Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

United Technologies wins reversal of $657 million award over engine prices

Published 04/06/2015, 06:53 PM
Updated 04/06/2015, 07:01 PM
© Reuters.  United Technologies wins reversal of $657 million award over engine prices

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - United Technologies Corp (NYSE:UTX) on Monday won the reversal of a $657 million judgment imposed over decades-old claims accusing its Pratt & Whitney unit of overcharging the federal government on jet engines for the military.

The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati said the government did not prove damages from false statements allegedly made by Pratt when it competed in 1983 with GE Aircraft for a contract to supply engines for the F-15 and F-16 fighter jets.

Writing for a three-judge panel, Circuit Judge Jeffrey Sutton said the government had "every opportunity" to present expert testimony to show damages, but never took advantage.

"The government had the burden of proving damages, and it never did," Sutton wrote.

Monday's decision returned the case to U.S. District Judge Thomas Rose in Dayton, Ohio, who in June 2013 awarded damages for what the government said was six years of overcharges. The government now has another chance to provide damages.

The U.S. Department of Justice had no immediate comment.

United Technologies spokesman John Moran said the Hartford, Connecticut-based company is "very pleased" with the decision.

"UTC has long maintained that the government suffered no actual damages as a result of the statements made in 1983," he said. "We look forward to returning to the district court to finally put an end to this long-running case."

The government originally sued Pratt in 1999.

Nine years later, Rose fined Pratt $7 million for violations of the federal False Claims Act, but found no actual damages because Pratt had given the government price concessions.

The 6th Circuit upheld the fine but reversed the damages finding in 2010, leading to the subsequent award of damages and United Technologies' latest appeal.

In Monday's decision, Sutton suggested that the case has gone on long enough.

"We are tempted to say that, after seventeen years of litigation about a fraud that occurred thirty-two years ago, the time has come to end this dispute," he wrote.

According to court papers, the government sued in Dayton because some of Pratt's alleged improper activity occurred at the nearby Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

United Technologies shares closed up 73 cents at $117.86 in Monday trading.

The case is U.S. v. United Technologies Corp, 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 13-4057.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.