and it should be revised to narrow its scope and reduce "disproportionate penalties".

A public petition calling for a delay in the passage of the bill and a clarification of provisions was submitted to parliament on Wednesday, the first such petition in nine years.

But it only drew 249 signatures.

© Reuters. K. Shanmugam, minister of foreign affairs of Singapore, addresses the 68th session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York

Reporters Without Borders ranks Singapore 154th out of 180 countries in its World Press Freedom Index behind the Democratic Republic of Congo and Venezuela.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.