Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Court questions Google on patent values in Microsoft case

Published 04/08/2015, 07:01 PM
Updated 04/09/2015, 05:12 PM
© Reuters. Workers install the logo of U.S. technology giant Microsoft on the wall of Nokia's former headquarters in Espoo

© Reuters. Workers install the logo of U.S. technology giant Microsoft on the wall of Nokia's former headquarters in Espoo

By Dan Levine

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court appeared skeptical on Wednesday toward Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOGL)'s bid to charge Microsoft Corp a high royalty rate to use some of the Internet search provider's Motorola (NYSE:MSI) Mobility patents.

Microsoft sued Motorola in 2010, alleging Motorola breached its commitment to license some of its industry standard patents on fair terms. After a 2012 trial, a Seattle federal judge found that the appropriate rate for Motorola to license certain wireless and video technology used in the Xbox game console was only a fraction of what Motorola had asked for.

Google sold the Motorola handset business to Lenovo last year, but kept its patents.

The value of Google's patents can affect how it negotiates royalty rates with other tech companies, and firms including Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Intel Corp (NASDAQ:INTC) filed court papers supporting Microsoft.

After the 2012 trial before U.S. District Judge James Robart, the judge said the appropriate royalty rate was about $1.8 million, slightly above Microsoft's estimate, but well below Motorola's demand for as much as $4 billion a year.

Google asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday to rule that the patent rate should have been determined by a jury, not the judge. However, all three members of the 9th Circuit panel suggested that Google's attorneys had not sought a jury trial on that issue at the time.

"It seems pretty clear...that both parties anticipated a bench trial," Chief Judge Sidney Thomas said.

After Robart set the patent rate, a jury in 2013 awarded Microsoft about $14.5 million in damages for breach of contract in a subsequent trial. Google has asked that the 9th Circuit reverse that award as well.

The 9th Circuit is expected to rule sometime in the coming months.

© Reuters. Workers install the logo of U.S. technology giant Microsoft on the wall of Nokia's former headquarters in Espoo

The case in the 9th Circuit is Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) vs. Motorola Mobility Inc. et al, 14-35393.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.