Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

U.S., NATO signal willingness to slow Afghan drawdown

Published 10/08/2015, 01:25 PM
Updated 10/08/2015, 01:25 PM
© Reuters. U.S. Army General John Campbell, commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, prepares to testify before House Armed Services Committee hearing on "U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan" on Capitol Hill in Washington

By Phil Stewart, Sabine Siebold and Robin Emmott

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The United States and its NATO allies signaled a willingness on Thursday to consider slowing their withdrawal from Afghanistan, days after the Taliban's brief takeover of a provincial capital stoked concern about the strength of Afghan state forces.

U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter said he asked allies for flexibility as Washington reviews a withdrawal timetable currently supposed to slash the nearly 10,000 U.S. troops to a small U.S.-embassy based force after 2016.

"A number of countries today indicated a willingness to change their plans and posture," Carter said after a NATO defense ministers meeting in Brussels. NATO says there are more than 6,000 non-U.S. forces contributing to the "Resolute Support" mission.

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg told reporters flatly: "I sense that many allies are willing to stay longer if needed."

Although Afghan forces have recaptured the strategic northern city of Kunduz, its brief fall to the Taliban last month underscored concerns about the capabilities of Afghanistan's security forces.

U.S. President Barack Obama had aimed to withdraw all but a small U.S. force before leaving office, pinning his hopes on training and equipping local forces to contain Taliban militants fighting to return to power.

Washington has spent around $65 billion on preparing the fledgling Afghan security forces of about 350,000 personnel.

But that is still very far from complete. Carter said he was preparing a U.S. funding request to sustain Afghan troops at their target peak levels of around 350,000 in 2017 "and beyond".

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The political perils of the Afghan mission came into stark view after a U.S. military strike on Saturday in Kunduz hit an Afghan hospital run by Doctors Without Borders, or Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF).

Obama on Wednesday apologized to MSF for the bombing, which killed 22 people, and came as Afghan forces, with U.S. support, fought to retake the city.

Germany's defense minister said NATO troops may need to stay longer and pointed directly to the fighting in Kunduz.

"We'll need to look at how we go forward and whether we should stay longer," Ursula von der Leyen told reporters.

U.S. Army General John Campbell, commander of international forces in Afghanistan, has prepared options for Obama that could see the United States keep thousands of troops in Afghanistan after 2016, U.S. officials say. No decisions have been made.

In testimony to Congress this week, Campbell, without disclosing his recommendations, said rising threats in Afghanistan from Islamic State and al Qaeda were among factors informing his advice to the White House.

Von der Leyen said policy had to adapt to the changing situation on the ground. "This means that we put the responsibility into the Afghans' hands in a way that they are actually capable to keep their country stable," she said.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.